Cited by 29GaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesSemiconductor materials and devices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hot-Electron Trapping and Hole-Induced Detrapping in GaN-Based GITs and HD-GITs

Fabris, Elena, Meneghini, Matteo, De Santi, Carlo, Borga, Matteo, Kinoshita, Yusuke, Tanaka, Kenichiro, Ishida, Hidetoshi, Ueda, Tetsuzo, Meneghesso, Gaudenzio, Zanoni, Enrico·2019·IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices

Abstract

This paper investigates the trapping mechanisms in gate-injection transistors (GITs) without and with a pdrain electrode, referred to as GITs and Hybrid-Drain-embedded GITs (HD-GITs), respectively, used to inject holes and reduce charge trapping effects. We compare the two sets of devices under both the OFF-state and semi-ON state, to investigate the role of hot electrons in favoring the charge trapping. The analysis is based on combined pulsed characterization, transient measurements, and electroluminescence (EL) characterization. We demonstrate the following relevant results: 1) GITs and HD-GITs have comparable and negligible dynamic RONwhen trapping is induced in the OFF-state; under semi-ON state conditions, GITs suffer from significant dynamic RON, while HD-GITs show no additional trapping with respect to OFF-state; 2) EL characterization carried out until VDS= 500 V in semi-ON conditions shows comparable features, suggesting that the electric field and hot-carrier density are similar in GITs and HD-GITs. This result indicates that the hot-electron trapping rate is identical for the two sets of samples, so the difference observed in dynamic RONmust be ascribed to a different detrapping rate; 3) transient RONmeasurements indicate that the traps filled in the OFF-state conditions are the same as those filled by hot electrons in semi-ON, with Ea= 0.8 eV (possibly CN); and 4) EL analysis under constant bias indicates that in GITs there is a time-dependent increase in the luminescence signal at the drain terminal, when the devices are biased with VDS = 300 V. Such effect, indicative of hot-electron trapping, is not observed in HD-GITs. Based on the experimental evidence collected within this paper, we conclude that-in the semi-ON state-the main difference between GITs and HD-GITs consists in a faster detrapping rate of hot electrons, achieved through hole injection from the pdrain terminal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ted.2018.2877905

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fabris et al. carried out experiments showing ON-resistance behavior for different drain quiescent biases in OFF-state and semi-on state operation, exploring the effectiveness of the hybrid-drain approach.

    “The effectiveness of this approach has been explored by Fabris et al. [36], by carrying out a set of experiments that highlighted the ON-resistance behavior for different drain quiescent biases (QBs) in OFF-state and semi-on state operation.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1109/LED.2013.2297626 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/LED.2015.2442293 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0038-1101(65)90024-9 · DOI
  4. ostermeir, 1992, Hot carrier light emission from GaAs HEMT devices, Semicond Sci Technol, 7, 564b, 10.1088/0268-1242/7/3B/148 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/16.199363 · DOI
  6. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/43/435101 · DOI
  7. 10.1063/1.3479917 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241779 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/LED.2011.2181815 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/IRPS.2017.7936308 · DOI
  11. 10.1063/1.4934184 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TED.2011.2160547 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ISPSD.2015.7123384 · DOI
  14. sin, 2015, Novel GIT structure solves current collapse in GaN power HEMTs, Proc How2Power, 1
  15. 10.1109/ISPSD.2015.7123384 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TED.2017.2653847 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/ICSICT.2014.7021210 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.035204 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.1687983 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fabris, E., Meneghini, M., De Santi, C., Borga, M., Kinoshita, Y., Tanaka, K., Ishida, H., Ueda, T., Meneghesso, G., & Zanoni, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Panasonic (Japan) (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2019-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
337-342
ISSN
  • 0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9646
OpenAlex
W2900564950
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, “Direzione Generale per la Promozione del Sistema Paese,” through the Italy-Japan bilateral Project “MAGYGAN.”
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor materials and devices
Keywords
gate injection transistor, GaN, hot electron trapping, hole injection, charge trapping, detrapping, dynamic on-resistance, electroluminescence, high-voltage power devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review