CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 126Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisHuman Pose and Action Recognition

Deep Activity Recognition Models with Triaxial Accelerometers

Open access
Alsheikh, Mohammad Abu, Selim, Ahmed, Niyato, Dusit, Doyle, Linda, Lin, Shaowei, Tan, Hwee-Pink·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1511.04664arXiv 1511.04664
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite the widespread installation of accelerometers in almost all mobile phones and wearable devices, activity recognition using accelerometers is still immature due to the poor recognition accuracy of existing recognition methods and the scarcity of labeled training data. We consider the problem of human activity recognition using triaxial accelerometers and deep learning paradigms. This paper shows that deep activity recognition models (a) provide better recognition accuracy of human activities, (b) avoid the expensive design of handcrafted features in existing systems, and (c) utilize the massive unlabeled acceleration samples for unsupervised feature extraction. Moreover, a hybrid approach of deep learning and hidden Markov models (DL-HMM) is presented for sequential activity recognition. This hybrid approach integrates the hierarchical representations of deep activity recognition models with the stochastic modeling of temporal sequences in the hidden Markov models. We show substantial recognition improvement on real world datasets over state-of-the-art methods of human activity recognition using triaxial accelerometers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.04664

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeepConvLSTM outperforms other deep non-recurrent approaches on the Skoda dataset, improving the best reported result by 6%.

    “From the results in Table 9, we can see that DeepConvLSTM outperforms other deep non-recurrent approaches on the Skoda dataset, improving the best reported result by 6%.”

    From Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition (2016) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Temporal Modeling section (p. 6) reports a deep-model result of 89.38% on the Skoda dataset, providing a result the citing paper could use for comparison. It does not report DeepConvLSTM results or establish that DeepConvLSTM improves on the best prior result by 6%; that comparison is attributed to the citing paper’s Table 9. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The Skoda dataset has been employed to evaluate decision fusion techniques in sensor networks and deep learning techniques, which makes it a suitable dataset to evaluate the proposed solution.

    “The Skoda dataset has been employed to evaluate decision fusion techniques in sensor networks [38] and deep learning techniques [23,43], which makes it a suitable dataset to evaluate our proposed solution.”

    From Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition (2016) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [Altun and Barshan 2010] Altun, K., and Barshan, B. 2010. Human activity recognition using inertial/magnetic sensor units. In Human Behavior Understanding . Springer. 38-51.
  2. [Berchtold et al. 2010] Berchtold, M.; Budde, M.; Gordon, D.; Schmidtke, H. R.; and Beigl, M. 2010. ActiServ: Activity recognition service for mobile phones. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers , 1-8. IEEE.
  3. [Chen et al. 2012] Chen, L.; Hoey, J.; Nugent, C. D.; Cook, D. J.; and Yu, Z. 2012. Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 42(6):790-808.
  4. [Dahl et al. 2012] Dahl, G. E.; Yu, D.; Deng, L.; and Acero, A. 2012. Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 20(1):30-42.
  5. [Erhan et al. 2010] Erhan, D.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A.; Manzagol, P.-A.; Vincent, P.; and Bengio, S. 2010. Why does unsupervised pre-training help deep learning? The Journal of Machine Learning Research 11:625-660.
  6. [Fender et al. 2008] Fender, A.; MacPherson, W. N.; Maier, R.; Barton, J. S.; George, D. S.; Howden, R. I.; Smith, G. W.; Jones, B.; McCulloch, S.; Chen, X.; et al. 2008. Twoaxis temperature-insensitive accelerometer based on multicore fiber Bragg gratings. IEEE sensors journal 7(8):12921298.
  7. [Hinton, Osindero, and Teh 2006] Hinton, G. E.; Osindero, S.; and Teh, Y.-W. 2006. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural computation 18(7):1527-1554.
  8. [Hinton 2012] Hinton, G. E. 2012. A practical guide to training restricted Boltzmann machines. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade . Springer. 599-619.
  9. [Khan et al. 2010] Khan, A. M.; Lee, Y.-K.; Lee, S. Y.; and Kim, T.-S. 2010. A triaxial accelerometer-based physicalactivity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14(5):1166-1172.
  10. [Lara and Labrador 2013] Lara, O. D., and Labrador, M. A. 2013. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 15(3):1192-1209.
  11. [Mohamed, Dahl, and Hinton 2012] Mohamed, A.-R.; Dahl, G. E.; and Hinton, G. 2012. Acoustic modeling using deep belief networks. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 20(1):14-22.
  12. [Parkka et al. 2006] Parkka, J.; Ermes, M.; Korpipaa, P.; Mantyjarvi, J.; Peltola, J.; and Korhonen, I. 2006. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 10(1):119-128.
  13. [Pl¨ otz, Hammerla, and Olivier 2011] Pl¨ otz, T.; Hammerla, N. Y.; and Olivier, P. 2011. Feature learning for activity recognition in ubiquitous computing. In IJCAI ProceedingsInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 22, 1729.
  14. [Rabiner and Juang 1986] Rabiner, L. R., and Juang, B.-H. 1986. An introduction to hidden markov models. IEEE ASSP Magazine 3(1):4-16.
  15. [Rumelhart, Hinton, and Williams 1986] Rumelhart, D. E.; Hinton, G. E.; and Williams, R. J. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088):533536.
  16. [Salakhutdinov 2015] Salakhutdinov, R. 2015. Learning deep generative models. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 2(1):361-385.
  17. [Xu et al. 2012] Xu, W.; Zhang, M.; Sawchuk, A. A.; and Sarrafzadeh, M. 2012. Robust human activity and sensor location corecognition via sparse signal representation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59(11):3169-3176.
  18. [Zappi et al. 2008] Zappi, P.; Lombriser, C.; Stiefmeier, T.; Farella, E.; Roggen, D.; Benini, L.; and Tr¨ oster, G. 2008. Activity recognition from on-body sensors: Accuracy-power trade-off by dynamic sensor selection. In Wireless sensor networks . Springer. 17-33.
  19. [Zheng, Zhang, and Song 2001] Zheng, F.; Zhang, G.; and Song, Z. 2001. Comparison of different implementations of MFCC. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 16(6):582-589.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsheikh, M. A., Selim, A., Niyato, D., Doyle, L., Lin, S., & Tan, H.-P.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1511.04664
arXiv
1511.04664
OpenAlex
W2962882167
Cited by
126
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
human activity recognition, triaxial accelerometer, wearable sensors, deep learning, unsupervised feature extraction, hidden Markov models, temporal modeling, mobile devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review