Cited by 45Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingLow-power high-performance VLSI designAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noise-Resilient DNN: Tolerating Noise in PCM-Based AI Accelerators via Noise-Aware Training

Abstract

Phase change memory (PCM)-based “Analog-AI” accelerators are gaining importance for inference in edge applications due to the energy efficiency offered by in-memory computing. Nevertheless, noise sources inherent to PCM devices cause inaccuracies in the deep neural network (DNN) weight values. Such inaccuracies can lead to severe degradation in model accuracy. To address this, we propose two techniques to improve noise resiliency of DNNs: 1) drift regularization (DR) and 2) multiplicative noise training (MNT). We evaluate convolutional networks trained on image classification and recurrent neural networks trained on language modeling and show that our techniques improve model accuracy by up to 12% over one month.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ted.2021.3089987

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2871057 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/3316781.3317870 · DOI
  3. horowitz, 2014, 1.1 Computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it), IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf (ISSCC) Dig Tech Papers, 10
  4. 10.1109/TED.2006.888752 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3079856.3080246 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.23919/DATE.2019.8715178 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/HPCA.2017.29 · DOI
  8. zaremba, 2014, Recurrent neural network regularization, arXiv 1409 2329
  9. 10.1109/DRC.2016.7548449 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/216585.216588 · DOI
  11. 10.1147/JRD.2019.2934050 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/ISCAS.2019.8702756 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3007787.3001177 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/2541940.2541967 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993482 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/ISCA.2018.00012 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/MICRO.2016.7783725 · DOI · Paper page
  18. paszke, 2017, Automatic differentiation in PyTorch, Proc 31st Conf Neural Inf Process Syst, 51, 714
  19. 10.1145/3007787.3001139 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TED.2004.825805 · DOI
  21. 10.1088/1361-6463/aac8a5 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993641 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993431 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Kariyappa, S., Tsai, H., Spoon, K., Ambrogio, S., Narayanan, P., Mackin, C., Chen, A., Qureshi, M., & Burr, G. W.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2021-09
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
4356-4362
ISSN
  • 0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9646
OpenAlex
W3195461290
Cited by
45
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
phase-change memory, noise robustness, noise-aware training, in-memory computing, edge inference, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, device noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review