Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Object-Based Convolutional Neural Network for High-Resolution Imagery Classification

Zhao, Wenzhi, Du, Shihong, Emery, William J.·2017·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Timely and accurate classification and interpretation of high-resolution images are very important for urban planning and disaster rescue. However, as spatial resolution gets finer, it is increasingly difficult to recognize complex patterns in high-resolution remote sensing images. Deep learning offers an efficient strategy to fill the gap between complex image patterns and their semantic labels. However, due to the hierarchical abstract nature of deep learning methods, it is difficult to capture the precise outline of different objects at the pixel level. To further reduce this problem, we propose an object-based deep learning method to accurately classify the high-resolution imagery without intensive human involvement. In this study, high-resolution images were used to accurately classify three different urban scenes: Beijing (China), Pavia (Italy), and Vaihingen (Germany). The proposed method is built on a combination of a deep feature learning strategy and an object-based classification for the interpretation of high-resolution images. Specifically, high-level feature representations extracted through the convolutional neural networks framework have been systematically investigated over five different layer configurations. Furthermore, to improve the classification accuracy, an object-based classification method also has been integrated with the deep learning strategy for more efficient image classification. Experimental results indicate that with the combination of deep learning and object-based classification, it is possible to discriminate different building types in Beijing Scene, such as commercial buildings and residential buildings with classification accuracies above 90%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstars.2017.2680324

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.017 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294332 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383157 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2488681 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.026 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.008 · DOI
  8. 10.1127/1432-8364/2010/0041 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
  10. zhao, 2015, Road extraction in remote sensing images based on spectral and edge analysis, Spectrosc Spectral Anal, 35, 2814
  11. 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842478 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046494 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01431160802139922 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2241444 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2294724 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2345739 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2569141 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1047045 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2543748 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. blaschke, 2000, Object-oriented image processing in an integrated gis/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications, Environ Inf Plann Polit Public, 2, 555
  22. 10.1561/2200000006 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1080/01431161.2016.1207266 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2357078 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.875360 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/01431160512331316838 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2010404 · DOI · Paper page
  28. sun, 0, Deep learning face representation by joint identification-verification, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst Conf, 1988
  29. li, 0, Object bank: A high-level image representation for scene classification & semantic feature sparsification, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst Conf, 1378
  30. 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2309695 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1062157 · DOI

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, W., Du, S., & Emery, W. J.
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Published
2017-07
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
3386-3396
ISSN
  • 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-1535
OpenAlex
W2598551616
Cited by
237
References
8
FWCI
23.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471315)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.