Cited by 36Motor Control and AdaptationTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Augmenting the human-machine interface: improving manual accuracy

Riviere, C.N., Khosla, P.K.·2002·Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Abstract

We present a novel application of a neural network to augment manual precision by cancelling involuntary motion. This method may be applied in microsurgery, using either a telerobotic approach or active compensation in a handheld instrument. A feedforward neural network is trained to input the measured trajectory of a handheld tool tip and output the intended trajectory. Use of the neural network decreases rms error in recordings from four subjects by an average of 43.9%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/robot.1997.606884

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1109/ROBOT.1991.131990 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/IROS.1995.525902 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0005-1098(92)90053-I · DOI
  4. riviere, 1996, Accuracy in positioning of handheld instruments, Proc 18th Annu Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
  5. kelley, 1969, The measurement of tracking proficiency, Hum Factors, 11, 43, 10.1177/001872086901100107 · DOI
  6. fahlman, 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, 524
  7. 10.1115/1.3662552 · DOI · Paper page
  8. singhal, 1989, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, 133
  9. 10.1109/IJCNN.1991.155276 · DOI · Paper page
  10. rader, 1997, MADSAM the objective evaluation of microsurgical tools and techniques
  11. 10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761356 · DOI
  12. hunter, 1993, A teleoperated microsurgical robot and associated virtual environment for eye surgery, Presence, 2, 265, 10.1162/pres.1993.2.4.265 · DOI · Paper page
  13. elble, 1990, Tremor
  14. riley, 1987, Evaluating manual control devices for those with tremor disability, J Rehabil Res Dev, 24, 99
  15. 10.1002/micr.1920040310 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1977.tb04297.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. schenker, 1995, Development of a telemanipulator for dexterity enhanced microsurgery, Proc 1st Int Symp Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 81
  18. gonzalez, 1995, A new approach to suppressing abnormal tremor through signal equalization, Proc RESNA Conf, 707
  19. 10.1088/0305-4470/25/4/021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riviere, C. N., & Khosla, P. K.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-11-22
Volume
4
Pages
3546-3550
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153950977
Cited by
36
References
3
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
human-machine interaction, feedforward neural networks, microsurgery, telesurgery, active compensation, hand-held instrument, trajectory tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review