The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classifying without discriminating
Abstract
Classification models usually make predictions on the basis of training data. If the training data is biased towards certain groups or classes of objects, e.g., there is racial discrimination towards black people, the learned model will also show discriminatory behavior towards that particular community. This partial attitude of the learned model may lead to biased outcomes when labeling future unlabeled data objects. Often, however, impartial classification results are desired or even required by law for future data objects in spite of having biased training data. In this paper, we tackle this problem by introducing a new classification scheme for learning unbiased models on biased training data. Our method is based on massaging the dataset by making the least intrusive modifications which lead to an unbiased dataset. On this modified dataset we then learn a non-discriminating classifier. The proposed method has been implemented and experimental results on a credit approval dataset show promising results: in all experiments our method is able to reduce the prejudicial behavior for future classification significantly without loosing too much predictive accuracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of the previous work has primarily focused on settings where the outcome or protected variable is binary.”
From An algorithm for removing sensitive information: Application to race-independent recidivism prediction (2019) · cites this paper as Kamiran and Calders (2009)
In the citing paper
“Methodology for achieving statistical parity has centered on removing information about the protected variables from the training data by transforming the training data.”
From An algorithm for removing sensitive information: Application to race-independent recidivism prediction (2019) · cites this paper as Kamiran and Calders (2009)
In the citing paper
“This procedure is limited to binary outcome data and the adjusted data is not re-usable in the sense that one could not then use the covariates to estimate relationships with other outcome variables and still be ensured of nondiscriminatory outcomes.”
From An algorithm for removing sensitive information: Application to race-independent recidivism prediction (2019) · cites this paper as Kamiran and Calders (2009)
In the citing paper
“Prior work on detecting discrimination has focused on measuring correlation or mutual information between inputs and outputs [79], discrepancies in the fractions of inputs that produce a given output [18, 19, 39-42, 87-89, 91], or discrepancies in output probability distributions [51].”
From Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination (2017) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
(1973) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 12,895
UCI Repository of machine learning databases
Blake, C. L. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,582
Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis.
Clarke, M., Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344977 · Cited by 3,258
Samarati, P., & Sweeney, L. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6625469 · Cited by 1,323
Discrimination-aware data mining
Pedreshi, D., Ruggieri, S., & Turini, F. (2008) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1401890.1401959 · Cited by 676
Interestingness of frequent itemsets using Bayesian networks as background knowledge
Jaroszewicz, S., & Simovici, D. A. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014074 · Cited by 128
Fast discovery of unexpected patterns in data, relative to a Bayesian network
Jaroszewicz, S., & Scheffer, T. (2005) · doi:10.1145/1081870.1081887 · Cited by 44
Knowledge-Based Sampling for Subgroup Discovery
Scholz, M. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11504245_11 · Cited by 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2012) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-011-0463-8 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citation(2013) · Cited by 1,126
Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey
Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., Vidal, M., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Papadopoulos, S., Krasanakis, E., et al. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1356 · Cited by 1,043
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943
“Kamiran and Calders [21] and Hajian and Domingo-Ferrer [18]seek to modify datasets to remove any information that might permit discrimination.”
BackgroundInfluentialThree naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification.
Calders, T., & Verwer, S. (2010) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x · Cited by 764
Self-citationAlgorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S., Choudhary, S., Hamilton, E. P., & Roth, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287589 · Cited by 601
A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3494672 · Cited by 598
Building Classifiers with Independency Constraints
Calders, T., Kamiran, F., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2009.83 · Cited by 468
Self-citationFairness testing: testing software for discrimination
Galhotra, S., Brun, Y., & Meliou, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3106237.3106277 · Cited by 405
FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networks
Xu, D., Yuan, S., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622525 · Cited by 379
Inherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Discrimination Aware Decision Tree Learning
Kamiran, F., Calders, T., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2010.50 · Cited by 303
Self-citationOneto, L., & Chiappa, S. (2020) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43883-8_7 · Cited by 328
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3433949 · Cited by 262
A survey on datasets for fairness‐aware machine learning
Le Quy, T., Roy, A., Iosifidis, V., Zhang, W., & Ntoutsi, E. (2022) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1452 · Cited by 261
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Yang, K., Qinami, K., Fei-Fei, L., Deng, J., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3375709 · Cited by 254
On the (im)possibility of fairness
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07236 · Cited by 247
Dai, E., & Wang, S. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3437963.3441752 · Cited by 273
Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guarantees
Celis, L. E., Huang, L., Keswani, V., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287586 · Cited by 231
van Giffen, B., Herhausen, D., & Fahse, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.076 · Cited by 230
Value-Sensitive Algorithm Design: Method, Case Study, and Lessons
Zhu, H., Yu, B., Halfaker, A., & Terveen, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274463 · Cited by 220
A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Greco, G., Regoli, D., Penco, I. G., & Cosentini, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1 · Cited by 292
Human factors in model interpretability: Industry practices, challenges, and needs
Hong, S. R., Hullman, J., & Bertini, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392878 · Cited by 219
Fairness in credit scoring: Assessment, implementation and profit implications
Kozodoi, N., Jacob, J., & Lessmann, S. (2022) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.023 · Cited by 198
Speicher, T., Heidari, H., Grgic-Hlaca, N., Gummadi, K. P., Singla, A., Weller, A., & Zafar, M. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220046 · Cited by 207
Scheuerman, M. K., Wade, K., Lustig, C., & Brubaker, J. R. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392866 · Cited by 193
FairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramer, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2017.29 · Cited by 171
FairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications
Tramèr, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J.-P., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Lin, H. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.02377 · Cited by 171
Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine
Xu, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, W. H., Ning, Y., Shenkman, E. A., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2022) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104250 · Cited by 170
A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracy
Fish, B., Kun, J., & Lelkes, Á. D. (2016) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611974348.17 · Cited by 179
Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness ConstraintsPreprint
Donini, M., Oneto, L., Ben-David, S., Shawe-Taylor, J. S., & Pontil, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08626 · Cited by 190
D’Amour, A., Srinivasan, H., Atwood, J. R., Baljekar, P. N., Sculley, D., & Halpern, Y. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372878 · Cited by 191
Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines
Chen, L., Ma, R., Hannák, A., & Wilson, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174225 · Cited by 155
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152
Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning
Jiang, H., & Nachum, O. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04966 · Cited by 152
Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness
Salimi, B., Rodriguez, L., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3299869.3319901 · Cited by 145
Preventing undesirable behavior of intelligent machines
Thomas, P. S., da Silva, B. C., Barto, A. G., Giguere, S., Brun, Y., & Brunskill, E. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag3311 · Cited by 156
Towards trustworthy LLMs: a review on debiasing and dehallucinating in large language models
Lin, Z., Guan, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10896-y · Cited by 141
Johndrow, J. E., & Lum, K. (2019) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/18-aoas1201 · Cited by 141
A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity
Heidari, H., Loi, M., Gummadi, K. P., & Krause, A. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287584 · Cited by 151
Fairness in rankings and recommendations: an overview
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-021-00697-y · Cited by 177
Brun, Y., & Meliou, A. (2018) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3236024.3264838 · Cited by 138
Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Making
Aghaei, S., Azizi, M. J., & Vayanos, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011418 · Cited by 135
Why Unbiased Computational Processes Can Lead to Discriminative Decision Procedures
Calders, T., & Žliobaitė, I. (2013) · Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_3 · Cited by 128
Self-citationAdaptive Sensitive Reweighting to Mitigate Bias in Fairness-aware Classification
Krasanakis, E., Spyromitros-Xioufis, E., Papadopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186133 · Cited by 127
Žliobaitė, I., & Custers, B. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9182-5 · Cited by 125
Invariant Representations without Adversarial TrainingPreprint
Moyer, D., Gao, S., Brekelmans, R., Steeg, G. V., & Galstyan, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.09458 · Cited by 121
Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognition
Chen, Y., & Joo, J. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01471 · Cited by 126
Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddings
Kaneko, M., & Bollegala, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1160 · Cited by 127
Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI
Álvarez, J. M., Colmenarejo, A. B., Elobaid, A., Fabbrizzi, S., Fahimi, M., Ferrara, A., Ghodsi, S., Mougan, C., Papageorgiou, I. T., Lobo, P. R., et al. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09746-w · Cited by 147
Toward creating a fairer ranking in search engine results
Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102138 · Cited by 114
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_37 · Cited by 235
Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?Preprint
DeVries, T., Misra, I., Wang, C., & van der Maaten, L. J. P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02659 · Cited by 141
Kamiran, F., Žliobaitė, I., & Calders, T. (2013) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-012-0584-8 · Cited by 99
Self-citationThemis: automatically testing software for discrimination
Angell, R., Johnson, B., Brun, Y., & Meliou, A. (2018) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3236024.3264590 · Cited by 94
Quantifying the Impact of User Attentionon Fair Group Representation in Ranked Lists
Sapiezynski, P., Zeng, W., E Robertson, R., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317595 · Cited by 92
Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: An Excursion Through the Lens of Causality
Khademi, A., Lee, S., Foley, D., & Honavar, V. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313559 · Cited by 95
FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifier
Zhang, W., & Ntoutsi, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/205 · Cited by 85
Saghiri, A. M., Vahidipour, S. M., Jabbarpour, M. R., Sookhak, M., & Forestiero, A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12084054 · Cited by 122
Fairness issues, current approaches, and challenges in machine learning models
Jui, T. D., & Rivas, P. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-023-02083-2 · Cited by 100
Fairea: a model behaviour mutation approach to benchmarking bias mitigation methods
Hort, M., Zhang, J. M., Sarro, F., & Harman, M. (2021) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3468264.3468565 · Cited by 90
Classification with No Discrimination by Preferential Sampling
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. T. (2010) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 78
Self-citationTransparency in Fair Machine Learning: the Case of Explainable Recommender Systems
Abdollahi, B., & Nasraoui, O. (2018) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_2 · Cited by 78
Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair RepresentationsPreprint
Zhao, H., & Gordon, G. J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08386 · Cited by 87
Achieving Causal Fairness through Generative Adversarial Networks
Xu, D., Wu, Y., Yuan, S., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/201 · Cited by 76
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez-Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2015) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 75
Non-Discriminatory Machine Learning through Convex Fairness Criteria
Goel, N., Yaghini, M., & Faltings, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278722 · Cited by 79
Wasserstein Fair ClassificationPreprint
Jiang, R., Pacchiano, A., Stepleton, T., Jiang, H., & Chiappa, S. (2019) · Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.12059 · Cited by 225
Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representations
Sarhan, M. H., Navab, N., Eslami, A., & Albarqouni, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58526-6_44 · Cited by 69
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603203 · Cited by 67
A brief review on algorithmic fairness
Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2022) · Management System Engineering · doi:10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z · Cited by 88
Taking Advantage of Multitask Learning for Fair Classification
Oneto, L., Doninini, M., Elders, A., & Pontil, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314255 · Cited by 64
The many dimensions of algorithmic fairness in educational applications
Loukina, A., Madnani, N., & Zechner, K. (2019) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4401 · Cited by 64
Fair regression for health care spending
Zink, A., & Rose, S. (2019) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13206 · Cited by 61
Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination
Pedreschi, D., Ruggieri, S., & Turini, F. (2009) · Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/1568234.1568252 · Cited by 55
Combating discrimination using Bayesian networks
Mancuhan, K., & Clifton, C. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-014-9156-4 · Cited by 55
Fair Forests: Regularized Tree Induction to Minimize Model Bias
Raff, E., Sylvester, J., & Mills, S. (2017) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278742 · Cited by 79
Managing Bias in Machine Learning Projects
Fahse, T., Huber, V., & van Giffen, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_7 · Cited by 57
D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias
Ghai, B., & Mueller, K. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209484 · Cited by 77
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems—A Fish-eye View
Orphanou, K., Otterbacher, J., Kleanthous, S., Batsuren, K., Giunchiglia, F., Bogina, V., Tal, A. S., Hartman, A., & Kuflik, T. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527152 · Cited by 58
Pérez-Suay, A., Laparra, V., Mateo‐García, G., Muñoz-Marı́, J., Gómez‐Chova, L., & Camps‐Valls, G. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_21 · Cited by 66
Albarghouthi, A., & Vinitsky, S. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287588 · Cited by 52
Fairness Behind a Veil of Ignorance: A Welfare Analysis for Automated Decision MakingPreprint
Heidari, H., Ferrari, C., Gummadi, K. P., & Krause, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.04959 · Cited by 52
Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments
Berk, R. (2019) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12206 · Cited by 50
Nakao, Y., Strappelli, L., Stumpf, S., Naseer, A., Regoli, D., & Gamba, G. D. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2067936 · Cited by 66
Understanding and Improving Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Multi-Task Learning
Wang, Y., Wang, X., Beutel, A., Prost, F., Chen, J., & Chi, E. H. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467326 · Cited by 50
FNNC: Achieving Fairness through Neural Networks
Padala, M., & Gujar, S. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/315 · Cited by 80
Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Experts
Keswani, V., Lease, M., & Kenthapadi, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462516 · Cited by 45
“The above method is also equivalent to assigning group-specific weights to the samples [38, 25].”
MethodBuilding Better Open-Source Tools to Support Fairness in Automated Scoring
Madnani, N., Loukina, A., von Davier, A. A., Burstein, J. C., & Cahill, A. (2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1605 · Cited by 45
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603207 · Cited by 49
Rule Protection for Indirect Discrimination Prevention in Data Mining
Hajian, S., Domingo‐Ferrer, J., & Martínez-Ballesté, A. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22589-5_20 · Cited by 44
On Discrimination Discovery and Removal in Ranked Data using Causal Graph
Wu, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2018) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220087 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamiran, F., & Calders, T.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Venue
- 2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-02
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2157928966
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- algorithmic discrimination, biased training data, racial discrimination, credit approval, algorithmic fairness, prediction accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
