Cited by 468Social Robot Interaction and HRIHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Robinette, Paul, Li, Wenchen, Allen, Robert, Howard, Ayanna M., Wagner, Alan R.·2016·2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

DOI 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Robots have the potential to save lives in emergency scenarios, but could have an equally disastrous effect if participants overtrust them. To explore this concept, we performed an experiment where a participant interacts with a robot in a non-emergency task to experience its behavior and then chooses whether to follow the robot's instructions in an emergency or not. Artificial smoke and fire alarms were used to add a sense of urgency. To our surprise, all 26 participants followed the robot in the emergency, despite half observing the same robot perform poorly in a navigation guidance task just minutes before. We performed additional exploratory studies investigating different failure modes. Even when the robot pointed to a dark room with no discernible exit the majority of people did not choose to safely exit the way they entered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051 · cited 1×
“Hancock et al. performed a meta-analysis over the existing human-robot trust literature identifying 11 relevant research articles and found that, for these papers, robot performance is most strongly associated with trust [7].”
Background
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696497 · Cited by 494
The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. M. (2010) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7 · Cited by 478
Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems
Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975844 · Cited by 311
Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust
Desai, M., Kaniarasu, P., Medvedev, M., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2013) · 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483596 · Cited by 234
Effect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2648849 · Cited by 205
Self-citation
Report of the technical investigation of The Station nightclub fire
Grosshandler, W. L., Bryner, N. P., Madrzykowski, D. M., & Kuntz, K. (2005) · doi:10.6028/nist.ncstar.2v1 · Cited by 148
Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Human behaviour in fire: the development and maturity of a scholarly study area
Bryan, J. L. (1999) · Fire and Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(199911/12)23:6 · Cited by 60

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

safarik, 2014, An all-time record 97 buildings of 200 meters or higher completed in 2014, CTBUH Year in Review
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921
Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face Recognition
Sharif, M., Bhagavatula, S., Bauer, L., & Reiter, M. K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978392 · Cited by 1,530
Expectation vs. Experience: Evaluating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models
Vaithilingam, P., Zhang, T., & Glassman, E. L. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519665 · Cited by 660
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573
Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams
de Visser, E. J., Peeters, M. M. M., Jung, M. F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T. H., Pak, R., & Neerincx, M. A. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x · Cited by 447
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development
Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861 · Cited by 338
“…et al., 2015; Law et al., 2017), future contact intensions with the robot (Short et al., 2010; Salem et al., 2013, 2015; Brooks et al., 2016; Robinette et al., 2016; Kwon et al., 2018), the robot being a good teammate (Kwon et al., 2018), psychological closeness with the robot (Salem et…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
The Role of Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Lewis, M., Sycara, K. P., & Walker, P. M. (2018) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_8 · Cited by 307
Will You Accept an Imperfect AI?: Exploring Designs for Adjusting End-user Expectations of AI Systems
Kocielnik, R., Amershi, S., & Bennett, P. N. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300641 · Cited by 277
Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229132 · Cited by 239
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Vereschak, O., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476068 · Cited by 229
An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI
Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner, A. R., & Welsh, S. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportunities
Kok, B. C., & Soh, H. (2020) · Current Robotics Reports · doi:10.1007/s43154-020-00029-y · Cited by 245
Artificial intelligence ethics by design. Evaluating public perception on the importance of ethical design principles of artificial intelligence
Kieslich, K., Keller, B., & Starke, C. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221092956 · Cited by 258
Evaluating Effects of User Experience and System Transparency on Trust in Automation
Yang, X. J., Unhelkar, V. V., Li, K., & Shah, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020230 · Cited by 208
Bad machines corrupt good morals
Köbis, N., Bonnefon, J., & Rahwan, I. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01128-2 · Cited by 225
Effect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2648849 · Cited by 205
Self-citation
The use of social robots in classrooms: A review of field-based studies
Woo, H., LeTendre, G. K., Pham-Shouse, T., & Xiong, Y. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100388 · Cited by 224
Trust in socially assistive robots: Considerations for use in rehabilitation
Langer, A., Feingold-Polak, R., Mueller, O., Kellmeyer, P., & Levy‐Tzedek, S. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.014 · Cited by 190
Trusting Virtual Agents: The Effect of Personality
Zhou, M. X., Mark, G., Li, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3232077 · Cited by 176
Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes: How the use of AI-based advisory systems shapes choice behavior in R&D investment decisions
Keding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970 · Cited by 168
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149
“Similarly, Robinette et al. [2016] examines (over)trust of autonomous systems and find in emergency situations, people will follow robots into further danger, because they attribute the agency of the robot to the (assumed capable and responsible) designers.”
Background
Modeling and predicting trust dynamics in human–robot teaming: A Bayesian inference approach
Guo, Y., & Yang, X. J. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00703-3 · Cited by 133
Individual differences in human–machine trust: A multi-study look at the perfect automation schema
Lyons, J. B., & Guznov, S. Y. (2018) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2018.1491071 · Cited by 128
Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships
Prescott, T. J., & Robillard, J. M. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101993 · Cited by 119
Guided crowd evacuation: approaches and challenges
Zhou, M., Dong, H., Ioannou, P., Zhao, Y., & Wang, F. (2019) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2019.1911672 · Cited by 110
Human–robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker
You, S., & Robert Jr., L. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171281 · Cited by 118
Humanization of robots: Is it really such a good idea?
Giger, J., Piçarra, N. J. G., Alves‐Oliveira, P., Oliveira, R., & Arriaga, P. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.147 · Cited by 116
Modeling Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey
Khavas, Z. R., Ahmadzadeh, R., & Robinette, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_44 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Taxonomy of Trust-Relevant Failures and Mitigation Strategies
Tolmeijer, S., Weiss, A., Hanheide, M., Lindner, F., Powers, T. M., Dixon, C., & Tielman, M. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3319502.3374793 · Cited by 103
Impact of Anthropomorphic Robot Design on Trust and Attention in Industrial Human-Robot Interaction
Onnasch, L., & Hildebrandt, C. L. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3472224 · Cited by 114
A Review on Human–Machine Trust Evaluation: Human-Centric and Machine-Centric Perspectives
Gebru, B., Zeleke, L., Blankson, D., Nabil, M., Nateghi, S., Homaifar, A., & Tunstel, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3144956 · Cited by 101
Explainable Robotics in Human-Robot Interactions
Setchi, R., Dehkordi, M. B., & Khan, J. S. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.198 · Cited by 99
Ethics in human–AI teaming: principles and perspectives
Pflanzer, M., Traylor, Z., Lyons, J. B., Dubljević, V., & Nam, C. S. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00214-z · Cited by 106
Redefining Safety in Light of Human-Robot Interaction: A Critical Review of Current Standards and Regulations
Martinetti, A., Chemweno, P. K., Nizamis, K., & Fosch‐Villaronga, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fceng.2021.666237 · Cited by 96
Trust in humans and robots: Economically similar but emotionally different
Schniter, E., Shields, T. W., & Sznycer, D. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2020.102253 · Cited by 89
Trust and social engineering in human robot interaction: Will a robot make you disclose sensitive information, conform to its recommendations or gamble?
Aroyo, A. M., Rea, F., Sandini, G., & Sciutti, A. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2856272 · Cited by 85
Interacting with medical artificial intelligence: Integrating self-responsibility attribution, human–computer trust, and personality
Huo, W., Zheng, G., Yan, J., Sun, L., & Han, L. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107253 · Cited by 92
Piggybacking Robots
Booth, S., Tompkin, J., Pfister, H., Waldo, J., Gajos, K. Z., & Nagpal, R. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020211 · Cited by 84
Multi-task trust transfer for human–robot interaction
Soh, H., Xie, Y., Chen, M., & Hsu, D. (2019) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919866905 · Cited by 88
Overtrusting robots: Setting a research agenda to mitigate overtrust in automation
Aroyo, A. M., de Bruyne, J., Dheu, O., Fosch‐Villaronga, E., Gudkov, A., Hoch, H., Jones, S., Lutz, C., Sætra, H. S., Solberg, M., et al. (2021) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0029 · Cited by 86
Trust and Distrust of Automated Parking in a Tesla Model X
Tenhundfeld, N. L., de Visser, E. J., Ries, A. J., Finomore, V. S., & Tossell, C. C. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819865412 · Cited by 83
Robotic assistance in the coordination of patient care
Gombolay, M., Yang, X. J., Hayes, B., Seo, N., Liu, Z., Wadhwania, S., Yu, T., Shah, N. T., Golen, T. H., & Shah, J. (2018) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364918778344 · Cited by 75
Futuristic Autobiographies
Cheon, E., & Su, N. M. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171244 · Cited by 77
Can You Trust Your Trust Measure?
Chita-Tegmark, M., Law, T., Rabb, N., & Scheutz, M. J. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434073.3444677 · Cited by 73
Measuring trust in artificial intelligence: validation of an established scale and its short form
McGrath, M. J., Lack, O., Tisch, J., & Duenser, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1582880 · Cited by 108
How the Timing and Magnitude of Robot Errors Influence Peoples’ Trust of Robots in an Emergency Scenario
Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Walters, M. L. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_5 · Cited by 71
The Development of Overtrust: An Empirical Simulation and Psychological Analysis in the Context of Human–Robot Interaction
Ullrich, D., Butz, A. M., & Diefenbach, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.554578 · Cited by 72
Explainable recommendation: when design meets trust calibration
Naiseh, M., Al-Thani, D., Jiang, N., & Ali, R. (2021) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-021-00916-0 · Cited by 68
“Such faulty design has shown critical safety issues [68].”
Background
Security Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities
Neupane, S., Mitra, S., Fernandez, I. A., Saha, S., Mittal, S., Chen, J., Pillai, N., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3363657 · Cited by 96
Are we behaviorally immune to COVID-19 through robots?
Xiong, X., Wong, I. A., & Yang, F. X. (2021) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2021.103312 · Cited by 67
The Illusion of Control: Placebo Effects of Control Settings
Vaccaro, K., Huang, D., Eslami, M., Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., & Karahalios, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173590 · Cited by 65
Persuasive robots should avoid authority: The effects of formal and real authority on persuasion in human-robot interaction
Saunderson, S., & Nejat, G. (2021) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abd5186 · Cited by 65
An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare
Cawthorne, D., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00233-1 · Cited by 60
Social robot deception and the culture of trust
Sætra, H. S. (2021) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0021 · Cited by 65
Embodiment Effects in Interactions with Failing Robots
Kontogiorgos, D., van Waveren, S., Wallberg, O., Pereira, A., Leite, I., & Gustafson, J. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376372 · Cited by 58
When AI is Perceived to Be Fairer than a Human: Understanding Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in a Job Application Context
Choung, H., Seberger, J. S., & David, P. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2266244 · Cited by 72
Comparing Robot and Human guided Personalization: Adaptive Exercise Robots are Perceived as more Competent and Trustworthy
Schneider, S., & Kümmert, F. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00629-w · Cited by 56
The societal impact of the metaverse
Henz, P. (2022) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-022-00032-6 · Cited by 56
Collection of Metaphors for Human-Robot Interaction
Alves‐Oliveira, P., Lupetti, M. L., Luria, M., Löffler, D., Gamboa, M., Albaugh, L., Kamino, W., Ostrowski, A. K., Puljiz, D., Reynolds-Cuéllar, P., et al. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462060 · Cited by 54
How can we trust a robot?
Kuipers, B. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3173087 · Cited by 54
Technology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust
Danaher, J., & Sætra, H. S. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09661-y · Cited by 76
Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction Research
Seaborn, K., Barbareschi, G., & Chandra, S. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-00968-4 · Cited by 64
Modeling the Human-Robot Trust Phenomenon: A Conceptual Framework based on Risk
Wagner, A. R., Robinette, P., & Howard, A. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3152890 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Artificial agents’ explainability to support trust: considerations on timing and context
Papagni, G., de Pagter, J., Zafari, S., Filzmoser, M., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01462-7 · Cited by 52
Regulating for trust: Can law establish trust in artificial intelligence?
Tamò‐Larrieux, A., Guitton, C., Mayer, S., & Lutz, C. (2023) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12568 · Cited by 59
Communicating the Limitations of AI: The Effect of Message Framing and Ownership on Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Kim, T., & Song, H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2049134 · Cited by 56
Self-Driving Cars: Ethical Responsibilities of Design Engineers
Borenstein, J., Herkert, J. R., & Miller, K. (2017) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2017.2696600 · Cited by 47
Trust Measurement in Human-Autonomy Teams: Development of a Conceptual Toolkit
Krausman, A., Neubauer, C. E., Forster, D. E., Lakhmani, S. G., Baker, A. L., Fitzhugh, S. M., Gremillion, G. M., Wright, J. L., Metcalfe, J. S., & Schaefer, K. E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3530874 · Cited by 49
The Impact of First Impressions on Human- Robot Trust During Problem-Solving Scenarios
Xu, J. C., & Howard, A. M. (2018) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525669 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Social Robotics and the Good Life
(2022) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.1515/9783839462652 · Cited by 46
Behavioural Responses to Robot Conversational Failures
Kontogiorgos, D., Pereira, A., Sahindal, B., van Waveren, S., & Gustafson, J. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3319502.3374782 · Cited by 52
Helping Robots Learn: A Human-Robot Master-Apprentice Model Using Demonstrations via Virtual Reality Teleoperation
DelPreto, J., Lipton, J., Sanneman, L. M., Fay, A. J., Fourie, C. K., Choi, C., & Rus, D. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196754 · Cited by 44
Teaching and AI in the postdigital age: Learning from teachers’ perspectives
Moylan, R., Code, J., & O'Brien, H. L. (2024) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104851 · Cited by 60
Human Interaction Smart Subsystem—Extending Speech-Based Human-Robot Interaction Systems with an Implementation of External Smart Sensors
Podpora, M., Gardecki, A., Beniak, R., Klin, B., Vicario, J. L., & Kawala‐Sterniuk, A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20082376 · Cited by 43
Ethical and legal responsibility for Artificial Intelligence
Henz, P. (2021) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-021-00002-4 · Cited by 43
Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making
Zheng, C., Wu, Y., Shi, C., Ma, S., Luo, J., & Ma, X. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581131 · Cited by 53
Managing artificial intelligence in international business: Toward a research agenda on sustainable production and consumption
Hasan, R., & Ojala, A. (2024) · Thunderbird International Business Review · doi:10.1002/tie.22369 · Cited by 56
Machine Learning Processes As Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI Art
Sivertsen, C., Salimbeni, G., Løvlie, A. S., Benford, S., & Zhu, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642855 · Cited by 51
Mixed Initiative Systems for Human-Swarm Interaction: Opportunities and Challenges
Hussein, A., & Abbass, H. A. (2018) · doi:10.1109/sysmc.2018.8509744 · Cited by 41
On the impact of different types of errors on trust in human-robot interaction
Flook, R., Shrinah, A., Wijnen, L., Eder, K., Melhuish, C., & Lemaignan, S. (2019) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.18067.flo · Cited by 41
Investigating Human Perceptions of Trust in Robots for Safe HRI in Home Environments
Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Saunders, J. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3029798.3034822 · Cited by 39
Trust Mediating Reliability–Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human–Swarm Interactions
Hussein, A., Elsawah, S., & Abbass, H. (2019) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720819879273 · Cited by 40
Understandable and trustworthy explainable robots: A sensemaking perspective
Papagni, G., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2020) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0002 · Cited by 49
Optimal guidance strategy for crowd evacuation with multiple exits: A hybrid multiscale modeling approach
Zhang, Z., & Jia, L. (2020) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.075 · Cited by 38
Identifying psychological features of robots that encourage and discourage trust
Plaks, J. E., Rodriguez, L. B., & Ayad, R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107301 · Cited by 38
Human-robot interaction: the impact of robotic aesthetics on anticipated human trust
Pinney, J., Carroll, F., & Newbury, P. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.837 · Cited by 35
Toward a Framework for Trust Building between Humans and Robots in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review of Current Research and Future Directions
Chang, W.-C., & Hasanzadeh, S. (2024) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-5656 · Cited by 37
AI in human teams: effects on technology use, members’ interactions, and creative performance under time scarcity
Shaikh, S. J., & Cruz, I. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01335-5 · Cited by 34
Conceptualizing Overtrust in Robots: Why Do People Trust a Robot That Previously Failed?
Robinette, P., Howard, A., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59719-5_6 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Why bad coffee? Explaining BDI agent behaviour with valuings
Winikoff, M., Sidorenko, G., Dignum, V., & Dignum, F. P. M. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103554 · Cited by 33
Trustworthy Embodied Conversational Agents for Healthcare
Lupetti, M. L., Hagens, E., van der Maden, W., Steegers‐Theunissen, R. P. M., & Rousian, M. (2023) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3571884.3597128 · Cited by 33
Challenges and Opportunities for Replication Science in HRI
Ullman, D. L., Aladia, S., & Malle, B. F. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434073.3444652 · Cited by 35
Human-Robot Trust
Ullman, D. L., & Malle, B. F. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3029798.3038423 · Cited by 32
Trust in Vocal Human–Robot Interaction: Implications for Robot Voice Design
Torre, I., & White, L. (2020) · Prosody, phonology and phonetics · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_16 · Cited by 31
“I just shared your responses”
Sannon, S., Stoll, B., DiFranzo, D. J., Jung, M. F., & Bazarova, N. N. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3375188 · Cited by 31
Human Trust After Robot Mistakes: Study of the Effects of Different Forms of Robot Communication
Ye, S., Neville, G., Schrum, M., Gombolay, M., Chernova, S., & Howard, A. M. (2019) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956424 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Robot-Guided Evacuation as a Paradigm for Human-Robot Interaction Research
Wagner, A. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.701938 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Hiding Behind Machines: Artificial Agents May Help to Evade Punishment
Feier, T., Gogoll, J., & Uhl, M. (2022) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00372-7 · Cited by 31
Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research
Lee, H. R., Cheon, E., Lim, C., & Fischer, K. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889496 · Cited by 32
Deep learning, transparency, and trust in human robot teamwork
Lewis, M., Li, H.-A., & Sycara, K. (2021) · Trust in Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00014-9 · Cited by 29

Authors: Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R.
Affiliations: Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID: Robinette, Paul
Howard, Ayanna M.
Wagner, Alan R.
Venue: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
Publisher: IEEE
Published: 2016-03
Pages: 101-108
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740
OpenAlex: W4254148040
Cited by: 468
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4
FWCI: 48.41
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Funders: Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords: trust in robots, emergency evacuation, human-robot interaction, guidance and navigation, emergency response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks