Cited by 360Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

PPSF: a privacy-preserving and secure framework using blockchain-based machine-learning for IoT-driven smart cities

Kumar, Prabhat, Kumar, Randhir, Srivastava, Gautam, Gupta, Govind P., Tripathi, Rakesh, Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy, Xiong, Neal N.·2021·IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Abstract

With the evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT), smart cities have become the mainstream of urbanization. IoT networks allow distributed smart devices to collect and process data within smart city infrastructure using an open channel, the Internet. Thus, challenges such as centralization, security, privacy (e.g., performing data poisoning and inference attacks), transparency, scalability, and verifiability limits faster adaptations of smart cities. Motivated by the aforementioned discussions, we present a Privacy-Preserving and Secure Framework (PPSF) for IoT-driven smart cities. The proposed PPSF is based on two key mechanisms: a two-level privacy scheme and an intrusion detection scheme. First, in a two-level privacy scheme, a blockchain module is designed to securely transmit the IoT data and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique is applied to transform raw IoT information into a new shape. In the intrusion detection scheme, a Gradient Boosting Anomaly Detector (GBAD) is applied for training and evaluating the proposed two-level privacy scheme based on two IoT network datasets, namely ToN-IoT and BoT-IoT. We also suggest a blockchain-InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) integrated Fog-Cloud architecture to deploy the proposed PPSF framework. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the PPSF framework over some recent approaches in blockchain and non-blockchain systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnse.2021.3089435

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The blockchain employs cryptographic hashing algorithms and distributed consensus protocols to facilitate secure data transfer.

    “The blockchain employs cryptographic hashing algorithms and distributed consensus protocols to facilitate secure data transfer [111].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, P., Kumar, R., Srivastava, G., Gupta, G. P., Tripathi, R., Gadekallu, T. R., & Xiong, N. N.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Raipur (IN)
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
2326-2341
ISSN
  • 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-329X
OpenAlex
W3171918319
Cited by
360
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 13
FWCI
62.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-05363)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
privacy-preserving machine learning, blockchain, Internet of Things, smart cities, intrusion detection, anomaly detection, gradient boosting, principal component analysis, IPFS, fog-cloud architecture, data poisoning, inference attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review