Cited by 90DNA and Biological ComputingAlgorithms and Data CompressionError Correcting Code Techniques

Coded Trace Reconstruction

Open access
Cheraghchi, Mahdi, Gabrys, Ryan, Milenkovic, Olgica, Ribeiro, Joao·2020·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

Motivated by average-case trace reconstruction and coding for portable DNA-based storage systems, we initiate the study of coded trace reconstruction, the design and analysis of high-rate efficiently encodable codes that can be efficiently decoded with high probability from few reads (also called traces) corrupted by edit errors. Codes used in current portable DNA-based storage systems with nanopore sequencers are largely based on heuristics, and have no provable robustness or performance guarantees even for an error model with i.i. d. deletions and constant deletion probability. Our work is a first step towards the design of efficient codes with provable guarantees for such systems. We consider a constant rate of i.i. d. deletions, and begin by analyzing marker-based code-constructions coupled with worst-case trace reconstruction algorithms. Then, we show how a more careful design of the code allows us to exploit ideas from average-case trace reconstruction to reduce the number of traces required with the same redundancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.2020.2996377

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works have explored efficient clustering methods tailored to DNA data storage and efficient encoding schemes that allow recovery of a sequence from multiple noisy reads.

    “Recent works have explored the development of efficient clustering methods tailored to DNA data storage, as well as efficient encoding schemes that allow the recovery of a sequence from multiple noisy reads.93−96”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheraghchi, M., Gabrys, R., Milenkovic, O., & Ribeiro, J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2020-10
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
6084-6103
ISSN
  • 0018-9448
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W2922965174
Cited by
90
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
39.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW) (publishedVersion)
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Molecular Informatics Program
  • NSF and Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) SemiSynBio Award
  • NSF (1618366)
  • Center for Science of Information
  • NSF Science and Technology Center (CCF-0939370)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
Keywords
trace reconstruction, DNA data storage, nanopore sequencing, deletion, error-correcting codes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review