Cited by 636Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Using Simulation and Domain Adaptation to Improve Efficiency of Deep Robotic Grasping

Open access
Bousmalis, Konstantinos, Irpan, Alex, Wohlhart, Paul, Bai, Yunfei, Kelcey, Matthew, Kalakrishnan, Mrinal, Downs, Laura, Ibarz, Julian +4 more·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Instrumenting and collecting annotated visual grasping datasets to train modern machine learning algorithms can be extremely time-consuming and expensive. An appealing alternative is to use off-the-shelf simulators to render synthetic data for which ground-truth annotations are generated automatically. Unfortunately, models trained purely on simulated data often fail to generalize to the real world. We study how randomized simulated environments and domain adaptation methods can be extended to train a grasping system to grasp novel objects from raw monocular RGB images. We extensively evaluate our approaches with a total of more than 25,000 physical test grasps, studying a range of simulation conditions and domain adaptation methods, including a novel extension of pixel-level domain adaptation that we term the GraspGAN. We show that, by using synthetic data and domain adaptation, we are able to reduce the number of real-world samples needed to achieve a given level of performance by up to 50 times, using only randomly generated simulated objects. We also show that by using only unlabeled real-world data and our GraspGAN methodology, we obtain real-world grasping performance without any real-world labels that is similar to that achieved with 939,777 labeled real-world samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2018.8460875

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Domain adaptation could be useful for AIoT applications when deploying models to new scenarios or new working modes of machines [128], [203], [204], [205], [206], e.g., 'synthetic → real', 'daytime → nighttime' or 'clear → rainy'.

    “Domain adaptation could be useful for AIoT applications when deploying models to new scenarios or new working modes of machines [128], [203], [204], [205], [206], e.g., 'synthetic → real', 'daytime → nighttime' or 'clear → rainy'.”
  • Bousmalis et al. propose a deep robotic grasping model named GraspGAN, which bridges the domain gap between synthetic images and real-world ones via pixel-level image translation and a feature-level domain classifier.

    “For example, Bousmalis et al. propose a deep robotic grasping model named GraspGAN [204], which bridges the domain gap between synthetic images and real-world ones via the pixel-level image translation and a feature-level domain classifier.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Springer Handbook of Robotics. Secau- cus, NJ, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2007.
  2. B. Gong, Y. Shi, F. Sha, and K. Grauman, "Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation," in CVPR, 2012.
  3. K. Bousmalis, G. Trigeorgis, N. Silberman, D. Krishnan, and D. Erhan, "Domain separation networks," in NIPS, 2016.
  4. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial nets," in NIPS, 2014.
  5. S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, "Batch Normalization: Accelerating Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift," in ICML, 2015.
  6. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, "U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation," in MICCAI, 2015.
  7. J. Johnson, A. Alahi, and L. Fei-Fei, "Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution," in ECCV. Springer, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bousmalis, K., Irpan, A., Wohlhart, P., Bai, Y., Kelcey, M., Kalakrishnan, M., Downs, L., Ibarz, J., Pastor, P., Konolige, K., Levine, S., & Vanhoucke, V.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-05
Pages
4243-4250
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758237641
Cited by
636
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
133.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
robotic grasping, domain adaptation, sim-to-real transfer, synthetic data, monocular RGB images, object grasping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review