Cited by 303Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Mining Algorithms and Applications

Discrimination Aware Decision Tree Learning

Open access
Kamiran, Faisal, Calders, Toon, Pechenizkiy, Mykola·2010·2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

Recently, the following discrimination aware classification problem was introduced: given a labeled dataset and an attribute B, find a classifier with high predictive accuracy that at the same time does not discriminate on the basis of the given attribute B. This problem is motivated by the fact that often available historic data is biased due to discrimination, e.g., when B denotes ethnicity. Using the standard learners on this data may lead to wrongfully biased classifiers, even if the attribute B is removed from training data. Existing solutions for this problem consist in “cleaning away” the discrimination from the dataset before a classifier is learned. In this paper we study an alternative approach in which the non-discrimination constraint is pushed deeply into a decision tree learner by changing its splitting criterion and pruning strategy. Experimental evaluation shows that the proposed approach advances the state-of-the-art in the sense that the learned decision trees have a lower discrimination than models provided by previous methods, with little loss in accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdm.2010.50

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamiran, F., Calders, T., & Pechenizkiy, M.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-12
Pages
869-874
ISSN
1550-4786 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150997454
Cited by
303
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
FWCI
44.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
decision tree, algorithmic fairness, training data bias, splitting criteria, tree pruning, ethnic prejudice, prediction accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review