Cited by 5Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Economy and Work TransformationSharing Economy and Platforms

Determinant Factors to Become a Gig Worker in an Online Course

Alif, Ifa, Sucahyo, Yudho Giri, Gandhi, Arfive·2020·2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS)

Abstract

As the trending learning system, online course has actualized the concept of gig economy. People can participate as a gig worker using these roles: a tutor, a teacher, and a content creator in an online course while the students are clients. Some problems have occurred as a relatively new business model in Indonesia, the gig economy did not offer stable and fixed employment, and most of gig workers had no education background. This research aimed to look for determinant factors that motivate people to become gig workers in an online course. This brought Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as foundations. Relying on a quantitative approach in a questionnaire, eleven hypotheses were examined using Partial List Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 187 respondents took part to expose their perception about the candidate of determinant factors. Its result distinguished eight accepted hypotheses, while three others were rejected. This research captured the following variables as determinant factors with a positive relationship: social influence, the factors of benefit, personal interest, and economic value. In contrast, the perceived risk was a negative determinant factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icacsis51025.2020.9263168

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working on digital labor platforms provides an easily accessible source of employment income.

    “Working on digital labor platforms provides an easily accessible source of employment income (e.g., Alif et al., 2020;Churchill & Craig, 2019;Hoang et al., 2020).”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Alif et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alif, I., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Gandhi, A.
Affiliations
University of Indonesia (ID)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-17
Volume
23
Pages
329-334
OpenAlex
W3107524927
Cited by
5
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
gig economy, online courses, gig workers, online tutoring, content creation, technology acceptance model, UTAUT, social influence, risk perception, personal interests, economic value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review