The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context-Aware Convolutional Neural Network for Grading of Colorectal Cancer Histology Images
Open accessAbstract
Digital histology images are amenable to the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for analysis due to the sheer size of pixel data present in them. CNNs are generally used for representation learning from small image patches (e.g. 224×224 ) extracted from digital histology images due to computational and memory constraints. However, this approach does not incorporate high-resolution contextual information in histology images. We propose a novel way to incorporate a larger context by a context-aware neural network based on images with a dimension of 1792×1792 pixels. The proposed framework first encodes the local representation of a histology image into high dimensional features then aggregates the features by considering their spatial organization to make a final prediction. We evaluated the proposed method on two colorectal cancer datasets for the task of cancer grading. Our method outperformed the traditional patch-based approaches, problem-specific methods, and existing context-based methods. We also presented a comprehensive analysis of different variants of the proposed method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Histopathologic classification studies have been reported in colorectal cancer (70,71).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications
Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.04861 · Cited by 19,015
A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
Ehteshami Bejnordi, B., Veta, M., Johannes van Diest, P., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., and the CAMELYON16 Consortium, Hermsen, M., Manson, Q. F., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14585 · Cited by 3,293
Self-citationSirinukunwattana, K., Raza, S. E. A., Tsang, Y.-W., Snead, D. R. J., Cree, I. A., & Rajpoot, N. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2525803 · Cited by 1,224
Self-citationTaskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learning
Zamir, A. R., Sax, A., Shen, W., Guibas, L., Malik, J., & Savarese, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00391 · Cited by 1,128
Classification of breast cancer histology images using Convolutional Neural Networks
Araújo, T., Aresta, G., Castro, E., Rouco, J., Aguiar, P., Eloy, C., Polónia, A., & Campilho, A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177544 · Cited by 1,044
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- stewart, 2014, World cancer report 2014, 3, 392
- 10.24963/ijcai.2019/871 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in histopathology: enhancing cancer research and clinical oncology
Shmatko, A., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Gerstung, M., & Kather, J. N. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00436-4 · Cited by 446
Graph Neural Networks and Their Current Applications in Bioinformatics
Zhang, X., Li, L., Liu, L., & Tang, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.690049 · Cited by 413
Artificial intelligence for digital and computational pathology
Song, A. H., Jaume, G., Williamson, D. F. K., Lu, M. Y., Vaidya, A., Miller, T. R., & Mahmood, F. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00096-8 · Cited by 356
Bilal, M., Raza, S. E. A., Azam, A., Graham, S., Ilyas, M., Cree, I. A., Snead, D., Minhas, F., & Rajpoot, N. M. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00180-1 · Cited by 299
Self-citationA comprehensive review of deep learning in colon cancer
Paçal, İ., Karaboğa, D., Baştürk, A., Akay, B., & Nalbantoglu, U. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104003 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaban, M., Awan, R., Fraz, M. M., Azam, A., Tsang, Y.-W., Snead, D., & Rajpoot, N. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University Hospital Coventry (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2395-2405
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2964056701
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1829583)
- The Alan Turing Institute through the EPSRC (EP/510129/1)
- Medical Research Council (MRC) award for the MICAHIL project (MR/P015476/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer, cancer grading, feature aggregation, spatial context, whole slide image classification
- MeSH terms
- Histological Techniques, Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
