Cited by 216Muscle activation and electromyography studiesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Modulation of Muscle Force by Recruitment During Intramuscular Stimulation

Crago, Patrick E., Peckham, P. Hunter, Thrope, Geoffrey B.·1980·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The input-output relationships for modulation of force by recruitment during intramuscular electrical stimulation were examined for cat sleus muscles and human finger and thumb muscles. Recruitment was modulated by varying either the pulsewidth or amplitude of a monophasic, rectangular, cathodal current pulse train. Force was a nonlinear function of either pulsewidth or amplitude, and the shape of the nonlinearity was the same regardless of which parameter was modulated. The charge per stimulus pulse was lowest if pulsewidth was modulated with a fixed, high amplitude stimulus. The shape of the nonlinear relationship between pulsewidth and force (recruitment characteristic) depended on stimulus amplitude, electrode location in the muscle and muscle length. In most applications the amplitude and location would be fixed, so force would be a two-dimensional nonlinear function of pulsewidth and muscle length. The results are discussed with respect to possible mechanisns of recruitment during intramuscular stimulation, and the implications of the nonlinearities on the proportional control of orthoses employing electrically stimulated muscles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.1980.326592

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crago, P. E., Peckham, P. H., & Thrope, G. B.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1980-12
Volume
BME-27
Issue
12
Pages
679-684
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2000185603
Cited by
216
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
intramuscular electrical stimulation, motor unit recruitment, input-output relationship, pulse duration, stimulus amplitude, muscle length, electrode placement, electrically stimulated muscle
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electrophysiology, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Hand, Hindlimb, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Neural Conduction, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Spinal Cord Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review