The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Computational biology and bioinformatics provide vast data gold-mines from protein sequences, ideal for Language Models (LMs) taken from Natural Language Processing (NLP). These LMs reach for new prediction frontiers at low inference costs. Here, we trained two auto-regressive models (Transformer-XL, XLNet) and four auto-encoder models (BERT, Albert, Electra, T5) on data from UniRef and BFD containing up to 393 billion amino acids. The protein LMs (pLMs) were trained on the Summit supercomputer using 5616 GPUs and TPU Pod up-to 1024 cores. Dimensionality reduction revealed that the raw pLM-embeddings from unlabeled data captured some biophysical features of protein sequences. We validated the advantage of using the embeddings as exclusive input for several subsequent tasks: (1) a per-residue (per-token) prediction of protein secondary structure (3-state accuracy Q3=81%-87%); (2) per-protein (pooling) predictions of protein sub-cellular location (ten-state accuracy: Q10=81%) and membrane versus water-soluble (2-state accuracy Q2=91%). For secondary structure, the most informative embeddings (ProtT5) for the first time outperformed the state-of-the-art without multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) or evolutionary information thereby bypassing expensive database searches. Taken together, the results implied that pLMs learned some of the grammar of the language of life. All our models are available through https://github.com/agemagician/ProtTrans.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fine-tuning has not been extensively explored in previous work5, possibly due to its demanding computational requirements.”
From Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“We also noted that the highest model performance is never achieved by using embeddings from the final layer, as shown in earlier work5.”
From Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Such models were then applied to protein sequence: the BERT architecture was directly trained on the Uniref100 and BFD-100 datasets to create the ProtBERT model [58] for protein sequence prediction.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- john, 2020, High accuracy protein structure prediction using deep learning, Fourteenth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (Abstract Book)
- limited, 2019, Press release announcing Supercomputer Fugaku
- rao, 2021, MSA transformer, bioRxiv 2021 02 12 430858
- armenteros, 2020, Language modelling for biological sequences–curated datasets and baselines, bioRxiv 2020 03 09 983585
- 10.1110/ps.03128904 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,007
Patoliya, J., Thaker, K., Rabadiya, K., Patel, D., Jain, N. K., & Joshi, R. G. (2023) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-023-00690-6 · Cited by 16
Mardikoraem, M., & Woldring, D. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15051337 · Cited by 16
“This has been tested with different NLP techniques, varying model parameters, and clustering sizes for databases used and resulted in a wide array of language-based protein representations [30,66,68,69].”
MethodAttSec: protein secondary structure prediction by capturing local patterns from attention map
(2023) · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05310-3 · Cited by 16
“Table 6 compares our model with the two best-performing single sequence-based models, ProtT5-XL-U50 and NetsurfP-3.”
MethodInfluentialPerez, R. M., Li, X., Giannakoulias, S. G., & Petersson, E. J. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00817 · Cited by 16
Generative artificial intelligence performs rudimentary structural biology modeling
Ille, A. M., Markosian, C., Burley, S. K., Mathews, M. B., Pasqualini, R., & Arap, W. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-69021-2 · Cited by 16
Boshar, S., Trop, E., de Almeida, B. P., Copoiu, L., & Pierrot, T. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae529 · Cited by 16
Li, M., Shi, Y., Hu, S., Hu, S., Guo, P., Wan, W., Zhang, L. Y., Pan, S., Li, J., Sun, L., et al. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae579 · Cited by 16
Protein engineering in the deep learning era
Zhou, B., Tan, Y., Hu, Y., Zheng, L., Zhong, B., & Hong, L. (2024) · mLife · doi:10.1002/mlf2.12157 · Cited by 18
Accelerating protein engineering with fitness landscape modelling and reinforcement learning
Sun, H., He, L., Deng, P., Liu, G., Zhao, Z., Jiang, Y., Cao, C., Ju, F., Wu, L., Liu, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01103-w · Cited by 19
“…TEM-1 [33]) and reporter proteins (GFP [34]) of high interest in synthetic biology, disease-related proteins (Amyloid beta precursor protein APP [35]), signaling proteins (PSD-95 [36], GRB2 [36] and YAP1 [37]), RNA binding proteins (Pab1 [38]), and protein binding proteins (GB1 [39]).”
Chen, T., Dumas, M., Watson, R., Vincoff, S., Peng, C., Zhao, L., Hong, L., Pertsemlidis, S., Shaepers-Cheu, M., Wang, T. Z., et al. (2023) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03842 · Cited by 24
ProteinCLIP: enhancing protein language models with natural languagePreprint
Wu, K., Chang, H. Y., & Zou, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.14.594226 · Cited by 19
Ota, M., Spence, J. P., Zeng, T., Dann, E., Marson, A., & Pritchard, J. K. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.22.634424 · Cited by 16
ProtSpace: A Tool for Visualizing Protein Space
Senoner, T., Olenyi, T., Heinzinger, M., Spannagl, A., Bouras, G. S., Rost, B., & Koludarov, I. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168940 · Cited by 17
Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences
Basu, S., Jing, Y., Kihara, D., & Kurgan, L. (2024) · Briefings Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf016 · Cited by 15
FusOn-pLM: a fusion oncoprotein-specific language model via adjusted rate masking
Vincoff, S., Goel, S., Kholina, K., Pulugurta, R., Vure, P., & Chatterjee, P. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56745-6 · Cited by 20
Gurusinghe, S. N. S., Wu, Y., DeGrado, W. F., & Shifman, J. M. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf270 · Cited by 15
Hypergraph-based semantic and topological self-supervised learning for brain disease diagnosis
Han, X., Lei, M., & Li, J. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111921 · Cited by 17
Phytopathogen Effector Biology in the Burgeoning AI Era
Jones, D., & Raffaele, S. (2025) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-121823-081033 · Cited by 17
He, Y., Song, X., Wan, H., & Zhao, X. (2025) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02253-4 · Cited by 17
Computational methods and data resources for predicting tumor neoantigens
Zhao, X., Wei, L., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf302 · Cited by 16
Recent Advances in Machine Learning‐Assisted Design and Development of Polymer Materials
Ma, L., Li, W., Yuan, J., Zhu, J., Wu, Y., He, H., & Pan, X. (2025) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.202500361 · Cited by 17
Talo, M., & Bozdag, S. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf183 · Cited by 16
Artificial intelligence-based methods for protein structure prediction: a survey
Zhan, Z., Hong, J., Li, J.-Y., Wang, C., He, L., Xu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11325-4 · Cited by 17
Mehdiabadi, M., Conte, A. D., Nugnes, M. V., Aspromonte, M. C., Tosatto, S. C. E., & Piovesan, D. (2025) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70045 · Cited by 20
Uyar, B., Savchyn, T., Nilchi, A. N., Sarıgün, A., Wurmus, R., Shaik, M. M., Grüning, B. A., Franke, V., & Akalin, A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63688-5 · Cited by 20
Artificial intelligence for nanomedicine
Song, X., Gao, X., Wang, H., Yu, F., Qin, M., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Feng, W., Zhou, C., Chukavin, N. N., et al. (2025) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-025-2942-5 · Cited by 16
GlobDB: a comprehensive species-dereplicated microbial genome resource
Speth, D. R., Pullen, N., Aroney, S. T. N., Coltman, B. L., Osvatic, J., Woodcroft, B. J., Rattei, T., & Wagner, M. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf280 · Cited by 15
Improving Enzyme Fitness with Machine Learning
Patsch, D., & Buller, R. (2023) · CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry · doi:10.2533/chimia.2023.116 · Cited by 14
Protein Function Prediction With Functional and Topological Knowledge of Gene Ontology
Zhao, Y., Yang, Z., Hong, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., & Wang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · doi:10.1109/tnb.2023.3278033 · Cited by 15
Zhang, M., Gong, C., Ge, F., & Yu, D. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c02025 · Cited by 15
Chang, J., Fan, X., & Tian, B. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00115 · Cited by 15
Protein function prediction through multi-view multi-label latent tensor reconstruction
Armah-Sekum, R. E., Szedmák, S., & Rousu, J. (2024) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05789-4 · Cited by 16
Jia, P., Zhang, F., Wu, C., & Li, M. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae162 · Cited by 15
“It is worth noting that EGRET [122] generates protein embeddings using the self-supervised protein language model ProtTrans [128].”
Yaacov, A., Cohen, G. B., Landau, J., Hope, T., Simon, I., & Rosenberg, S. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101608 · Cited by 18
“22 The BERT-based transformer methodology was applied to protein and DNA sequences by ProtBert 23 and DNABERT.”
Machine learning for predicting protein properties: A comprehensive review
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhan, X., He, Y., Yang, Y., Cheng, L., & Alghazzawi, D. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128103 · Cited by 15
Pakhrin, S. C., Chauhan, N., Khan, S., Upadhyaya, J., Beck, M. R., & Blanco, E. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae643 · Cited by 15
Harnessing pre-trained models for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity
Li, J., & Gong, X. (2025) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-025-06064-w · Cited by 14
Ünlü, A., Ulusoy, E., Yiğit, M. G., Darcan, M., & Doğan, T. (2025) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103017 · Cited by 15
Aggregating residue-level protein language model embeddings with optimal transport
Naderializadeh, N., & Singh, R. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf060 · Cited by 17
Exploring the Protein Sequence Space with Global Generative ModelsPreprint
Romero‐Romero, S., Lindner, S., & Ferruz, N. (2023) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041471 · Cited by 18
Malbranke, C., Rostain, W., Depardieu, F., Cocco, S., Monasson, R., & Bikard, D. (2023) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011621 · Cited by 15
“Unlike evolutionary-based methods that rely solely on sequence information [12, 13], structural modeling of protein families incorporates physical and chemical considerations.”
MethodA Knowledge‐Guided Graph Learning Approach Bridging Phenotype‐ and Target‐Based Drug Discovery
Ye, Q., Zeng, Y., Jiang, L., Kang, Y., Pan, P., Chen, J., Deng, Y., Zhao, H., He, S., Hou, T., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202412402 · Cited by 16
Prediction and design of thermostable proteins with a desired melting temperature
Tijare, P. A., Kumar, N., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-98667-9 · Cited by 16
Designing a nitrogen-efficient cold-tolerant maize for modern agricultural systems
Ojeda‐Rivera, J. O., Barnes, A. C., Ainsworth, E. A., Angelovici, R., Basso, B., Brindisi, L. J., Brooks, M. D., Busch, W., Buttelmann, G. L., Castellano, M. J., et al. (2025) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koaf139 · Cited by 15
Wang, S.-Y., Bergman, M. T., Hall, C. K., & You, F.-Q. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01401 · Cited by 12
Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins
Grigson, S. R., Bouras, G. S., Dutilh, B. E., Olson, R., & Edwards, R. A. (2025) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00022-25 · Cited by 18
Recent Advances in the Prediction of Subcellular Localization of Proteins and Related Topics
Nakai, K., & Wei, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2022.910531 · Cited by 15
“Six was constructed based on ProtTrans and a significant improvement of its performance is reported (Teufel et al., 2022).”
BackgroundVariational autoencoder for design of synthetic viral vector serotypes
Lyu, S., Sowlati‐Hashjin, S., & Garton, M. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00787-2 · Cited by 27
Wang, Z., Meng, J., Dai, Q., Li, H., Xia, S., Yang, R., & Luan, Y. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124168 · Cited by 14
Shao, J., Chen, J., & Liu, B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3419250 · Cited by 14
Hu, J., Chen, K., Rao, B., Ni, J.-Y., Thafar, M. A., Albaradei, S., & Arif, M. (2024) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2024.115637 · Cited by 14
Kabir, A., Moldwin, A., Bromberg, Y., & Shehu, A. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae119 · Cited by 13
“While advancing remote homology prediction is an active area of research with an increasing number of models and methodologies (Hamamsy et al. 2023, Kaminski et al. 2023, Kilinc et al. 2023, Johnson et al. 2024, Liu et al. 2024) we focus here on the following SOTA PLMs: TAPE-BERT (Rao et al. 2019), Protein-BERT (Brand…”
InfluentialChuang, C.-C., Liu, Y., & Ou, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136252 · Cited by 17
dsAMP and dsAMPGAN: Deep Learning Networks for Antimicrobial Peptides Recognition and Generation
Zhao, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., & Luyan, Z. (2024) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics13100948 · Cited by 14
“In addition, the influence of pre-trained models from natural language processing, such as Protrans [25] and word2vec [26], is expanding into protein sequence analysis.”
BackgroundMethodAlsaedi, S. B., Gao, X., & Gojobori, T. (2025) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.70003 · Cited by 19
Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., You, N., Hu, W., Jiang, W., Lu, M., Xu, H., Dai, H., Fu, T., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101255 · Cited by 15
“Forexample,proteinlanguage modelssuchasESM2[19],ProteinBERT[20],andProtT5[21],through unsupervised pretraining on large-scale protein sequence datasets, have demonstratedthe ability to capture latent structural, functional, and evolutionary information embedded in amino acid sequences [22].”
PBertKla: a protein large language model for predicting human lysine lactylation sites
Lai, H., Luo, D., Yang, M., Zhu, T., Yang, H., Luo, X., Wei, Y., Xie, S., Hong, F., Shu, K., et al. (2025) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02202-1 · Cited by 16
Large language models transform biological research: from architecture to utilization
Wang, T., & Luo, Z. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4466-3 · Cited by 14
Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction is Achievable with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Hallee, L., & Gleghorn, J. P. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.07.544109 · Cited by 17
Structure-enabled enzyme function prediction unveils elusive terpenoid biosynthesis in archaeaPreprint
Samusevich, R., Akmeşe, S. M., Hebra, T., Bushuiev, R., Engst, M., Kulhánek, J., Bushuiev, A., Smith, J. D., Čalounová, T., Smrčková, H., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.29.577750 · Cited by 18
ProteinGLUE multi-task benchmark suite for self-supervised protein modeling
Capel, H., Weiler, R., Dijkstra, M., Vleugels, R., Bloem, P., & Feenstra, K. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19608-4 · Cited by 11
“Although the CB513 dataset 55 has been called redundant and outdated 11 , it is commonly used to evaluate model quality on the prediction of secondary structure in eight classes as it is sufficiently difficult to avoid ceiling effects.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFerrer Florensa, A., Almagro Armenteros, J. J., Kaas, R. S., Clausen, P. T. L. C., Nielsen, H., Rost, B., & Aarestrup, F. M. (2026) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag129 · Cited by 50
Language models for protein design
Lee, J. S., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2025) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103027 · Cited by 15
Xu, S., & Onoda, A. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01288 · Cited by 13
Foundation models in plant molecular biology: advances, challenges, and future directions
Xu, F., Wu, T., Qian, C., Wang, X., & Yan, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1611992 · Cited by 14
Tokenized and continuous embedding compressions of protein sequence and structure
Lu, A. X., Yan, W., Yang, K. K., Gligorijević, V., Cho, K., Abbeel, P., Bonneau, R., & Frey, N. C. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101289 · Cited by 15
Cao, C., Zhao, W., Guo, J., Wang, Z., Lü, A., & Liang, C. C. (2025) · The Innovation Medicine · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-med.2025.100154 · Cited by 14
Conditional generation of real antigen-specific T cell receptor sequences
Karthikeyan, D., Bennett, S., Reynolds, A. G., Vincent, B. G., & Rubinsteyn, A. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01096-6 · Cited by 16
TCRdesign: an antigen-specific generative language model for de novo design of T-cell receptors
Li, X., Yang, Q., Xu, L., Dong, W., Wang, K., Dong, S., Wang, W., Luo, G., Zhang, X., Yang, T., et al. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf691 · Cited by 14
Özden, F., Barazandeh, S., Akboğa, D., Tabrizi, S. S., Şeker, U. Ö. Ş., & Çiçek, A. E. (2026) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202500445 · Cited by 13
Running ahead of evolution—AI-based simulation for predicting future high-risk SARS-CoV-2 variants
Chen, J., Nie, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, K., Xu, F., Hu, Z., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Song, G., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) · The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications · doi:10.1177/10943420231188077 · Cited by 12
Guan, C., Luo, J., Li, S., Tan, Z. L., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Yamamoto, N., Zhang, C., Lu, Y., Chen, J., et al. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c05571 · Cited by 13
ProtT5 and random forests-based viscosity prediction method for therapeutic mAbs
Hao, X., & Fan, L. (2024) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106705 · Cited by 13
Predicting Protein Functions Based on Heterogeneous Graph Attention Technique
Zhao, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., & Wang, J. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3357834 · Cited by 13
Multilevel Attention Network with Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation for Drug-Target Prediction
Xie, Z., Tu, S., & Xu, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i1.27786 · Cited by 14
Yang, S., & Xu, P. (2024) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2024.115523 · Cited by 15
Fungtion: A Server for Predicting and Visualizing Fungal Effector Proteins
Li, J., Ren, J., Dai, W., Stubenrauch, C. J., Finn, R. D., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168613 · Cited by 13
Yu, X., Vangjeli, K., Prakash, A., Chhaya, M., Stanley, S. J., Cohen, N. D., & Huang, L. (2024) · Antibody Therapeutics · doi:10.1093/abt/tbae012 · Cited by 13
Zhang, B., Hou, Z., Yang, Y., Wong, K., Zhu, H., & Li, X. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06332-0 · Cited by 13
Heterogeneous biomedical entity representation learning for gene–disease association prediction
Meng, Z., Liu, S., Liang, S., Jani, B., & Meng, Z. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae380 · Cited by 13
“ESM-2b, a protein language model [12, 23], excels in generating comprehensive embeddings from protein sequences by learning from extensive evolutionary data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZhang, L., & Liu, T. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135762 · Cited by 14
Current computational tools for protein lysine acylation site prediction
Qin, Z., Ren, H., Zhao, P., Wang, K., Liu, H., Miao, C., Du, Y., Li, J., Wu, L., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae469 · Cited by 13
ParaAntiProt provides paratope prediction using antibody and protein language models
Kalemati, M., Noroozi, A., Shahbakhsh, A., & Koohi, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80940-y · Cited by 15
Luo, J., Zhao, K., Chen, J., Yang, C., Qu, F., Liu, Y., Jin, X., Yan, K., Zhang, Y., & Liu, B. (2024) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae084 · Cited by 21
Kang, B., Fan, R., Cui, C., & Cui, Q. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00733-1 · Cited by 13
Recent Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Discovery of New Antibacterial Agents
Bagdad, Y., & Miteva, M. A. (2024) · Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry · doi:10.2147/aabc.s484321 · Cited by 16
Lu, M., Wei, L., & Wu, R. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140096 · Cited by 15
Barlow Twins deep neural network for advanced 1D drug–target interaction prediction
Schuh, M. G., Boldini, D., Bohne, A. I., & Sieber, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-025-00952-2 · Cited by 13
MultiKD-DTA: Enhancing Drug-Target Affinity Prediction Through Multiscale Feature Extraction
Hu, R., Ge, R., Deng, G., Fan, J., Tang, B., & Wang, C. (2025) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-025-00697-4 · Cited by 13
Comparative Assessment of Protein Large Language Models for Enzyme Commission Number Prediction
Capela, J., Zimmermann‐Kogadeeva, M., van Dijk, A. D. J., de Ridder, D., Dias, Ó., & Rocha, M. (2025) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-025-06081-9 · Cited by 13
Li, W., Huang, B., Guo, M., Zeng, Z., Cai, T., Feng, L., Zhang, X., Guo, L., Jiang, X., Yin, Y., et al. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115773 · Cited by 13
Redondo, G. I. M., Perez-Canales, F. M., Fernández, J. M., Barrios-Núñez, I., Vázquez-Valls, M., Cases, I., Rojas, A. M., & Fernández, R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.28.582465 · Cited by 13
Chen, C., Xu, Y., Ouyang, J., Xiong, X., Łabaj, P. P., Chmielarczyk, A., Różańska, A., Zhang, H., Liu, K., Shi, T., et al. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf271 · Cited by 15
“Recent advances in protein language models, such as ESM2 [19], ProteinBERT [20] and ProtT5 [21] have been pre-trained and our previous studies has demonstrated their ability to extract complex sequence–structure function relationships [22, 23].”
Generative prediction of real-world prevalent SARS-CoV-2 mutation with in silico virus evolution
Liu, X., Nie, Z., Si, H.-R., Shen, X., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Dong, T., Xu, F., Ren, Z., Zhou, P., et al. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf276 · Cited by 13
Wu, Z., Chen, W., Hong, Y., Wang, Y., & Xu, P. (2025) · Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.synbio.2025.07.008 · Cited by 12
“The ProtTrans embed features can implicitly capture biophysical and structural information from amino acid sequences [35].”
Yu, Q., Zhou, C., Jiang, J., Shi, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf445 · Cited by 14
Nayar, G., Tartici, A., & Altman, R. B. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013424 · Cited by 12
Evaluating Pretrained Protein Language Model Embeddings as Proxies for Functional Similarity
Shaw, R., Love, S. D., & McWhite, C. D. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-025-10282-4 · Cited by 12
Kim, E., Lee, Y., Ryu, J., Kim, H., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2026) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d6ob00146g · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., Bhowmik, D., & Rost, B.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2022-10-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 7112-7127
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W3177500196
- Cited by
- 2,329
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 664 · 2025: 750 · 2024: 533 · 2023: 257 · 2022: 100
- FWCI
- 71.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1A6A1A10073437, NRF-2020M3A9G7103933)
- New Faculty Startup Fund and the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program
- Seoul National University
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- TensorFlow Research Cloud
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- protein language models, self-supervised learning, protein embeddings, secondary structure prediction, protein localization, ProtT5, Transformer-XL, XLNet, BERT, BFD, dimensionality reduction, protein sequence representation
- MeSH terms
- Supervised Machine Learning, Algorithms, Natural Language Processing, Proteins, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review