Cited by 184IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet of Things and AI

BEdgeHealth: A Decentralized Architecture for Edge-Based IoMT Networks Using Blockchain

Open access
Nguyen, Dinh C., Pathirana, Pubudu N., Ding, Ming, Seneviratne, Aruna·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The healthcare industry has witnessed significant transformations in e-health services by using mobile-edge computing (MEC) and blockchain to facilitate healthcare operations. Many MEC-blockchain-based schemes have been proposed, but some critical technical challenges still remain, such as low Quality of Services (QoS), data privacy, and system security vulnerabilities. In this article, we propose a new decentralized health architecture, called BEdgeHealth that integrates MEC and blockchain for data offloading and data sharing in distributed hospital networks. First, a data offloading scheme is proposed where mobile devices can offload health data to a nearby MEC server for efficient computation with privacy awareness. Moreover, we design a data-sharing scheme, which enables data exchanges among healthcare users by leveraging blockchain and interplanetary file system. Particularly, a smart contract-based authentication mechanism is integrated with MEC to perform decentralized user access verification at the network edge without requiring any central authority. The real-world experiment results and evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed BEdgeHealth architecture in terms of improved QoS with data privacy and security guarantees, compared to the existing schemes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3058953

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Offloading health data to the cloud for execution incurs excessive network latency, especially when medical data have large sizes.

    “In the traditional AI-based smart healthcare systems, the offloading of health data to the cloud for execution incurs excessive network latency [29], especially when medical data often have large sizes (e.g., audio, images).”

    From Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Blockchain can provide solutions for FL-based edge computing due to decentralization, immutability, and traceability.

    “Fortunately, blockchain as a ledger technology [6] can provide attractive solutions for FL-based intelligent edge computing due to its unique features such as decentralization, immutability, and traceability.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-07-15
Volume
8
Issue
14
Pages
11743-11757
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3129674742
Cited by
184
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 16
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
CSIRO Data61, Australia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
mobile edge computing, blockchain, Internet of Medical Things, decentralized architecture, data offloading, data sharing, smart contracts, authentication, IPFS, data privacy, hospital networks, quality of service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review