Cited by 231Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposals

Van Gansbeke, Wouter, Vandenhende, Simon, Georgoulis, Stamatios, Van Gool, Luc·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Being able to learn dense semantic representations of images without supervision is an important problem in computer vision. However, despite its significance, this problem remains rather unexplored, with a few exceptions that considered unsupervised semantic segmentation on small-scale datasets with a narrow visual domain. In this paper, we make a first attempt to tackle the problem on datasets that have been traditionally utilized for the supervised case. To achieve this, we introduce a two-step framework that adopts a predetermined mid-level prior in a contrastive optimization objective to learn pixel embeddings. This marks a large deviation from existing works that relied on proxy tasks or end-to-end clustering. Additionally, we argue about the importance of having a prior that contains information about objects, or their parts, and discuss several possibilities to obtain such a prior in an unsupervised manner.Experimental evaluation shows that our method comes with key advantages over existing works. First, the learned pixel embeddings can be directly clustered in semantic groups using K-Means on PASCAL. Under the fully unsupervised setting, there is no precedent in solving the semantic segmentation task on such a challenging benchmark. Second, our representations can improve over strong baselines when transferred to new datasets, e.g. COCO and DAVIS. The code is available1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00990

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some USS methods utilize supervised prior knowledge, making it difficult to evaluate these methods.

    “2) Due to the lack of clear problem definition and standardized evaluation, some methods utilize supervised prior knowledge, e.g., supervised pre-trained network weights [46], supervised edge detection [30], and supervised saliency detection [31], [47], [48], making it difficult to evaluate these methods.”

    From Large-Scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Gansbeke, W., Vandenhende, S., Georgoulis, S., & Van Gool, L.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven/ESAT-PSI
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
10032-10042
OpenAlex
W3129110783
Cited by
231
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 14
FWCI
15.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Funders
KU Leuven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
unsupervised semantic segmentation, contrastive learning, pixel embedding, semantic clustering, domain transfer, COCO, Davis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review