Cited by 685Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classification

Azizi, Shekoofeh, Mustafa, Basil, Ryan, Fiona, Beaver, Zachary, Freyberg, Jan, Deaton, Jonathan, Loh, Aaron, Karthikesalingam, Alan +4 more·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Self-supervised pretraining followed by supervised fine-tuning has seen success in image recognition, especially when labeled examples are scarce, but has received limited attention in medical image analysis. This paper studies the effectiveness of self-supervised learning as a pre-training strategy for medical image classification. We conduct experiments on two distinct tasks: dermatology condition classification from digital camera images and multi-label chest X-ray classification, and demonstrate that self-supervised learning on ImageNet, followed by additional self-supervised learning on unlabeled domain-specific medical images significantly improves the accuracy of medical image classifiers. We introduce a novel Multi-Instance Contrastive Learning (MICLe) method that uses multiple images of the underlying pathology per patient case, when available, to construct more informative positive pairs for self-supervised learning. Combining our contributions, we achieve an improvement of 6.7% in top-1 accuracy and an improvement of 1.1% in mean AUC on dermatology and chest X-ray classification respectively, outperforming strong supervised baselines pretrained on ImageNet. In addition, we show that big self-supervised models are robust to distribution shift and can learn efficiently with a small number of labeled medical images.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00346

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foundation models' strong feature representations enable data-efficient applications, requiring fewer labeled samples.

    “Their strong feature representations also enable data-efficient applications26,27, requiring fewer labeled samples, which is particularly crucial for medical domains in which expert-annotated data are often limited.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azizi, S., Mustafa, B., Ryan, F., Beaver, Z., Freyberg, J., Deaton, J., Loh, A., Karthikesalingam, A., Kornblith, S., Chen, T., Natarajan, V., & Norouzi, M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
3458-3468
OpenAlex
W3120430728
Cited by
685
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 1
FWCI
47.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Keywords
self-supervised pre-training, medical image classification, chest X-ray classification, contrastive learning, domain-specific pre-training, distribution shift robustness, ImageNet pre-training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review