Cited by 6Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Exploring the Knowledge of an Outstanding Protein to Protein Interaction Transformer

Open access
Yang, Sen, Cheng, Peng, Liu, Yang, Feng, Dawei, Wang, Shengqi·2024·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein-to-protein interaction (PPI) prediction aims to predict whether two given proteins interact or not. Compared with traditional experimental methods of high cost and low efficiency, the current deep learning based approach makes it possible to discover massive potential PPIs from large-scale databases. However, deep PPI prediction models perform poorly on unseen species, as their proteins are not in the training set. Targetting on this issue, the paper first proposes PPITrans, a Transformer based PPI prediction model that exploits a language model pre-trained on proteins to conduct binary PPI prediction. To validate the effectiveness on unseen species, PPITrans is trained with Human PPIs and tested on PPIs of other species. Experimental results show that PPITrans significantly outperforms the previous state-of-the-art on various metrics, especially on PPIs of unseen species. For example, the AUPR improves 0.339 absolutely on Fly PPIs. Aiming to explore the knowledge learned by PPITrans from PPI data, this paper also designs a series of probes belonging to three categories. Their results reveal several interesting findings, like that although PPITrans cannot capture the spatial structure of proteins, it can obtain knowledge of PPI type and binding affinity, learning more than binary PPI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2024.3381825

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S., Cheng, P., Liu, Y., Feng, D., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (CN)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Sen
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2024-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
1287-1298
ISSN
  • 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9964
  • 2374-0043
OpenAlex
W4393217153
Cited by
6
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62306334, 81830101)
  • Open Fund of PDL (WDZC20245250107)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction prediction, transformer models, protein language models, cross-species generalization, binding affinity, protein spatial structure
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Proteins, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review