Cited by 110Action Observation and SynchronizationEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain function

Imaging the Social Brain by Simultaneous Hyperscanning during Subject Interaction

Open access
Astolfi, Laura, Toppi, Jlenia, De Vico Fallani, Fabrizio, Vecchiato, Giovanni, Cincotti, Febo, Wilke, Christopher, Yuan, Han, Mattia, Donatella +3 more·2011·IEEE Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Advances in neuroelectric recordings and computational tools allow investigation of interactive brain activity and connectivity in a group of subjects engaged in social interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2011.61

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Groups completing complex, real-life tasks that require goal-directed coordination show increased neural alignment during periods of heightened coordination and communication.

    “Other work has focused on groups of individuals completing complex, real-life tasks that require substantial goal-directed coordination among group members102–106, finding increased neural alignment — both spatial and temporal — during periods of the task that required heightened coordination and communication.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., De Vico Fallani, F., Vecchiato, G., Cincotti, F., Wilke, C., Yuan, H., Mattia, D., Salinari, S., He, B., & Babiloni, F.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Published
2011-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
38-45
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031481383
Cited by
110
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Compagnia di San Paolo
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Laureate Institute for Brain Research, University of Tulsa
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB006433)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
social brain, hyperscanning, social interaction, neuronal connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review