Cited by 468Social Robot Interaction and HRIHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Robinette, Paul, Li, Wenchen, Allen, Robert, Howard, Ayanna M., Wagner, Alan R.·2016·2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

DOI 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Robots have the potential to save lives in emergency scenarios, but could have an equally disastrous effect if participants overtrust them. To explore this concept, we performed an experiment where a participant interacts with a robot in a non-emergency task to experience its behavior and then chooses whether to follow the robot's instructions in an emergency or not. Artificial smoke and fire alarms were used to add a sense of urgency. To our surprise, all 26 participants followed the robot in the emergency, despite half observing the same robot perform poorly in a navigation guidance task just minutes before. We performed additional exploratory studies investigating different failure modes. Even when the robot pointed to a dark room with no discernible exit the majority of people did not choose to safely exit the way they entered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051 · cited 1×
“Hancock et al. performed a meta-analysis over the existing human-robot trust literature identifying 11 relevant research articles and found that, for these papers, robot performance is most strongly associated with trust [7].”
Background
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696497 · Cited by 494
The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. M. (2010) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7 · Cited by 478
Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems
Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975844 · Cited by 311
Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust
Desai, M., Kaniarasu, P., Medvedev, M., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2013) · 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483596 · Cited by 234
Effect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2648849 · Cited by 205
Self-citation
Report of the technical investigation of The Station nightclub fire
Grosshandler, W. L., Bryner, N. P., Madrzykowski, D. M., & Kuntz, K. (2005) · doi:10.6028/nist.ncstar.2v1 · Cited by 148
Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Human behaviour in fire: the development and maturity of a scholarly study area
Bryan, J. L. (1999) · Fire and Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(199911/12)23:6 · Cited by 60

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

safarik, 2014, An all-time record 97 buildings of 200 meters or higher completed in 2014, CTBUH Year in Review
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 467

How context shapes the appropriateness of a robot’s voice
Torre, I., Latupeirissa, A., & McGinn, C. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223449 · Cited by 28
The role of reciprocity in human-robot social influence
Zonca, J., Folsø, A., & Sciutti, A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103424 · Cited by 36
Who's Laughing NAO? Examining Perceptions of Failure in a Humorous Robot Partner
Green, H. N., Islam, M. M., Ali, S., & Iqbal, T. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889353 · Cited by 36
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence
Taddeo, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001 · Cited by 30
The Right to a Fair Trial in Automated Civil Proceedings
Dymitruk, M. (2019) · Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology · doi:10.5817/mujlt2019-1-2 · Cited by 29
Ethical Considerations from Child-Robot Interactions in Under-Resourced Communities
Kumar, M., Kumar, M., Fosch‐Villaronga, E., Singh, D., & Shukla, J. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00882-1 · Cited by 38
A Wizard-of-Oz study of curiosity in human-robot interaction
Law, E., Cai, V., Liu, Q.-F., Sasy, S., Goh, J., Blidaru, A., & Kulić, D. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication · doi:10.1109/roman.2017.8172365 · Cited by 27
When Should a Robot Apologize? Understanding How Timing Affects Human-Robot Trust Repair
Nayyar, M., & Wagner, A. R. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_26 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Let Tesla Park Your Tesla: Driver Trust in a Semi-Automated Car
Tomzcak, K., Pelter, A., Gutierrez, C., Stretch, T., Hilf, D., Donadio, B. T., Tenhundfeld, N. L., de Visser, E. J., & Tossell, C. C. (2019) · Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium · doi:10.1109/sieds.2019.8735647 · Cited by 30
Robotic Assistance in Coordination of Patient Care
Gombolay, M., Yang, X. J., Hayes, B., Seo, N., Liu, Z., Wadhwania, S., Yu, T., Shah, N. T., Golen, T. H., & Shah, J. (2016) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2016.xii.026 · Cited by 28
TIP: A Trust Inference and Propagation Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teams
Guo, Y., Yang, X. J., & Shi, C. (2023) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-024-10175-3 · Cited by 37
Secure Robotics: Navigating Challenges at the Nexus of Safety, Trust, and Cybersecurity in Cyber-Physical Systems
Haskard, A., & Herath, D. C. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3723050 · Cited by 37
Explainable Robotic Systems
de Graaf, M. M. A., Malle, B. F., Dragan, A. D., & Tom Ziemke, B. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3173386.3173568 · Cited by 27
First impressions of a financial AI assistant: differences between high trust and low trust users
Schreibelmayr, S., Moradbakhti, L., & Mara, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1241290 · Cited by 33
Do Humans Trust Robots that Violate Moral Trust?
Khavas, Z. R., Kotturu, M. R., Ahmadzadeh, S. R., & Robinette, P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3651992 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
From Trust to Trust Dynamics: Combining Empirical and Computational Approaches to Model and Predict Trust Dynamics In Human-Autonomy Interaction
Yang, X. J., Guo, Y., & Schemanske, C. (2022) · Automation, collaboration, and e-services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10784-9_15 · Cited by 26
"What If It Is Wrong": Effects of Power Dynamics and Trust Repair Strategy on Trust and Compliance in HRI
Karli, U. B., Cao, S., & Huang, C. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576964 · Cited by 26
Would You Trust a Robot Therapist? Validating the Equivalency of Trust in Human-Robot Healthcare Scenarios
Xu, J. C., Bryant, D. G., & Howard, A. M. (2018) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525782 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
The Confucian Matador: Three Defenses Against the Mechanical Bull
Williams, T., Zhu, Q., Wen, R.-C., & de Visser, E. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3371382.3380740 · Cited by 28
Exploring the roles of trust and social group preference on the legitimacy of algorithmic decision-making vs. human decision-making for allocating COVID-19 vaccinations
Lünich, M., & Kieslich, K. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01412-3 · Cited by 26
Assessment of Trust in Automation in the “Real World”: Requirements for New Trust in Automation Measurement Techniques for Use by Practitioners
Tenhundfeld, N. L., Demir, M., & de Visser, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434221096261 · Cited by 26
The Pepper Humanoid Robot in Front Desk Application
Gardecki, A., Podpora, M., Beniak, R., & Klin, B. (2018) · Progress in Applied Electrical Engineering (PAEE) · doi:10.1109/paee.2018.8441069 · Cited by 24
Power in Human-Robot Interaction
Hou, Y. T.-Y., Cheon, E., & Jung, M. F. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634949 · Cited by 27
Algorithmic Ways of Seeing: Using Object Detection to Facilitate Art Exploration
Meyer, L. S., Aaen, J. E., Tranberg, A. R., Kun, P., Freiberger, M., Risi, S., & Løvlie, A. S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642157 · Cited by 25
Applied Affective Computing
Tian, L., Oviatt, S. L., Muszyński, M., Chamberlain, B. C., Healey, J., & Sano, A. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3502398 · Cited by 25
Trust and Cooperation
Kuipers, B. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.676767 · Cited by 24
Evaluating the Impact of Emotional Apology on Human-Robot Trust
Xu, J. C., & Howard, A. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900518 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Exploring Theory of Mind for Human-Robot Collaboration
Romeo, M., McKenna, P. E., Robb, D. A., Rajendran, G., Nesset, B., Cangelosi, A., & Hastie, H. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900550 · Cited by 25
Enabling Team of Teams: A Trust Inference and Propagation (TIP) Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teams
Guo, Y., Yang, X., & Shi, C. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.003 · Cited by 23
He said, she said, it said: Effects of robot group membership and human authority on people's willingness to follow their instructions
Sembroski, C. E., Fraune, M. R., & Šabanović, S. (2017) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2017.8172280 · Cited by 23
A Review on Trust in Human-Robot InteractionPreprint
Khavas, Z. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.10045 · Cited by 53
Theory and Design Considerations for the User Experience of Smart Environments
Reig, S., Fong, T. W., Forlizzi, J., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3142112 · Cited by 22
Interaction Needs and Opportunities for Failing Robots
Morales, C. G., Carter, E. J., Tan, X. Z., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2019) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3322276.3322345 · Cited by 22
Effects of Speed, Cyclicity, and Dimensionality on Distancing, Time, and Preference in Human-Aerial Vehicle Interactions
Duncan, B. A., & Murphy, R. R. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2983927 · Cited by 21
Exploring Factors Affecting User Trust Across Different Human-Robot Interaction Settings and Cultures
Alzahrani, A., Robinson, S., & Ahmad, M. (2022) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3527188.3561920 · Cited by 21
Human Perceptions of the Severity of Domestic Robot Errors
Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Walters, M. L. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_64 · Cited by 21
Factors that influence robot acceptance
Xu, L., & Yu, F. (2019) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2019-0136 · Cited by 21
Flailing, Hailing, Prevailing
Reig, S., Carter, E. J., Fong, T., Forlizzi, J., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434073.3444659 · Cited by 21
An explanation is not an excuse: Trust calibration in an age of transparent robots
Wagner, A. R., & Robinette, P. (2021) · Trust in Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00009-5 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
The Scale of Artificial Intelligence Literacy for all (SAIL4ALL): A Tool for Assessing Knowledge on Artificial Intelligence in All Adult Populations and Settings
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Lutz, C. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/bvyku · Cited by 20
Appropriately Representing Military Tasks for Human-Machine Teaming Research
Tossell, C. C., Kim, B., Donadio, B. T., de Visser, E. J., Holec, R., & Phillips, E. K. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59990-4_19 · Cited by 20
From Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Intelligence Augmentation (IA): Design Principles, Potential Risks, and Emerging Issues
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Zhou, L., Rudin, C., Duke University, Gombolay, M., Georgia Institute of Technology, Spohrer, J., International Society of Service Innovation Professionals, Zhou, M., Juji, et al. (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00085 · Cited by 20
Applying the swift trust model to human-robot teaming
Haring, K. S., Phillips, E. K., Lazzara, E. H., Ullman, D. L., Baker, A. L., & Keebler, J. R. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00017-4 · Cited by 20
RoSI: A Model for Predicting Robot Social Influence
Erel, H., Vázquez, M., Sebo, S. S., Salomons, N., Gillet, S., & Scassellati, B. M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641515 · Cited by 21
Adaptive Trust Calibration for Supervised Autonomous Vehicles
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2018) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3239092.3265948 · Cited by 23
The Dark Side of Human-Robot Interaction: Ethical Considerations and Community Guidelines for the Field of HRI
Haring, K. S., Novitzky, M. M., Robinette, P., de Visser, E. J., Wagner, A. R., & Williams, T. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673184 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Feeling committed to a robot: why, what, when and how?
Powell, H., & Michael, J. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0039 · Cited by 18
Intelligent robot-assisted evacuation: A review
Bahamid, A., Ibrahim, A. M., Ibrahim, A. N., Zahurin, I. Z., & Wahid, A. N. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012159 · Cited by 18
Explaining in Time
Arnold, T., Kasenberg, D., & Scheutz, M. (2021) · ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact. · doi:10.1145/3457183 · Cited by 12
Effective Robot Evacuation Strategies in Emergencies
Nayyar, M., & Wagner, A. R. (2019) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956307 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Social Influence of Group Norms Developed by Human-Robot Groups
Fuse, Y., & Tokumaru, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2982181 · Cited by 18
A Systematic Review of the Socio-Legal Dimensions of Responsible AI and Its Role in Improving Health and Safety in Construction
Agapiou, A. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14051469 · Cited by 17
Social Influence under uncertainty in interaction with peers, robots and computers
Zonca, J., Folsø, A., & Sciutti, A. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00959-x · Cited by 18
Lying About Lying
Rogers, K., Webber, R. J. A., & Howard, A. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3580178 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
An Adversarial Attack System for Face Recognition
Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Liao, X., Wang, X., & Gu, Z. (2021) · Journal on artificial intelligence · doi:10.32604/jai.2021.014175 · Cited by 17
Expectations Vs. Reality: Unreliability and Transparency in a Treasure Hunt Game With Icub
Aroyo, A. M., Pasquali, D., Kothig, A., Rea, F., Sandini, G., & Sciutti, A. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3083465 · Cited by 17
Modeling Trust and Empathy for Socially Interactive Robots
Gebhard, P., Aylett, R. S., Higashinaka, R., Jokinen, K., Tanaka, H., & Yoshino, K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-3476-5_2 · Cited by 17
Dynamic Sign Guidance Optimization for Crowd Evacuation considering Flow Equilibrium
Li, M., Xu, C., Xu, Y., Ma, L., & Wei, Y. P. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1155/2022/2555350 · Cited by 17
The effects of cognitive biases and imperfectness in long-term robot-human interactions: Case studies using five cognitive biases on three robots
Biswas, M., & Murray, J. (2017) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.07.007 · Cited by 14
Trust Lengthens Decision Time on Unexpected Recommendations in Human-agent Interaction
Tokushige, H., Narumi, T., Ono, S., Fuwamoto, Y., Tanikawa, T., & Hirose, M. (2017) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3125739.3125751 · Cited by 17
Dynamic Selection of Reliance Calibration Cues With AI Reliance Model
Fukuchi, Y., & Yamada, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3339548 · Cited by 16
When to Explain? Exploring the Effects of Explanation Timing on User Perceptions and Trust in AI systems
Chen, C., Liao, M., & Sundar, S. S. (2024) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3686038.3686066 · Cited by 20
Influence of Robots’ Voice Naturalness on Trust and Compliance
Becker, D., Braach, L., Clasmeier, L., Kaufmann, T., Ong, O., Ahrens, K., Gäde, C., Strahl, E., Fu, D., & Wermter, S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3706066 · Cited by 20
Exposing Error in Poverty Management Technology: A Method for Auditing Government Benefits Screening Tools
Escher, N., & Banović, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392874 · Cited by 16
Implications of AI Bias in HRI
Hitron, T., Yaar, N. M., & Erel, H. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576977 · Cited by 16
The Transfer of Human Trust in Robot Capabilities across Tasks
Soh, H., Pan, S. L., Chen, M., & Hsu, D. (2018) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2018.xiv.033 · Cited by 17
Deconstructed Trustee Theory
Williams, T., Ayers, D., Kaufman, C., Serrano, J., & Roy, S. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434073.3444644 · Cited by 20
Invited Talk: The Coming AI Hackers
Schneier, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78086-9_26 · Cited by 16
Taking Off with AI: Lessons from Aviation for Healthcare
Bondi, E., Hartvigsen, T., Sanneman, L., Sankaranarayanan, S., Harned, Z., Wickerson, G., Gichoya, J. W., Oakden‐Rayner, L., Celi, L. A., Lungren, M. P., et al. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623224 · Cited by 17
Exploring the role of judgement and shared situation awareness when working with AI recommender systems
Srivastava, D., Lilly, J. M., & Feigh, K. M. (2024) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-024-00771-9 · Cited by 17
Exploring the Effect of Explanations During Robot-Guided Emergency Evacuation
Nayyar, M., Zoloty, Z., McFarland, C., & Wagner, A. R. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_2 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
A Broad View on Robot Self-Defense: Rapid Scoping Review and Cultural Comparison
Cooney, M., Shiomi, M., Duarte, E. K., & Vinel, A. V. (2023) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics12020043 · Cited by 15
Examining the Presence of Gender Bias in Customer Reviews Using Word EmbeddingPreprint
Mishra, A., Mishra, H., & Rathee, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3327404 · Cited by 16
AI Accidents: An Emerging Threat
Arnold, Z., & Toner, H. (2021) · doi:10.51593/20200072 · Cited by 15
"It's Not the AI's Fault Because It Relies Purely on Data": How Causal Attributions of AI Decisions Shape Trust in AI Systems
Pareek, S., Schömbs, S., Velloso, E., & Gonçalves, J. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713468 · Cited by 20
The Social Triad Model: Considering the Deployer in a Novel Approach to Trust in Human–Robot Interaction
Cameron, D. S., Collins, E. C., de Saille, S., Eimontaite, I., Greenwood, A., & Law, J. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01048-3 · Cited by 15
Emergence and collapse of reciprocity in semiautomatic driving coordination experiments with humans
Shirado, H., Kasahara, S., & Christakis, N. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2307804120 · Cited by 16
School-age children are more skeptical of inaccurate robots than adults
Flanagan, T., Georgiou, N. C., Scassellati, B. M., & Kushnir, T. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105814 · Cited by 16
The perfect technological storm: artificial intelligence and moral complacency
Kaas, M. H. L. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09788-0 · Cited by 19
Would You Obey an Aggressive Robot: A Human-Robot Interaction Field Study
Agrawal, S., & Williams, M. (2018) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525615 · Cited by 14
Examining Profiles for Robotic Risk Assessment: Does a Robot's Approach to Risk Affect User Trust?
Bridgwater, T., Giuliani, M., van Maris, A., Baker, G., Winfield, A., & Pipe, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3319502.3374804 · Cited by 14
Grounding behaviours with conversational interfaces: effects of embodiment and failures
Kontogiorgos, D., Pereira, A., & Gustafson, J. (2021) · Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces · doi:10.1007/s12193-021-00366-y · Cited by 14
Vision for Robust Robot Manipulation
Martínez-Martín, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19071648 · Cited by 14
Getting to Know One Another: Calibrating Intent, Capabilities and Trust for Human-Robot Collaboration
Lee, J. A., Fong, J., Kok, B. C., & Soh, H. (2020) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9340736 · Cited by 14
Honest machines? A cross-disciplinary perspective on trustworthy technology for children
Hoehl, S., Krenn, B., & Vincze, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2024.1308881 · Cited by 13
"The robot may not notice my discomfort" – Examining the Experience of Vulnerability for Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hannibal, G., Weiss, A., & Charisi, V. (2021) · 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515513 · Cited by 11
EnviRobots: How Human–Robot Interaction Can Facilitate Sustainable Behavior
Scheutz, C., Law, T., & Scheutz, M. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132112283 · Cited by 13
Trust in systems: identification of 17 unresolved research questions and the highlighting of inconsistencies
Atchley, A., Barr, H. M., O’Hear, E. H., Weger, K., Mesmer, B. L., Gholston, S. E., & Tenhundfeld, N. L. (2023) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2023.2223251 · Cited by 14
Reducing Overtrust in Failing Robotic Systems
Christensen, A. B. H., Dam, C. R., Corentin, R., Bauer, J. E., Mohamed, R. A., & Jensen, L. C. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673235 · Cited by 13
The Seductive Allure of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Neurotechnology
Giattino, C., Kwong, L., Rafetto, C., & Farahany, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314269 · Cited by 13
A roadmap for developing team trust metrics for human-autonomy teams
Schaefer, K. E., Perelman, B. S., Gremillion, G. M., Marathe, A., & Metcalfe, J. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00012-5 · Cited by 13
Secure Autonomous Cloud Brained Humanoid Robot Assisting Rescuers in Hazardous Environments
Angelopoulos, G., Baras, N., & Dasygenis, M. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10020124 · Cited by 13
A framework for trust-related knowledge transfer in human–robot interaction
Diab, M., & Demiris, Y. (2024) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w · Cited by 12
Comparing Strategies for Robot Communication of Role-Grounded Moral Norms
Wen, R., Kim, B., Phillips, E. K., Zhu, Q., & Williams, T. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434074.3447185 · Cited by 12
Autonomous Driving and Perverse Incentives
Loh, W., & Misselhorn, C. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0322-6 · Cited by 12
Exploring Trust in Human-Agent Collaboration
Schwaninger, I., Fitzpatrick, G., & Weiss, A. (2019) · Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) · doi:10.18420/ecscw2019_ep08 · Cited by 12
How Do We Perceive Our Trainee Robots? Exploring the Impact of Robot Errors and Appearance When Performing Domestic Physical Tasks on Teachers’ Trust and Evaluations
Aliasghari, P., Ghafurian, M., Nehaniv, C., & Dautenhahn, K. (2023) · ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact. · doi:10.1145/3582516 · Cited by 9
Regulating AI-Based Remote Biometric Identification. Investigating the Public Demand for Bans, Audits, and Public Database Registrations
Kieslich, K., & Lünich, M. (2024) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658548 · Cited by 14
ContractMind: Trust-calibration interaction design for AI contract review tools
Zeng, J., Chen, K., Wang, R., Li, Y., Fan, M., Wu, K., Qi, X., & Wang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103411 · Cited by 17
Trust dampening and trust promoting: A dual-pathway of trust calibration in human-robot interaction
HUANG, X., & Li, Y. (2024) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2024.00527 · Cited by 10

Authors: Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R.
Affiliations: Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID: Robinette, Paul
Howard, Ayanna M.
Wagner, Alan R.
Venue: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
Publisher: IEEE
Published: 2016-03
Pages: 101-108
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740
OpenAlex: W4254148040
Cited by: 468
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4
FWCI: 48.41
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Funders: Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords: trust in robots, emergency evacuation, human-robot interaction, guidance and navigation, emergency response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks