The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain-Powered Parallel Healthcare Systems Based on the ACP Approach
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment, a framework of parallel healthcare systems (PHSs) based on the artificial systems + computational experiments + parallel execution (ACP) approach is proposed in this paper. PHS uses artificial healthcare systems to model and represent patients’ conditions, diagnosis, and treatment process, then applies computational experiments to analyze and evaluate various therapeutic regimens, and implements parallel execution for decision-making support and real-time optimization in both actual and artificial healthcare processes. In addition, we combine the emerging blockchain technology with PHS, via constructing a consortium blockchain linking patients, hospitals, health bureaus, and healthcare communities for comprehensive healthcare data sharing, medical records review, and care auditability. Finally, a prototype named parallel gout diagnosis and treatment system is built and deployed to verify and demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the blockchain-powered PHS framework.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Allowing cloud providers to control the keys could potentially increase the risks of data leakage because cloud administrators have the chance to ''touch'' the keys and further to decrypt data.”
From A review of secure and privacy-preserving medical data sharing (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) · doi:10.1109/bigdatacongress.2017.85 · Cited by 4,515
MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016) · 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) · doi:10.1109/obd.2016.11 · Cited by 2,526
(2017) · Cited by 1,724
MeDShare: Trust-Less Medical Data Sharing Among Cloud Service Providers via Blockchain
Xia, Q., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2730843 · Cited by 1,148
Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems
Yuan, Y., & Wang, F.-Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795984 · Cited by 671
Self-citationIntroduction to “This is Watson”
Ferrucci, D. A. (2012) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2012.2184356 · Cited by 519
Kuo, T.-T., & Lucila Ohno-machado, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.01746 · Cited by 201
Automatic knowledge extraction from documents
Fan, J., Kalyanpur, A. A., Gondek, D. C., & Ferrucci, D. A. (2012) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2012.2186519 · Cited by 135
ACP-based social computing and parallel intelligence: Societies 5.0 and beyond
Wang, X., Li, L., Yuan, Y., Ye, P., & Wang, F. (2016) · CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · doi:10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.005 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- xue, 2017, A medical data sharing model via blockchain, Acta Autom Sinica, 43, 1555
- yuan, 2016, Blockchain: The state of the art and future trends, Acta Autom Sinica, 42, 481
- yuan, 2017, Parallel blockchain: Concept, methods and connotation analysis, Acta Autom Sinica, 43, 1703
- wang, 2016, Parallel vision: An ACP-based approach to intelligent vision computing, Acta Autom Sinica, 42, 1490
- qi, 2017, The research advances of knowledge graph, Technol Intell Eng, 3, 4
- bai, 2017, Parallel robotics and parallel unmanned systems: Framework, structure, process, platform and applications, Acta Autom Sinica, 43, 161
- wang, 2017, Parallel surgery: An ACP-based approach for intelligent operations, Pattern Recognit Artif Intell, 30, 961
- li, 2017, Parallel learning—A new framework for machine learning, Acta Autom Sinica, 43, 1
- wang, 2004, Artificial societies, computational experiments, and parallel systems: A discussion on computational theory of complex social-economic systems, J Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 1, 25
- 2018, Healthcare’s New Smart Technology Model
- li, 2016, Practice of Gout
- wang, 2017, Parallel medicine, Proc 7th East Gout Forum Rep Asia–Pacific Gout Conf
- wang, 2017, Parallel gout: An ACP based system framework for gout diagnosis and treatment, Pattern Recognit Artif Intell, 30, 1057
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain for healthcare data management: opportunities, challenges, and future recommendations
Yaqoob, I., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., & Al-Hammadi, Y. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05519-w · Cited by 687
A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security
Berdik, D., Otoum, S., Schmidt, N., Porter, D., & Jararweh, Y. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102397 · Cited by 605
Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review and Directions for Future Research
Khezr, S., Moniruzzaman, M., Yassine, A., & Benlamri, R. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9091736 · Cited by 575
Applications of blockchain technology in medicine and healthcare: challenges and future perspectives
Siyal, A. A., Junejo, A. Z., Zawish, M., Ahmed, K., Khalil, A., & Soursou, G. (2019) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography3010003 · Cited by 531
Blockchain technology applications in healthcare: An overview
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Rab, S. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Networks · doi:10.1016/j.ijin.2021.09.005 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Qiu, T., Yuan, Y., Ouyang, L., Guo, Y., & Wang, F.-Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 942-950
- ISSN
- 2329-924X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7476
- OpenAlex
- W2889429201
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 46.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71472174, 61533019, 71232006, 61702519, 71702182)
- Qingdao Think-Tank Foundation on Intelligent Industries
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- blockchain, consortium blockchain, numerical experiments, parallel execution, decision support, real-time optimization, health data sharing, medical records, gout diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review