The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“different lesion appearances and annotation targets have been reported across tumor benchmarks [3,8,23]”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tumor segmentation is less stable because lesions are not tied to a fixed anatomical shape or location and may be small, heterogeneous, or weakly contrasted [3,8,23].”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Among expert annotators there is often considerable variability206,207.”
From The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [207]
In the citing paper
“This year, BraTS 2018 training dataset included 285 cases (210 HGG and 75 LGG), each with four 3D MRI modalities (T1, T1c, T2 and FLAIR) rigidly aligned, resampled to 1x1x1 mm isotropic resolution and skull-stripped.”
From 3D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Autoencoder Regularization (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The testing dataset (191 cases) allowed only a single submission, and was used to calculate the final challenge ranking.”
From 3D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Autoencoder Regularization (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The validation dataset (66 cases) allowed multiple submissions and was designed for intermediate evaluations.”
From 3D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Autoencoder Regularization (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Further noting that the preliminary federation model was already within the intra- and inter-rater variability range for this use-case (20% and 28%, respectively)47, any further improvements for the full federation consensus model would be expected to be minimal35–38.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The complexity of boundary detection drops when moving from smaller to larger sub-compartments, i.e., from ET to TC, and then to WT35–38.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, varying characteristics of the mpMRI data due to scanner hardware and acquisition protocol differences33,34 were handled at each collaborating site via established harmonized preprocessing pipelines35–39.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, we used a single off-the-shelf neural network architecture for training, but it has been shown that model ensembles perform better for the task at hand35–38, and it remains to be explored how such a strategy could be explored in a federated study.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The BraTS challenge35–38, seeking methodological advancements in the domain of neuro-oncology, has been providing the community with (i) the largest publicly available and manually-curated mpMRI dataset of diffuse glioma patients (an example of which is illustrated in Fig. 1b), and (ii) a harmonized preprocessing pipeline51,70,71 to handle differences in inter-site acquisition protocols.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“This functionality follows the harmonized data preprocessing protocol defined by the BraTS challenge35–38, as described below. This would allow accounting for inter-site acquisition protocol variations, e.g., 3D vs. 2D axial plane acquisitions.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“which is typically done in academic research projects35–38”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Following the precise definition of our problem statement35–38, ensuring strict compliance with the preprocessing and annotation protocol for the generation of reference standards was vital for the model to learn correct information during training.”
From Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Eaton-Rosene et al. [75] proposed a generalizable technique for quantifying uncertainty with Bayesian Neural Networks for semantic segmentation on the BraTS 2017 dataset [76], including 285 subjects with high-or low-grade gliomas.”
From Explainable AI in medical imaging: An overview for clinical practitioners – Beyond saliency-based XAI approaches (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
In the citing paper
“For tumor segmentation in the BraTS dataset Menze et al. (2014) (120 training and 50 test MR scans), the authors report six and seven points increase in Dice over supervised model when 20 and 50 labeled MR images are used for training.”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Menze et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“The suggested method outperforms other modifications such as CRF post-processing as well as sophisticated test-time data augmentation, winning the first place in the 2018 BraTS challenge”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Menze et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“their 3D generalization on BraTS dataset Menze et al. (2014) (274 training and 110 testing) leads to marginal performance gains in Dice, i.e. 3.7% over Random Forests, 0.3% over an ensemble method, and merely 0.7% over their proposed architecture”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Menze et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“And on BraTS 2015 Menze et al. (2014), consisting of 220 multi-modal MR images of brain tumors, 3D RNN-CRF slightly improves the Dice for tumor segmentation from 73.5% ± 10.5% to 73.8% ± 10.5% based upon a split of 85%/15% (187 training and 33 testing).”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Menze et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BraTS) [104] is a benchmark dataset for brain tumor segmentation.”
From Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“It contains brain MRIs acquired by various scanners from around 19 independent institutions.”
From Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“The existing automatic and semi-automatic brain tumor segmentation methods can be broadly categorized as either generative model based or discriminative model based methods (Menze et al., 2015).”
From A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentation (2018) · cites this paper as Menze et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022627411411 · Cited by 34,565
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Self-citationThe Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B. W., & Kleihues, P. (2007) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 · Cited by 15,656
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013087.49260.fb · Cited by 14,097
SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods
Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., & Susstrunk, S. E. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.120 · Cited by 9,451
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 · Cited by 7,507
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction
Tustison, N. J., Avants, B., Cook, P. A., Zheng, Y., Egan, A., Yushkevich, P. A., & Gee, J. C. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2010.2046908 · Cited by 6,119
Self-citationA reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Song, G., Cook, P. A., Klein, A., & Gee, J. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 · Cited by 4,796
Self-citationAn experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision
Boykov, Y., & Kolmogorov, V. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.60 · Cited by 4,577
Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
Dempster, A. P. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · Cited by 4,543
Erratum to: The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system
Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B. W., & Kleihues, P. (2007) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-156115 · Cited by 4,435
On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures
Besag, J. E. (1986) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x · Cited by 4,204
Wen, P. Y., Macdonald, D. R., Reardon, D. A., Cloughesy, T. F., Sorensen, A. G., Galanis, E., DeGroot, J. F., Wick, W., Gilbert, M. R., Lassman, A. B., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.3541 · Cited by 3,890
Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images
Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A. W., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R., Kipman, A., & Blake, A. (2011) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995316 · Cited by 3,545
Self-citationAutomatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431
Self-citationSUSAN—a new approach to low level image processing
Smith, S. M., & Brady, J. M. (1997) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1007963824710 · Cited by 3,333
What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?
Kolmogorov, V., & Zabih, R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.1262177 · Cited by 3,127
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index1
Zou, K. H., Warfield, S. K., Bharatha, A., Tempany, C. M., Kaus, M. R., Haker, S. J., Wells, W. M., Jolesz, F. A., & Kikinis, R. (2004) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00671-8 · Cited by 1,860
Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials Using Three-Dimensional Textons
Leung, T., & Malik, J. (2001) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1011126920638 · Cited by 1,498 · cited 1×
“To characterize the tumor surface variation, we employ our novel texture features such as fractal PTPSA [107], and mBm [108] as well as classical textons [109] as the second set of features.”
MethodOhgaki, H., & Kleihues, P. (2005) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/64.6.479 · Cited by 1,395
Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets
Heimann, T., van Ginneken, B., Styner, M. A., Arzhaeva, Y., Aurich, V., Bauer, C., Beck, A., Becker, C., Beichel, R., Bekes, G., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2013851 · Cited by 1,135
A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
Self-citationNew variants of a method of MRI scale standardization
Nyúl, L. G., Udupa, J. K., & Zhang, X. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.836373 · Cited by 958
Criminisi, A. (2011) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601985415 · Cited by 723
Self-citationPatch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation
Coupé, P., Manjón, J. V., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J. C., Robles, M., & Collins, D. L. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.018 · Cited by 704
Self-citationThe optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations
Avants, B. B., Yushkevich, P., Pluta, J., Minkoff, D., Korczykowski, M., Detre, J., & Gee, J. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.062 · Cited by 640
Self-citationA brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection*1
Prastawa, M. W. (2004) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2004.06.007 · Cited by 637
Self-citationDecision Forests for Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis
Criminisi, A., & Shotton, J. (2013) · Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4929-3 · Cited by 610
Self-citationAutomated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain
Leemput, K. V., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., & Suetens, P. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.811268 · Cited by 581
An Open Source Multivariate Framework for n-Tissue Segmentation with Evaluation on Public Data
Avants, B., Tustison, N. J., Wu, J., Cook, P. A., & Gee, J. C. (2011) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9109-y · Cited by 559
Self-citationLaws, K. (1980) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.959169 · Cited by 547
The case for open computer programs
Ince, D. C., Hatton, L., & Graham-Cumming, J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10836 · Cited by 542
Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Cree, M. J., Mizutani, A., Quellec, G., Sánchez, C. I., Zhang, B., Hornero, R., Lamard, M., Muramatsu, C., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2033909 · Cited by 519
Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data
Artaechevarria, X., Munoz-Barrutia, A., & Ortíz-de-Solórzano, C. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2014372 · Cited by 510
An Augmented Lagrangian Method for Total Variation Video Restoration
Chan, S. H., Khoshabeh, R., Gibson, K. B., Gill, P. E., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2158229 · Cited by 492
Shin, H.-C., Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., Doran, S. J., & Leach, M. O. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.277 · Cited by 488
Self-citationAutomated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection
Leemput, K. V., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Colchester, A. C. F., & Suetens, P. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.938237 · Cited by 487
BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique
Eskildsen, S. F., Coupé, P., Fonov, V., Manjón, J. V., Leung, K. K., Guizard, N., Wassef, S. N., Østergaard, L. R., & Collins, D. L. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.012 · Cited by 486
Self-citationA review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images
Cabezas, M., Oliver, A., Lladó, X., Freixenet, J., & Cuadra, M. B. (2011) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.015 · Cited by 450
Efficient Multilevel Brain Tumor Segmentation With Integrated Bayesian Model Classification
Corso, J. J., Sharon, E., Dube, S., El-Saden, S. M., Sinha, U. S., & Yuille, A. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.912817 · Cited by 444
Self-citationAutomated Segmentation of MR Images of Brain Tumors
Kaus, M. R., Warfield, S. K., Nabavi, A., Black, P. M., Jolesz, F. A., & Kikinis, R. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe44586 · Cited by 424
Bauer, S., Nolte, L. P., & Reyes, M. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_44 · Cited by 381
Self-citationSchaap, M., Metz, C., van Walsum, T., van der Giessen, A. G., Weustink, A. C., Mollet, N. R., Bauer, C., Bogunović, H., Castro‐González, C., Deng, X. B., et al. (2009) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2009.06.003 · Cited by 373
EM procedures using mean field-like approximations for Markov model-based image segmentation
Celeux, G., Forbes, F., & Peyrard, N. (2002) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00027-4 · Cited by 327
Self-citationLesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering
Seghier, M. L., Ramlackhansingh, A. F., Crinion, J., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.028 · Cited by 319
Multifractal Texture Estimation for Detection and Segmentation of Brain Tumors
Islam, A., Reza, S. M. S., & Iftekharuddin, K. M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2271383 · Cited by 319
Self-citationThe Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration
Kistler, M., Bonaretti, S., Pfahrer, M., Niklaus, R., & Büchler, P. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2930 · Cited by 304
Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: A 3-T resource study
Landman, B. A., Huang, A. J., Gifford, A., Vikram, D. S., Lim, I. A. L., Farrell, J. A. D., Bogovic, J., Hua, J., Chen, M., Jarso, S., et al. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.047 · Cited by 302
Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images
Fletcher-Heath, L., Hall, L., Goldgof, D. B., & Murtagh, F. R. (2001) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(00)00073-7 · Cited by 294
Extraction of Airways From CT (EXACT'09)
Lo, P., van Ginneken, B., Reinhardt, J. M., Yavarna, T., de Jong, P. A., Irving, B., Fetita, C. I., Ortner, M., Pinho, R., Sijbers, J., et al. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2012.2209674 · Cited by 293
Tumor-Cut: Segmentation of Brain Tumors on Contrast Enhanced MR Images for Radiosurgery Applications
Hamamci, A., Kucuk, N., Karaman, K., Engin, K., & Unal, G. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2011.2181857 · Cited by 286
Self-citationA Supervised Patch-Based Approach for Human Brain Labeling
Rousseau, F., Habas, P. A., & Studholme, C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2011.2156806 · Cited by 280
Decision Forests for Tissue-Specific Segmentation of High-Grade Gliomas in Multi-channel MR
Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Konukoglu, E., Criminisi, A., Demiralp, C., Shotton, J., Thomas, O. M., Das, T., Jena, R., & Price, S. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_46 · Cited by 276
Self-citationTwenty New Digital Brain Phantoms for Creation of Validation Image Data Bases
Aubert-Broche, B., Griffin, M., Pike, G. B., Evans, A. C., & Collins, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.883453 · Cited by 265
Self-citationLevel-set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors
Ho, S., Bullitt, E., & Gerig, G. (2003) · doi:10.1109/icpr.2002.1044788 · Cited by 259
Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: Existing methods and their validation
Belaroussi, B., Milles, J., Carme, S., Zhu, Y., & Benoit-Cattin, H. (2005) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2005.09.004 · Cited by 257
Spatial decision forests for MS lesion segmentation in multi-channel magnetic resonance images
Geremia, E., Olivier Clatz, A., Menze, B. H., Ender Konukoglu, A., Criminisi, A., & Ayache, N. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.080 · Cited by 232
Self-citationEvent-related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: Theory and experiment
Bandettini, P. A., & Cox, R. W. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200004)43:4 · Cited by 230
GLISTR: Glioma Image Segmentation and Registration
Gooya, A., Pohl, K. M., Bilello, M., Cirillo, L., Biros, G., Melhem, E. R., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2012.2210558 · Cited by 217
A Generative Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multi-Modal Images
Menze, B. H., Leemput, K. V., Danial Lashkari, A., Weber, M. D., Ayache, N., & Golland, P. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15745-5_19 · Cited by 212
Self-citation3D Segmentation in the Clinic: A Grand Challenge
van Ginneken, B., Heimann, T., & Styner, M. A. (2007) · Cited by 212
Atlas-Based Segmentation of Pathological MR Brain Images Using a Model of Lesion Growth
BachCuadra, M., Pollo, C., Bardera, A., Cuisenaire, O., Villemure, J., & Thiran, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.834618 · Cited by 209
Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors1
Prastawa, M. W., Bullitt, E., Moon, N., Leemput, K. V., & Gerig, G. (2003) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00506-3 · Cited by 209
Self-citationCriminisi, A., Ender Konukoglu, A., & Shotton, J. (2011) · Cited by 204
Self-citationTong, T., Wolz, R., Coupé, P., Hajnal, J. V., & Rueckert, D. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.069 · Cited by 198
Progenitor cells and glioma formation
Holland, E. C. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/00019052-200112000-00002 · Cited by 184
Nikos Komodakis, A., Tziritas, G., & Nikos Paragios, A. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2008.06.007 · Cited by 181
3D Segmentation in the Clinic: A Grand Challenge II: MS lesion segmentation
Styner, M. A., Lee, J., Chin, B., Chin, M., Commowick, O., Tran, H.-H., Markovic‐Plese, S., Jewells, V. L., & Warfield, S. K. (2008) · doi:10.54294/lmkqvm · Cited by 180
Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods
Shattuck, D. W., Prasad, G., Mirza, M., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.066 · Cited by 167
Simulation of brain tumors in MR images for evaluation of segmentation efficacy
Prastawa, M. W., Bullitt, E., & Gerig, G. (2008) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2008.11.002 · Cited by 151
Self-citationWu, W. Y., Chen, A. Y. C., Zhao, L., & Corso, J. J. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0922-7 · Cited by 146
Self-citationIs Synthesizing MRI Contrast Useful for Inter-modality Analysis?
Iglesias, J. E., Konukoğlu, E., Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Leemput, K. V., & Fischl, B. R. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_79 · Cited by 142
Self-citationVerma, R., Zacharaki, E. I., Ou, Y., Cai, H., Chawla, S., Lee, S., Melhem, E. R., Wolf, R. L., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2008) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.029 · Cited by 137
Multi-Modal Glioblastoma Segmentation: Man versus Machine
Porz, N., Bauer, S., Pica, A., Schucht, P., Beck, J., Verma, R. K., Slotboom, J., Reyes, M., & Wiest, R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096873 · Cited by 135
Self-citationAngelini, E. D., Clatz, O., Mandonnet, E., Konukoğlu, E., Capelle, L., & Duffau, H. (2007) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340507782446241 · Cited by 125
Ahmed, S., Iftekharuddin, K. M., & Vossough, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2011.2104376 · Cited by 112
Self-citationORBIT: A Multiresolution Framework for Deformable Registration of Brain Tumor Images
Zacharaki, E. I., Shen, D. G., Lee, S., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.916954 · Cited by 108
3D Variational Brain Tumor Segmentation using a High Dimensional Feature Set
Cobzaş, D., Birkbeck, N., Schmidt, M., Jägersand, M., & Murtha, A. D. (2007) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4409130 · Cited by 107
Deformable registration of brain tumor images via a statistical model of tumor-induced deformation
Mohamed, A., Zacharaki, E. I., Shen, D. G., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2006) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2006.06.005 · Cited by 104
On evaluating brain tissue classifiers without a ground truth
Sylvain Bouix, A., Martín‐Fernández, M., Ungar, L., Nakamura, M., Koo, M., McCarley, R. W., & Shenton, M. E. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.031 · Cited by 101
N4ITK: Nick's N3 ITK Implementation For MRI Bias Field Correction
Tustison, N. J., & Gee, J. C. (2010) · The Insight Journal · doi:10.54294/jculxw · Cited by 101
Self-citationSpatial Decision Forests for MS Lesion Segmentation in Multi-Channel MR Images
Geremia, E., Menze, B. H., Olivier Clatz, A., Ender Konukoglu, A., Criminisi, A., & Ayache, N. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_14 · Cited by 99
Self-citationRecognizing Deviations from Normalcy for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Gering, D. T., Grimson, W. E. L., & Kikinis, R. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45786-0_48 · Cited by 98
Deformable Registration of Glioma Images Using EM Algorithm and Diffusion Reaction Modeling
Gooya, A., Biros, G., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2010.2078833 · Cited by 94
Segmenting Brain Tumors Using Pseudo–Conditional Random Fields
Lee, C., Wang, S., Murtha, A. D., Brown, M., & Greiner, R. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_43 · Cited by 91
Segmentation of Meningiomas and Low Grade Gliomas in MRI
Kaus, M. R., Warfield, S. K., Nabavi, A., et al. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/10704282_1 · Cited by 87
A Unifying Approach to Registration, Segmentation, and Intensity Correction
Pohl, K. M., Fisher, J. W., Levitt, J. J., et al. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11566465_39 · Cited by 83
Wels, M., Carneiro, G., Aplas, A., Huber, M., Joachim Hornegger, A., & Comaniciu, D. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_9 · Cited by 80
A Compressed Sensing Approach for MR Tissue Contrast Synthesis
Roy, S., Carass, A., & Prince, J. L. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_31 · Cited by 80
Evaluation framework for carotid bifurcation lumen segmentation and stenosis grading
Hameeteman, K., Zuluaga, M. A., Freiman, M., Leo Joskowicz, B., Cuisenaire, O., Flórez-Valencia, L., Gulsun, M. A., Krissian, K., Mille, J., Wong, W. C. K., et al. (2011) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.02.004 · Cited by 80
Model-based brain and tumor segmentation
Moon, N., Bullitt, E., Leemput, K. V., & Gerig, G. (2003) · doi:10.1109/icpr.2002.1044787 · Cited by 79
Automatic segmentation, internal classification, and follow-up of optic pathway gliomas in MRI
Weizman, L., Ben‐Sira, L., Joskowicz, L., et al. (2011) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.07.001 · Cited by 71
Segmentation of image ensembles via latent atlases
Raviv, T. R., Leemput, K. V., Menze, B. H., Wells, W. M., & Golland, P. (2010) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2010.05.004 · Cited by 65
Self-citationJoint Tumor Segmentation and Dense Deformable Registration of Brain MR Images
Parisot, S., Duffau, H., Chemouny, S., & Nikos Paragios, A. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_80 · Cited by 61
Dense deformation field estimation for atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images
Cuadra, M. B., Craene, M. D., Duay, V., Macq, B. M. M., Pollo, C., & Thiran, J. (2006) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.08.003 · Cited by 61
A Skull-Stripping Filter for ITK
Bauer, S., Fejes, T., & Reyes, M. (2013) · The Insight Journal · doi:10.54294/dp4mfp · Cited by 59
Self-citationHierarchical Probabilistic Gabor and MRF Segmentation of Brain Tumours in MRI Volumes
Subbanna, N. K., Precup, D., Collins, D. L., & Arbel, T. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_94 · Cited by 57
Self-citationContext-sensitive Classication Forests for Segmentation of Brain Tumor Tissues
Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Ender Konukoglu, A., Shotton, J., Criminisi, A., Ye, D., Demiralp, Ç., Thomas, O., Das, T., Jena, R., et al. (2012) · Cited by 53
Self-citationSpatially Adaptive Random Forests
Geremia, E., Menze, B. H., & Ayache, N. (2013) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2013.6556781 · Cited by 50
Self-citationMulti-atlas Segmentation without Registration: A Supervoxel-Based Approach
Wang, H., & Yushkevich, P. A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40760-4_67 · Cited by 42
Tustison, N. J., Johnson, H. J., Rohlfing, T., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00162 · Cited by 42
Self-citationInteractive, GPU-Based Level Sets for 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation
Lefohn, A., Cates, J. E., & Whitaker, R. (2003) · Cited by 39
3D Segmentation in the Clinic: A Grand Challenge II - Coronary Artery Tracking
Metz, C., Schaap, M., van Walsum, T., et al. (2008) · doi:10.54294/65tyev · Cited by 39
Optimal Weights for Multi-atlas Label Fusion
Wang, H., Suh, J. W., Pluta, J. B., Altinay, M. I., & Yushkevich, P. A. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_7 · Cited by 38
A Validation Framework for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Archip, N., Jolesz, F. A., & Warfield, S. K. (2007) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.025 · Cited by 37
A Skull-Stripping Filter for ITK
Bauer, S., Fejes, T., & Reyes, M. (2013) · doi:10.7892/boris.39690 · Cited by 33
Self-citationShin, H.-C., Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., et al. (2011) · doi:10.1109/icmla.2011.38 · Cited by 32
Self-citationMonitoring slowly evolving tumors
Konukoğlu, E., Wells, W. M., Novellas, S., et al. (2008) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2008.4541120 · Cited by 26
Hybrid Clustering and Logistic Regression for Multi-Modal Brain Tumor Segmentation
Shin, H.-C. (2012) · Cited by 26
Self-citationGörlitz, L., Menze, B. H., Weber, M. D., et al. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_23 · Cited by 25
Self-citationKaster, F. O., Menze, B. H., Weber, M., & Hamprecht, F. A. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18421-5_8 · Cited by 23
Self-citationProbabilistic Gabor and Markov Random Fields Segmentation of B rain Tumours in MRI Volumes
Subbanna, N. K., & Arbel, T. (2012) · Cited by 22
Self-citationAutomatic MRI Meningioma Segmentation Using Estimation Maximization
Tsai, Y.-F., Chiang, I.-J., Lee, Y.-C., et al. (2005) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2005.1617124 · Cited by 20
Increased discrimination in level set methods with embedded conditional random fields
Cobzaş, D., & Schmidt, M. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206812 · Cited by 20
Olivier Clatz, A., Bondiau, P., Delingette, H., et al. (2004) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 19
Self-citationIntegrated Spatio-Temporal Segmentation of Longitudinal Brain Tumor Imaging Studies
Bauer, S., Tessier, J. J. L., Krieter, O., et al. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05530-5_8 · Cited by 19
Self-citationCloud–Based Evaluation Framework for Big Data
Hanbury, A., Müller, H., Langs, G., & Menze, B. H. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38082-2_9 · Cited by 13
Self-citationSpatio-Temporal Video Segmentation With Shape Growth or Shrinkage Constraint
Tarabalka, Y., Charpiat, G., Brucker, L., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2336544 · Cited by 12
Joint segmentation via patient-specific latent anatomy model
Raviv, T. R., Menze, B. H., Leemput, K. V., et al. (2009) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 10
Self-citationLongitudinal intensity normalization in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions
Roy, S., Carass, A., Shiee, N., et al. (2013) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2013.6556791 · Cited by 10
Existence Conditions for Discrete Noncanonical Multiwindow Gabor Schemes
Subbanna, N. K., & Zeevi, Y. Y. J. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2007.896100 · Cited by 9
Self-citationEnforcing Monotonous Shape Growth or Shrinkage in Video Segmentation
Tarabalka, Y., Charpiat, G., Brucker, L., et al. (2013) · British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) · doi:10.5244/c.27.27 · Cited by 4
Minimizing Joint Risk of Mislabeling for Iterative Patch-Based Label Fusion
Wu, G., Wang, Q., Liao, S., et al. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40760-4_69 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1007/s00401-007-0278-6 · DOI
- Menze, Segmenting glioma in multi-modal images using a generative model for brain lesion segmentation, 1
- Ibanez, 2003, The ITK Software Guide
- Cocosco, 1997, Brainweb: Online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database, NeuroImage, 301
- Bauer, Segmentation of brain tumor images based on integrated hierarchical classification and regularization, 32
- 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_46 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2984875 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_44 · DOI
- 10.29172/7c2a6982-6d72-4cd8-bba6-2fccb06a7011 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.969114 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759
Self-citationEfficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498
“Table 2: Average performance of our system on the training data of BRATS 2015 as computed on the online evaluation platform and comparison to other submissions visible at the time of manuscript submission.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBrain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 4,015
Metadata
- Authors
- Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., Lanczi, L., Gerstner, E., Weber, M.-A., Arbel, T., Avants, B. B., Ayache, N., Buendia, P., Collins, D. L., Cordier, N., Corso, J. J., Criminisi, A., Das, T., Delingette, H., Demiralp, C., Durst, C. R., Dojat, M., Doyle, S., Festa, J., Forbes, F., Geremia, E., Glocker, B., Golland, P., Guo, X., Hamamci, A., Iftekharuddin, K. M., Jena, R., John, N. M., Konukoglu, E., Lashkari, D., Mariz, J. A., Meier, R., Pereira, S., Precup, D., Price, S. J., Raviv, T. R., Reza, S. M. S., Ryan, M., Sarikaya, D., Schwartz, L., Shin, H.-C., Shotton, J., Silva, C. A., Sousa, N., Subbanna, N. K., Szekely, G., Taylor, T. J., Thomas, O. M., Tustison, N. J., Unal, G., Vasseur, F., Wintermark, M., Ye, D. H., Zhao, L., Zhao, B., Zikic, D., Prastawa, M., Reyes, M., & Van Leemput, K.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
- University of Bern (CH)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- Harvard University (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Infotech Soft (United States) (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Minho (PT)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Old Dominion University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- GE Global Research (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Menze, Bjoern H.
- ORCID
- Menze, Bjoern H.
- Farahani, Keyvan
- Kirby, Justin
- Porz, Nicole
- Slotboom, Johannes
- Wiest, Roland
- Gerstner, Elizabeth
- Arbel, Tal
- Avants, Brian B.
- Ayache, Nicholas
- Buendia, Patricia
- Collins, D. Louis
- Cordier, Nicolas
- Corso, Jason J.
- Criminisi, Antonio
- Das, Tilak
- Durst, Christopher R.
- Dojat, Michel
- Doyle, Senan
- Festa, Joana
- Forbes, Florence
- Glocker, Ben
- Golland, Polina
- Meier, Raphael
- Precup, Doina
- Price, Stephen J.
- Raviv, Tammy Riklin
- Ryan, Michael
- Silva, Carlos A.
- Sousa, Nuno
- Thomas, Owen M.
- Tustison, Nicholas J.
- Wintermark, Max
- Ye, Dong Hye
- Zhao, Liang
- Zhao, Binsheng
- Prastawa, Marcel
- Reyes, Mauricio
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1993-2024
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- PMC
- PMC4833122
- OpenAlex
- W1641498739
- Cited by
- 6,781
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 863 · 2025: 937 · 2024: 899 · 2023: 845 · 2022: 791 · 2021: 709 · 2020: 612 · 2019: 468 · 2018: 310 · 2017: 161 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 49
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR/CS/009/011)
- European Commission (600841)
- Academy of Finland
- Tekes
- Lundbeckfonden (R141-2013-13117)
- Krebsliga Schweiz
- Technische Universität München
- National Institutes of Health
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA154601, R15CA115464)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB015902, U54EB005149, R01EB013565)
- National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075, P41RR013218, P41 RR13218)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- brain tumor segmentation, glioma, multimodal MRI, benchmark, interobserver variability, algorithm fusion, majority voting, manual annotation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Glioma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Benchmarking, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
