The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Despite not recording directly from neural cells, the surface electromyogram (EMG) signal contains information on the neural drive to muscles, i.e., the spike trains of motor neurons. Using this property, myoelectric control consists of the recording of EMG signals for extracting control signals to command external devices, such as hand prostheses. In commercial control systems, the intensity of muscle activity is extracted from the EMG and used for single degrees of freedom activation (direct control). Over the past 60 years, academic research has progressed to more sophisticated approaches but, surprisingly, none of these academic achievements has been implemented in commercial systems so far. We provide an overview of both commercial and academic myoelectric control systems and we analyze their performance with respect to the characteristics of the ideal myocontroller. Classic and relatively novel academic methods are described, including techniques for simultaneous and proportional control of multiple degrees of freedom and the use of individual motor neuron spike trains for direct control. The conclusion is that the gap between industry and academia is due to the relatively small functional improvement in daily situations that academic systems offer, despite the promising laboratory results, at the expense of a substantial reduction in robustness. None of the systems so far proposed in the literature fulfills all the important criteria needed for widespread acceptance by the patients, i.e. intuitive, closed-loop, adaptive, and robust real-time ( 200 ms delay) control, minimal number of recording electrodes with low sensitivity to repositioning, minimal training, limited complexity and low consumption. Nonetheless, in recent years, important efforts have been invested in matching these criteria, with relevant steps forwards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future
Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004 · Cited by 1,875
A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.813539 · Cited by 1,743
The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG
Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003 · Cited by 1,573
Self-citationMyoelectric control systems—A survey
Asghari Oskoei, M., & Hu, H. (2007) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009 · Cited by 1,244
Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years
Biddiss, E. A., & Chau, T. T. (2007) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640600994581 · Cited by 1,111
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms
Kuiken, T. A. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.116 · Cited by 1,089
Scheme, E., & Englehart, K. (2011) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.09.0177 · Cited by 969
Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P. (2005) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x · Cited by 845
Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine
Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2012) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Atzori, M., Cognolato, M., & Müller, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009 · Cited by 684
“Proportional and simultaneous control of a large number of degrees of freedom of the prosthesis can allow achieving more natural and dexterous control using unsupervised or supervised methods (Fougner et al., 2012; Farina et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodA soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback
Gu, G., Zhang, N., Xu, H., Lin, S., Yu, Y., Chai, G., Ge, L., Yang, H., Shao, Q., Sheng, X., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00767-0 · Cited by 431
Bi, L., Feleke, A. >., & Guan, C. (2019) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.011 · Cited by 418
Surface EMG-Based Inter-Session Gesture Recognition Enhanced by Deep Domain Adaptation
Du, Y., Jin, W., Wei, W., Hu, Y., & Geng, W. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17030458 · Cited by 363
A Wearable Hand Rehabilitation System With Soft Gloves
Chen, X., Gong, L., Wei, L., Yeh, S.-C., Da Xu, L., Zheng, L., & Zou, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3010369 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Farina, D., Jiang, N., Rehbaum, H., Holobar, A., Graimann, B., Dietl, H., & Aszmann, O. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 797-809
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2066327120
- Cited by
- 992
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 30.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2014.2305111
- The paper
- Farina, D., Jiang, N., Rehbaum, H., Holobar, A., Graimann, B., Dietl, H., & Aszmann, O. C. (2014). The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2014.2305111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.