Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiview Deep Learning for Land-Use Classification

Open access
Luus, F. P. S., Salmon, B. P., van den Bergh, F., Maharaj, B. T. J.·2015·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Abstract

A multiscale input strategy for multiview deep learning is proposed for supervised multispectral land-use classification, and it is validated on a well-known data set. The hypothesis that simultaneous multiscale views can improve composition-based inference of classes containing size-varying objects compared to single-scale multiview is investigated. The end-to-end learning system learns a hierarchical feature representation with the aid of convolutional layers to shift the burden of feature determination from hand-engineering to a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). This allows the classifier to obtain problem-specific features that are optimal for minimizing the multinomial logistic regression objective, as opposed to user-defined features which trade optimality for generality. A heuristic approach to the optimization of the DCNN hyperparameters is used, based on empirical performance evidence. It is shown that a single DCNN can be trained simultaneously with multiscale views to improve prediction accuracy over multiple single-scale views. Competitive performance is achieved for the UC Merced data set, where the 93.48% accuracy of multiview deep learning outperforms the 85.37% accuracy of SIFT-based methods and the 90.26% accuracy of unsupervised feature learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2483680

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2309695 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2376034 · DOI · Paper page
  3. sutskever, 0, On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning, Proc 30th ICML, 1139
  4. glorot, 0, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, Proc Int Conf Artif Intell Statist, 249
  5. 10.1109/TELFOR.2014.7034547 · DOI
  6. hu, 0, Unsupervised feature coding on local patch manifold for satellite image scene classification, Proc IEEE IGARSS, 1273
  7. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2351395 · DOI
  8. zhu, 0, Multi-feature probability topic scene classifier for high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery, Proc IEEE IGARSS, 2854
  9. 10.1109/CBMI.2014.6849835 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2357078 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1145/1869790.1869829 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Luus, F. P. S., Salmon, B. P., van den Bergh, F., & Maharaj, B. T. J.
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2015-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
2448-2452
ISSN
  • 1545-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0571
OpenAlex
W2015386604
Cited by
257
References
4
FWCI
45.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
National Research Foundation of South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.