Cited by 833Action Observation and SynchronizationDeception detection and forensic psychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions

Open access
Montague, P·2002·NeuroImage

Abstract

"Plain question and plain answer make the shortest road out of most perplexities." Mark Twain-Life on the Mississippi. A new methodology for the measurement of the neural substrates of human social interaction is described. This technology, termed "Hyperscan," embodies both the hardware and the software necessary to link magnetic resonance scanners through the internet. Hyperscanning allows for the performance of human behavioral experiments in which participants can interact with each other while functional MRI is acquired in synchrony with the behavioral interactions. Data are presented from a simple game of deception between pairs of subjects. Because people may interact both asymmetrically and asynchronously, both the design and the analysis must accommodate this added complexity. Several potential approaches are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2002.1150

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montague, P.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Montague, P
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1159-1164
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129520886
Cited by
833
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh061010-02, 5r21da014883-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-52797, MH61010, R01MH052797)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08DA000367, DA14883, DA-00367, DA 11723, R01DA011723)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
hyperscanning, social interaction, deception, asynchronous interaction, experimental design
MeSH terms
Brain, Computers, Equipment Design, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Play and Playthings, Software, Time Factors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review