Cited by 819Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words

Open access
Zrenner, Eberhart, Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich, Benav, Heval, Besch, Dorothea, Bruckmann, Anna, Gabel, Veit-Peter, Gekeler, Florian, Greppmaier, Udo +11 more·2011·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

A light-sensitive, externally powered microchip was surgically implanted subretinally near the macular region of volunteers blind from hereditary retinal dystrophy. The implant contains an array of 1500 active microphotodiodes ('chip'), each with its own amplifier and local stimulation electrode. At the implant's tip, another array of 16 wire-connected electrodes allows light-independent direct stimulation and testing of the neuron-electrode interface. Visual scenes are projected naturally through the eye's lens onto the chip under the transparent retina. The chip generates a corresponding pattern of 38 × 40 pixels, each releasing light-intensity-dependent electric stimulation pulses. Subsequently, three previously blind persons could locate bright objects on a dark table, two of whom could discern grating patterns. One of these patients was able to correctly describe and name objects like a fork or knife on a table, geometric patterns, different kinds of fruit and discern shades of grey with only 15 per cent contrast. Without a training period, the regained visual functions enabled him to localize and approach persons in a room freely and to read large letters as complete words after several years of blindness. These results demonstrate for the first time that subretinal micro-electrode arrays with 1500 photodiodes can create detailed meaningful visual perception in previously blind individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.1747

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Striem-Amit et al. (2012a) found participants performed better than in experiments with tactile SSDs and retinal prostheses.

    “Participants performed better than in experiments with tactile SSDs (Chebat et al., 2007, Sampaio et al., 2001), retinal prostheses (Zrenner et al., 2010) and 55% showed acuity higher than the threshold for blindness (see also Levy-Tzedek, Riemer, & Amedi, 2014).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Zrenner et al., 2010

  • Only one subretinal prosthesis, the Alpha IMS implant and its successor Alpha AMS, have received marketing approval (CE mark).

    “Today, only one subretinal prosthesis, the Alpha IMS implant (figure 5(b)) and its successor Alpha AMS (Retina Implant AG), have received marketing approval (CE mark) [52,53].”
  • Most clinical neural interfaces function in a monopolar configuration with a common and distant return ground placed several millimetres away.

    “Most clinical neural interfaces function in a monopolar configuration with a common and distant return ground placed several millimetres away [9-12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zrenner, E., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Benav, H., Besch, D., Bruckmann, A., Gabel, V.-P., Gekeler, F., Greppmaier, U., Harscher, A., Kibbel, S., Koch, J., Kusnyerik, A., Peters, T., Stingl, K., Sachs, H., Stett, A., Szurman, P., Wilhelm, B., & Wilke, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 12, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Retina Implant AG, Gerhard-Kindler-Str. 8, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany
  • Steinbeis Transfer Centre Eyetrial at the Centre for Ophthalmology, Schleichstr. 12-16, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt (DE)
  • Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (DE)
Corresponding author
Zrenner, Eberhart
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
278
Issue
1711
Pages
1489-1497
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2158326388
Cited by
819
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 68
FWCI
25.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
subretinal implant, retinal prosthesis, inherited retinal disease, blindness, vision restoration, direct electrical stimulation, object recognition, letter reading, macula, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Humans, Light, Male, Reading, Retina, Sensory Aids, Visual Perception, Implants, Experimental, Retinal Dystrophies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review