The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Classification of Heartbeats Using ECG Morphology and Heartbeat Interval Features
Open accessAbstract
A method for the automatic processing of the electrocardiogram (ECG) for the classification of heartbeats is presented. The method allocates manually detected heartbeats to one of the five beat classes recommended by ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998 standard, i.e., normal beat, ventricular ectopic beat (VEB), supraventricular ectopic beat (SVEB), fusion of a normal and a VEB, or unknown beat type. Data was obtained from the 44 nonpacemaker recordings of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The data was split into two datasets with each dataset containing approximately 50,000 beats from 22 recordings. The first dataset was used to select a classifier configuration from candidate configurations. Twelve configurations processing feature sets derived from two ECG leads were compared. Feature sets were based on ECG morphology, heartbeat intervals, and RR-intervals. All configurations adopted a statistical classifier model utilizing supervised learning. The second dataset was used to provide an independent performance assessment of the selected configuration. This assessment resulted in a sensitivity of 75.9%, a positive predictivity of 38.5%, and a false positive rate of 4.7% for the SVEB class. For the VEB class, the sensitivity was 77.7%, the positive predictivity was 81.9%, and the false positive rate was 1.2%. These results are an improvement on previously reported results for automated heartbeat classification systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Cited by
Real-Time Patient-Specific ECG Classification by 1-D Convolutional Neural Networks
Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., & Gabbouj, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2468589 · Cited by 1,912
Arrhythmia detection using deep convolutional neural network with long duration ECG signals
Yıldırım, Ö., Pławiak, P., Tan, R.-S., & Acharya, U. R. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.009 · Cited by 851
Heartbeat Classification Using Morphological and Dynamic Features of ECG Signals
Ye, C., Kumar, B. V. K. V., & Coimbra, M. T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2213253 · Cited by 522
A Generic and Robust System for Automated Patient-Specific Classification of ECG Signals
Ince, T., Kiranyaz, S., & Gabbouj, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2013934 · Cited by 481
ECG Classification Using Wavelet Packet Entropy and Random Forests
Li, T., & Zhou, M. (2016) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e18080285 · Cited by 478
A deep learning approach for ECG-based heartbeat classification for arrhythmia detection
Sannino, G., & De Pietro, G. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.03.057 · Cited by 445
LSTM-Based ECG Classification for Continuous Monitoring on Personal Wearable Devices
Saadatnejad, S., Oveisi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2911367 · Cited by 406
Block-Based Neural Networks for Personalized ECG Signal Classification
Jiang, W., & Seong Kong, G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2007.900239 · Cited by 366
A novel application of deep learning for single-lead ECG classification
Mathews, S. M., Kambhamettu, C., & Barner, K. E. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.013 · Cited by 322
Convolutional Neural Networks for patient-specific ECG classification
Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., Hamila, R., & Gabbouj, M. (2015) · 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7318926 · Cited by 309
Automatic ECG Classification Using Continuous Wavelet Transform and Convolutional Neural Network
Wang, T., Lu, C., Sun, Y., Yang, M., Liu, C., & Ou, C. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010119 · Cited by 308
Multiscale Energy and Eigenspace Approach to Detection and Localization of Myocardial Infarction
Sharma, L. N., Tripathy, R. K., & Dandapat, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2405134 · Cited by 296
Novel methodology of cardiac health recognition based on ECG signals and evolutionary-neural system
Pławiak, P. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.022 · Cited by 264
Towards End-to-End ECG Classification With Raw Signal Extraction and Deep Neural Networks
Xu, S. S., Mak, M.-W., & Cheung, C.-C. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2871510 · Cited by 253
Prognosis—A Wearable Health-Monitoring System for People at Risk: Methodology and Modeling
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2010.2040085 · Cited by 136
Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2877055 · Cited by 102
Subject-Aware Contrastive Learning for Biosignals
Cheng, J. Y., Goh, H., Dogrusoz, K., Tuzel, O., & Azemi, E. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04871 · Cited by 74
Deep learning-based multidimensional feature fusion for classification of ECG arrhythmia
Cui, J., Wang, L., He, X., De Albuquerque, V. H. C., AlQahtani, S. A., & Hassan, M. M. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06487-5 · Cited by 43
Wang, T., Lu, C., Yang, M., Hong, F., & Liu, C. (2020) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.324 · Cited by 37
Lee, K. H., Kung, S.-Y., & Verma, N. (2012) · Journal of Signal Processing Systems · doi:10.1007/s11265-012-0672-8 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- deChazal, P., O'Dwyer, M., & Reilly, R. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1196-1206
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103308415
- Cited by
- 1,671
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
