Cited by 16Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Deep reinforcement learning for task-based feature learning in prosthetic vision

White, Jack, Kameneva, Tatiana, McCarthy, Chris·2019·2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Developing hand-crafted visual features to enhance perception with prosthetic vision devices can often miss important aspects of a given task. Retinal implants suffer from the need to create low-dimensional features for elaborate tasks such as navigation in complex environments. Using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), visual features are learnt through task-based simulations that remove the ambiguity of inferring the visual information most crucial to a specific activity. Learning task-based features ensures that the visual information is salient to the tasks an implant recipient may be undertaking and eliminates potentially redundant features. In this paper, we focus specifically on basic orientation and mobility, and the methods for feature learning and visualisation in structured 3D environments. We propose a new model for learning visual features through task-based simulations and show that learnt features can be transferred directly to real RGB-D images. We demonstrate this new scalable approach for feature learning in simulation and open the possibility for more complex simulations of more complex tasks in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2019.8856541

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the five end-to-end studies identified, two relied on auto-encoding strategies and three entailed reinforcement learning approaches.

    “Of the five end-to-end studies that we identified, two relied on auto-encoding strategies,88,91 where the task to be learnt is reconstructing an original image, and three entailed reinforcement learning approaches,87,89,90 for which the scope of learned tasks is wider.”
  • Computational optimization approaches can aid in the development of safe stimulation protocols because they allow faster exploration of the large parameter space and enable task-driven optimization of image processing strategies.

    “Computational optimization approaches can also aid in the development of safe stimulation protocols, because they allow a faster exploration of the large parameter space and enable task-driven optimization of image processing strategies (Granley et al., 2022a; Fauvel and Chalk, 2022; White et al., 2019; Küçükoğlu et al., 2022; de Ruyter van Steveninck et al., 2022a; Ghaffari et al., 2021).”
  • This kind of AI learning is often performed in virtual environments due to the lack of real data, but current methods have employed virtual platforms with low realism, limiting their real-world usability.

    “This kind of AI learning is often performed in virtual environments due to the lack of real data, but current methods have employed virtual platforms with low realism, limiting their real-world usability.87,89,90”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, J., Kameneva, T., & McCarthy, C.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Volume
2019
Pages
2809-2812
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979370604
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
prosthetic vision, retinal prosthesis, visual feature learning, deep reinforcement learning, orientation and mobility, RGB-D
MeSH terms
Learning, Orientation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Vision, Ocular, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review