Cited by 468Social Robot Interaction and HRIHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Robinette, Paul, Li, Wenchen, Allen, Robert, Howard, Ayanna M., Wagner, Alan R.·2016·2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

DOI 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Robots have the potential to save lives in emergency scenarios, but could have an equally disastrous effect if participants overtrust them. To explore this concept, we performed an experiment where a participant interacts with a robot in a non-emergency task to experience its behavior and then chooses whether to follow the robot's instructions in an emergency or not. Artificial smoke and fire alarms were used to add a sense of urgency. To our surprise, all 26 participants followed the robot in the emergency, despite half observing the same robot perform poorly in a navigation guidance task just minutes before. We performed additional exploratory studies investigating different failure modes. Even when the robot pointed to a dark room with no discernible exit the majority of people did not choose to safely exit the way they entered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051 · cited 1×
“Hancock et al. performed a meta-analysis over the existing human-robot trust literature identifying 11 relevant research articles and found that, for these papers, robot performance is most strongly associated with trust [7].”
Background
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696497 · Cited by 494
The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. M. (2010) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7 · Cited by 478
Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems
Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975844 · Cited by 311
Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust
Desai, M., Kaniarasu, P., Medvedev, M., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2013) · 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483596 · Cited by 234
Effect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2648849 · Cited by 205
Self-citation
Report of the technical investigation of The Station nightclub fire
Grosshandler, W. L., Bryner, N. P., Madrzykowski, D. M., & Kuntz, K. (2005) · doi:10.6028/nist.ncstar.2v1 · Cited by 148
Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Human behaviour in fire: the development and maturity of a scholarly study area
Bryan, J. L. (1999) · Fire and Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(199911/12)23:6 · Cited by 60

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

safarik, 2014, An all-time record 97 buildings of 200 meters or higher completed in 2014, CTBUH Year in Review
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 467

Understanding Roboticists' Power through Matrix Guided Technology Power Analysis
Williams, T. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640766 · Cited by 12
From human-system interaction to human-system co-action and back: ethical assessment of generative AI and mutual theory of mind
Richter, F. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00626-z · Cited by 10
Examining Human–Robot Interactions: Design Guidelines for Trust and Acceptance
Calvo-Barajas, N., Rouchitsas, A., & Broo, D. G. (2025) · Springer series in adaptive environments · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78357-9_4 · Cited by 10
Deep Learning–Based Prediction of Human–Robot Trust Dynamics in Future Construction Using Worker Neuropsychophysiological Responses
Chang, W.-C., Garcia, N. F. G., & Hasanzadeh, S. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-6302 · Cited by 10
The scale of artificial intelligence literacy for all (SAIL4ALL): assessing knowledge of artificial intelligence in all adult populations
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Lutz, C. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05978-3 · Cited by 42
Human Trust After Drone Failure: Study of the Effects of Drone Type and Failure Type on Human-Drone Trust
Khavas, Z. R., Majdi, A., Ahmadzadeh, S. R., & Robinette, P. (2023) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR) · doi:10.1109/ur57808.2023.10202489 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Implicit Communication Through Social Distancing
Banisetty, S. B., & Williams, T. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434074.3447222 · Cited by 10
Helping People Through Space and Time: Assistance as a Perspective on Human-Robot Interaction
Newman, B. A., Aronson, R. M., Kitani, K., & Admoni, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.720319 · Cited by 10
Do We Blindly Trust Self-Driving Cars
Andersen, K. E., Köslich, S., Pedersen, B. K. M. K., Weigelin, B. C., & Jensen, L. C. (2017) · Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3029798.3038428 · Cited by 9
Effect of Proactive Interaction on Trust in Autonomous Vehicles
Sun, J., Huang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16083404 · Cited by 10
Attentiveness: A Key Factor in Fostering Affective and Cognitive Trust with Non-Humanoid Robots
Manor, A., Parush, A., & Erel, H. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731320 · Cited by 9
The Effect of Voice and Repair Strategy on Trust Formation and Repair in Human-Robot Interaction
Romeo, M., Torre, I., Maguer, S. L., Sleat, A., Cangelosi, A., & Leite, I. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711938 · Cited by 11
Intelligent Agent Deception and the Influence on Human Trust and Interaction
Rogers, K., & Howard, A. (2021) · IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) · doi:10.1109/arso51874.2021.9542847 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Fresh Start
Wen, R., Hanson, A., Han, Z., & Williams, T. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576959 · Cited by 9
“Are we in this together?”: embedding social identity detection in drones improves emergency coordination
Kordoni, A., Gavidia-Calderon, C., Levine, M., Bennaceur, A., & Nuseibeh, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146056 · Cited by 10
Making moral decisions with artificial agents as advisors. A fNIRS study
Fabre, E. F., Mouratille, D., Bonnemains, V., Palmiotti, G. P., & Causse, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100096 · Cited by 11
Automation reliability and trust: A Bayesian inference approach
Wang, C., Zhang, C., & Yang, X. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621048 · Cited by 9
IoT based Smart Sensing and Alarming System with Autonomous Guiding Robots for Efficient Fire Emergency Evacuation
Sangeetha, S., Nagayo, A. M., Mohamed, A. B. J. S., Al-Shukaili, N. S., Al-Jahwari, Y. J., Al-Mazroui, Z. A., Al-Oufi, M. K. M. S., & Al-Miqbali, N. A. (2021) · International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) · doi:10.1109/incet51464.2021.9456142 · Cited by 9
Your Robot is Watching: Using Surface Cues to Evaluate the Trustworthiness of Human Actions
Surendran, V., & Wagner, A. R. (2019) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956343 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Assured Human-Autonomy Interaction through Machine Self-Confidence
Aitken, M. S. (2016) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 9
"Comforting and Small Like a House Cat, Big and Intimidating Like a Bodyguard": How Women Perceive and Envision AI Companions as a New Harassment Mitigation Approach in Social VR
Freeman, G., Schulenberg, K., Li, L., Panchanadikar, R., & McNeese, N. J. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713473 · Cited by 8
Robot-Guided Crowd Evacuation in a Railway Hub Station in Case of Emergencies
Zhou, M., Dong, H., Ge, S., Wang, X., & Wang, F. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-022-01594-4 · Cited by 8
In the Rough: Evaluation of Convergence Across Trust Assessment Techniques Using an Autonomous Golf Cart
Tenhundfeld, N. L., Forsyth, J. B., Sprague, N. R., El-Tawab, S., Cotter, J. E., & Vangsness, L. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434231206422 · Cited by 8
A Robot in a Human–Robot Group Learns Group Norms and Makes Decisions Through Indirect Mutual Interaction with Humans
Fuse, Y., Takenouchi, H., & Tokumaru, M. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.20965/jaciii.2020.p0169 · Cited by 8
Impacts of Human Robot Proxemics on Human Concentration-Training Games with Humanoid Robots
Liu, L., Liu, Y., & Gao, X. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9070894 · Cited by 8
Who do you follow?
Ullrich, D., Butz, A. M., & Diefenbach, S. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3173386.3177014 · Cited by 8
Overtrust of Robots in High-Risk Scenarios
Xu, J. C. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278786 · Cited by 8
That's not a Good Idea: A Robot Changes Your Behavior Against Social Engineering
Pasquali, D., Kothig, A., Aroyo, A. M., Muñoz, J. E., Dautenhahn, K., Bencetti, S., Rea, F., & Sciutti, A. (2023) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3623809.3623879 · Cited by 7
A matter of consequences
Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Walters, M. L. (2023) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.21025.ros · Cited by 7
Customisation’s impact on strengthening affective bonds and decision-making with socially assistive robots
Ahmed, M. S., Giuliani, M., Leonards, U., & Bremner, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1384610 · Cited by 7
Beyond the monotonic: Enhancing human-robot interaction through affective communication
Klüber, K., & Onnasch, L. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100131 · Cited by 7
Mapping trust and cultural dimensions in Human-Robot Interaction: A scoping review approach
Cirasa, C., & Conti, D. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100763 · Cited by 7
The Imperfectly Relatable Robot
Harrison, K., Perugia, G., Correia, F., Somasundaram, K., van Waveren, S., Paiva, A., & Loutfi, A. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3579952 · Cited by 7
Presentation matters for AI-generated clinical advice
Ghassemi, M. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01721-7 · Cited by 9
Beyond Fairness in Computer Vision: A Holistic Approach to Mitigating Harms and Fostering Community-Rooted Computer Vision Research
Gebru, T., & Denton, E. (2024) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000102 · Cited by 8
Collaborative Robots with Cognitive Capabilities for Industry 4.0 and Beyond
Sandini, G., Sciutti, A., & Morasso, P. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5040092 · Cited by 7
Comfort or Promise? Investigating the Effect of Trust Repair Strategies of Intelligent Vehicle System on Trust and Intention to Use from a Perspective of Social Cognition
Feng, Y., & Tan, H. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06053-3_11 · Cited by 7
Evaluating a Mechanism for Explaining BDI Agent Behaviour
Winikoff, M., & Sidorenko, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40878-6_2 · Cited by 7
Controlling in einer „Industrie 4.0“ – Neue Möglichkeiten und neue Grenzen für die Steuerung von Unternehmen
Obermaier, R., & Grottke, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18488-9_5 · Cited by 7
Simulations and Self-Driving Cars
Pedersen, B. K. M. K., Andersen, K. E., Köslich, S., Weigelin, B. C., & Kuusinen, K. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3173386.3176987 · Cited by 7
Asking the right questions: a governance approach to uphold human autonomy in artificial intelligence
Subías-Beltrán, P., Unceta, I., de Lecuona, I., & Pujol, O. (2025) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02611-4 · Cited by 6
Examining Physiological Response and Facial Expression as Indicators of Trust in a Robot Partner
Green, H. N., & Iqbal, T. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3773895 · Cited by 6
Trust in Robot Self-Defense: People Would Prefer a Competent, Tele-Operated Robot That Tries to Help*
Duarte, E. K., Shiomi, M., Vinel, A. V., & Cooney, M. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309336 · Cited by 6
Do Mistakes Matter? Comparing Trust Responses of Different Age Groups to Errors Made by Physically Assistive Robots
Wald, S., Puthuveetil, K. P., & Erickson, Z. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731271 · Cited by 6
Blind Trust: How Making a Device Humanoid Reduces the Impact of Functional Errors on Trust
Vattheuer, C., Baecker, A. N., Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Seo, S. H., Rea, D. J., & Young, J. E. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_18 · Cited by 7
Robots Are Moral Actors: Unpacking Current Moral HRI Research Through a Moral Foundations Lens
Doyle-Burke, D., & Haring, K. S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_15 · Cited by 6
System-Wide Trust: The Impact of an Error in a Multi-component System
O’Hear, E. H., Atchley, A., Gholston, S. E., Weger, K., Mesmer, B. L., & Tenhundfeld, N. L. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661119 · Cited by 6
I’m Only Human: The Effects of Trust Dampening by Anthropomorphic Agents
Jensen, T., & Khan, M. M. H. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_21 · Cited by 6
Theory of Mind and Trust in Human-Robot Navigation
McKenna, P. E., Romeo, M., Pimentel, J. M., Diab, M., Moujahid, M., Hastie, H., & Demiris, Y. (2023) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3597512.3597514 · Cited by 6
Why There is No Definition of Trust: A Systems Approach With a Metamodel Representation
Schroepfer, P., & Pradalier, C. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309503 · Cited by 6
Principles of evacuation robots
Wagner, A. R. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815367-3.00008-6 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
The Concept of Robotics Complex for Transporting Special Equipment to Emergency Zones and Evacuating Wounded People
Mamchenko, M., Петрович, А. П., Kontsevoy, A., Plotnikova, A., & Gromov, Y. Y. (2020) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5580-0_17 · Cited by 6
Fluent Coordination in Proximate Human Robot Teaming
Matsumoto, S., & Riek, L. D. (2019) · Robotics: Science and Systems · Cited by 6
Emotionale Reaktionen älterer Menschen gegenüber Sozial Assistiven Robotern
Ruf, E., Pauli, C., & Misoch, S. (2022) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-022-00641-w · Cited by 7
Using Physiological Measures, Gaze, and Facial Expressions to Model Human Trust in a Robot Partner
Green, H. N., & Iqbal, T. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127472 · Cited by 5
TURIN: A coding system for Trust in hUman Robot INteraction
Hulcelle, M., Varni, G., Rollet, N., & Clavel, C. (2021) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597448 · Cited by 5
Unpretty Please: Ostensibly Polite Wakewords Discourage Politeness in both Robot-Directed and Human-Directed Communication
Wen, R., Barton, B., Fauré, S., & Williams, T. (2022) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3536221.3556615 · Cited by 5
Human Non-Compliance with Robot Spatial Ownership Communicated via Augmented Reality: Implications for Human-Robot Teaming Safety
Chang, C. T., Luebbers, M. B., Hebert, M. R., & Hayes, B. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161277 · Cited by 5
Emotion Components and Understanding in Humans and Machines
Bellon, J. (2023) · Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-37641-3_2 · Cited by 6
Understanding and Mitigating Authority Bias in Business and Beyond
Gültekin, D. G. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1766-2.ch004 · Cited by 5
Looks Can Permit Deceiving: How Reward or Punishment Decisions are Influenced by Robot Embodiment
Rogers, K., & Howard, A. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434074.3447128 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Living with Robots
Aylett, R. S., & Vargas, P. A. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13487.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Predicting Human Operator’s Decisions Based on Prospect Theory
de Souza, P. E. U., Chanel, C. P. C., Mailliez, M., & Dehais, F. (2020) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwcomp/iwaa016 · Cited by 5
If you trust me, I will trust you: the role of reciprocity in human-robot trust.Preprint
Zonca, J., Folsø, A., & Sciutti, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Does human-robot trust need reciprocity?Preprint
Zonca, J., & Sciutti, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.09359 · Cited by 5
“But You Shouldn’t Blame Me”: A Cross-National Comparison of the Effects of Performance Failures and Trust Repairs in Human–Robot Interactions
Zhang, X., & Lee, S. K. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3746461 · Cited by 6
Machiavelli for robots: Strategic robot failure, deception, and trust
Sætra, H. S. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309455 · Cited by 4
The Price of Intelligence
Russinovich, M., Salem, A., Zanella-Béguelin, S., & Zunger, Y. (2025) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3749447 · Cited by 5
Only Those Who Can Obey Can Disobey: The Intentional Implications of Artificial Agent Disobedience
Arnold, T., Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20179-0_9 · Cited by 4
Beyond Dyadic Interactions: Assessing Trust Networks in Multi-Human-Robot Teams
Yadav, A., & Mehta, R. K. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640576 · Cited by 4
Performing a Task Alongside a Robot: Exploring the Impact of Social Comparison
Yaar, G., Oberlender, A., Saadon, N. H., Zuckerman, O., & Erel, H. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3651055 · Cited by 4
Towards Engineering Explainable Autonomous Systems
Winikoff, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71152-7_9 · Cited by 4
Humans and Robots: A New Social Order in Perspective?
Sequeira, J. S. (2019) · International series on intelligent systems, control and automation: science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_3 · Cited by 4
Trust Dynamics and Transfer across Human-Robot Interaction Tasks: Bayesian and Neural Computational Models
Soh, H., Pan, S. L., Chen, M., & Hsu, D. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/868 · Cited by 4
How to Tune Your Draggin’: Can Body Language Mitigate Face Threat in Robotic Noncompliance?
Naughton, A., & Williams, T. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_21 · Cited by 4
Emotion-aware Human–Robot Interaction and Social Robots
Tian, L., Oviatt, S. L., Muszyński, M., Chamberlain, B. C., Healey, J., & Sano, A. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3502398.3502407 · Cited by 4
Extended norms: locating accountable decision-making in contexts of human-robot interaction
Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. J. (2022) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-022-00645-6 · Cited by 4
Machine Capacity of Judgment: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Making Machine Intelligence Transparent to End-Users
Tamò‐Larrieux, A., Ciortea, A., & Mayer, S. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102088 · Cited by 4
Perceived Trustworthiness of an Interactive Robotic System
Graf, L. S., Torkar, M., Stuckelmaier, E., Sichler, R., Malafosse, P., Fischer, K., & Palinko, O. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889667 · Cited by 4
Mutual Understanding in Situated Interactions with Conversational User Interfaces: Theory, Studies, and ComputationPreprint
Kontogiorgos, D. (2022) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/fpts4 · Cited by 4
Degrees of Freedom: A Storytelling Game that Supports Technology Literacy about Social Robots
Mott, T., Higger, M., Bejarano, A., & Williams, T. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731340 · Cited by 3
The Price of Intelligence
Russinovich, M., Salem, A., Zanella-Béguelin, S., & Zunger, Y. (2024) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3711679 · Cited by 3
A User Study Evaluation of Predictive Formal Modelling at Runtime in Human-Swarm Interaction
Abioye, A. O., Hunt, W., Gu, Y., Schneiders, E., Naiseh, M., Archibald, B., Sevegnani, M., Ramchurn, S. D., Fischer, J. E., & Soorati, M. D. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3727989 · Cited by 3
Humans Follow AI-Advice by (un-)trustworthy Virtual Agents in Ethical Healthcare Decisions
Dübeler, D., Schütze, C., Müller, A., Richter, B., & Wrede, B. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94171-9_24 · Cited by 3
“Even explanations will not help in trusting [this] fundamentally biased system”: A Predictive Policing Case-Study
Mehrotra, S., Gadiraju, U., Bittner, E. A. C., van Delden, F., Jonker, C. M., & Tielman, M. L. (2025) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3699682.3728343 · Cited by 6
When Robots Say Sorry in High-Stake Environment: Emotional Connection Might Matter More Than Explanations
Tang, L. R., & Bashir, M. N. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms65439.2025.11154364 · Cited by 3
Autonomous and Intervention-Based Trust Calibration in Construction Robots: Impact on Unsafe Behavior
Lin, J., Li, Q., Zhang, K., & Zhang, C. (2025) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16859 · Cited by 3
The vigilance paradox: automation reliance inside the modern SOC
Tilbury, J., & Flowerday, S. (2026) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-08-2025-0318 · Cited by 3
Would you Trust a Robot that Distrusts you?
Kelch, Y., Kluge, A., & Kunold, L. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640757 · Cited by 3
Combating Spatial Disorientation in a Dynamic Self-Stabilization Task Using AI Assistants
Mannan, S. A., Hansen, P., Vimal, V. P., Davies, H., DiZio, P. A., & Krishnaswamy, N. (2024) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3687272.3688329 · Cited by 4
Multidisciplinary perspectives on human‑AI team trust
Tielman, M. L., Bailey, M. E., Frattolillo, F., Jorge, C. C., Ulfert, A., & Meyer-Vitali, A. (2025) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.24048.tie · Cited by 5
Would you Take Advice from a Robot? Developing a Framework for Inferring Human-Robot Trust in Time-Sensitive Scenarios
Xu, J. C., & Howard, A. (2020) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223544 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Introduction: The evolution of trust in human-robot interaction
Lyons, J., & Nam, C. S. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.09988-3 · Cited by 3
Ethical Design of a Robot Platform for Disabled Employees: Some Practical Methodological Considerations
Colombino, T., Gallo, D., Shreepriya, S., Im, Y., & Cha, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.643160 · Cited by 3
AI for Decision-Making in Connected Business
Haefner, N., & Morf, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76897-3_12 · Cited by 3
Obedience to robot. Humanoid robot as an experimenter in Milgram paradigm
Grzyb, T., Maj, K., & Doliński, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100010 · Cited by 3
An Investigation of Social Influence of Group Norms on Human in Human–Robot Groups
Fuse, Y., & Tokumaru, M. (2019) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci44817.2019.9002796 · Cited by 4
Hiding Behind Machines: When Blame Is Shifted to Artificial AgentsPreprint
Feier, T., Gogoll, J., & Uhl, M. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11465 · Cited by 3
Jointly navigating through RRI in practice: lessons from technology design
Patel, M., Weerawardhana, S., & Moreau, L. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2425091 · Cited by 2
"Who Should I Believe?": User Interpretation and Decision-Making When a Family Healthcare Robot Contradicts Human Memory
Wang, H., Calvo-Barajas, N., Winkle, K., & Castellano, G. (2025) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217583 · Cited by 2

Authors: Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R.
Affiliations: Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID: Robinette, Paul
Howard, Ayanna M.
Wagner, Alan R.
Venue: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
Publisher: IEEE
Published: 2016-03
Pages: 101-108
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2016.7451740
OpenAlex: W4254148040
Cited by: 468
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4
FWCI: 48.41
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Funders: Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords: trust in robots, emergency evacuation, human-robot interaction, guidance and navigation, emergency response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks