Cited by 48Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesECG Monitoring and Analysis

A Unified Framework for Quality Indexing and Classification of Seismocardiogram Signals

Open access
Zia, Jonathan, Kimball, Jacob, Hersek, Sinan, Shandhi, Md Mobashir Hasan, Semiz, Beren, Inan, Omer T.·2020·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

The seismocardiogram (SCG) is a noninvasively-obtained cardiovascular bio-signal that has gained traction in recent years, however is limited by its susceptibility to noise and motion artifacts. Because of this, signal quality must be assured before data are used to inform clinical care. Common methods of signal quality assurance include signal classification or assignment of a numerical quality index. Such tasks are difficult with SCG because there is no accepted standard for signal morphology. In this paper, we propose a unified method of quality indexing and classification that uses multi-subject-based methods to overcome this challenge. Dynamic-time feature matching is introduced as a novel method of obtaining the distance between a signal and reference template, with this metric, the signal quality index (SQI) is defined as a function of the inverse distance between the SCG and a large set of template signals. We demonstrate that this method is able to stratify SCG signals on held-out subjects based on their level of motion-artifact corruption. This method is extended, using the SQI as a feature for classification by ensembled quadratic discriminant analysis. Classification is validated by demonstrating, for the first time, both detection and localization of SCG sensor misplacement, achieving an F1 score of 0.83 on held-out subjects. This paper may provide a necessary step toward automating the analysis of SCG signals, addressing many of the key limitations and concerns precluding the method from being widely used in clinical and physiological sensing applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2019.2931348

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Senin P, “ Dynamic time warping algorithm review,” Information and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, USA, vol. 855, pp. 1– 23, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zia, J., Kimball, J., Hersek, S., Shandhi, M. M. H., Semiz, B., & Inan, O. T.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2020-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
1080-1092
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2966539497
Cited by
48
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R01HL130619-A1, UL1TR002378)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
seismocardiogram, signal quality index, signal classification, motion artifacts, quadratic discriminant analysis, noise robustness
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Female, Heart, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review