Cited by 627Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsCryptography and Data Security

A blockchain-based framework for data sharing with fine-grained access control in decentralized storage systems

Open access
Wang, Shangping, Zhang, Yinglong, Zhang, Yaling·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

In traditional cloud storage systems, attribute-based encryption (ABE) is regarded as an important technology for solving the problem of data privacy and fine-grained access control. However, in all ABE schemes, the private key generator has the ability to decrypt all data stored in the cloud server, which may bring serious problems such as key abuse and privacy data leakage. Meanwhile, the traditional cloud storage model runs in a centralized storage manner, so single point of failure may leads to the collapse of system. With the development of blockchain technology, decentralized storage mode has entered the public view. The decentralized storage approach can solve the problem of single point of failure in traditional cloud storage systems and enjoy a number of advantages over centralized storage, such as low price and high throughput. In this paper, we study the data storage and sharing scheme for decentralized storage systems and propose a framework that combines the decentralized storage system interplanetary file system, the Ethereum blockchain, and ABE technology. In this framework, the data owner has the ability to distribute secret key for data users and encrypt shared data by specifying access policy, and the scheme achieves fine-grained access control over data. At the same time, based on smart contract on the Ethereum blockchain, the keyword search function on the cipher text of the decentralized storage systems is implemented, which solves the problem that the cloud server may not return all of the results searched or return wrong results in the traditional cloud storage systems. Finally, we simulated the scheme in the Linux system and the Ethereum official test network Rinkeby, and the experimental results show that our scheme is feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2851611

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The drawbacks of Wang et al.'s research are that data security and the delay arising from ABE and access control approach were not analyzed.

    “However, the drawbacks of the research is that data security and the delay arising from ABE and access control approach were not analyzed.”
  • Maintenance of standardization across the various agencies.

    “Maintenance of standardization across the various agencies [48].”

    From Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework (2020) · cites this paper as [48]

  • By integrating with blockchain, the MaaS model can be operated in a much more secure and decentralized manner.

    “By integrating with the blockchain, the MaaS model can be operated in a much more secure and decentralized manner [251].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
38437-38450
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810011639
Cited by
627
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 2
FWCI
107.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572019, 61173192)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2016JZ001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
blockchain, decentralized storage, attribute-based encryption, fine-grained access control, data sharing, IPFS, Ethereum smart contracts, cloud storage security, key distribution, data privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review