The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particle-in-Cell Simulations With Fluid Metastable Atoms in Capacitive Argon Discharges: Electron Elastic Scattering and Plasma Density Profile Transition
Abstract
Particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision (PIC/MCC) simulations are an important tool for understanding low-temperature plasma dynamics, and benchmark work is needed to build a solid base for the correctness of PIC/MCC codes. In our recent publication (Wenet al., 2021), benchmarking of the object-oriented PIC/MCC oopd1 code was performed against the well-establishedxpdp1code for a simplified argon reaction set. Furthermore, oopd1 was upgraded to incorporate the excited state atoms as space- and time-varying fluids. Here, we show more details and perform further analysis of the benchmark work. The plasma density profile transition is further explored; the “passively” flat plasma density profile in the absence of metastables is found to be parabolic at low pressure and flat at 1.6 and 5 Torr. In the presence of metastable atoms, the “parabolic” profile at 5 Torr becomes “flat” at 15 Torr due to the reduced excited state atom density in the discharge center, which decreases the step-wise ionization rates. In addition, the effects of electron elastic scattering, i.e., Coulomb-screening-based non-isotropic scattering, total elastic (and momentum transfer) cross-section-dependent non-isotropic scattering, and momentum transfer isotropic scattering on capacitive discharges, are examined, showing that at a low pressure of 50 mTorr Coulomb-screening-based scattering underestimates the plasma density and electron power absorption by around 15%. However, isotropic scattering and cross-sect…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Key ingredients for the energy conservation were the electric field update with the Ampère law even in the case of electrostatic simulations 321,322 and employing the same shape function for the electric field and current density calculations.”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [322]
Citations
Cites
Vahedi, V., & Surendra, M. (1995) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)00171-w · Cited by 1,065
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1002/0471724254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/5.0003114 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.352926 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.352251 · DOI
- 10.1016/0009-2509(92)85133-V · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3368862 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.5135575 · DOI
- 10.1006/jcph.1993.1034 · DOI
- 10.1088/0963-0252/2/4/007 · DOI
- 10.1088/0963-0252/20/2/024001 · DOI
- 10.1088/0022-3727/37/16/002 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9f68 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ac1b22 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.4775084 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ac3ba1 · DOI
- 10.1103/physreve.65.037402 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ac0b55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5a/017 · DOI
- 10.1109/TDEI.2013.6571436 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2403782 · DOI
- 10.1063/5.0076519 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5111734 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5126438 · DOI
- 10.1088/0963-0252/22/5/055020 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ab1463 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/aba920 · DOI
- 10.1088/0963-0252/22/3/035011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ac0b55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/369534.369540 · DOI
- 10.1145/272991.272995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0963-0252/23/3/035010 · DOI
- 10.1088/0963-0252/24/2/025017 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ab17ae · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/abf31d · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/abe728 · DOI
- 10.1088/0022-3727/41/16/165202 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4884225 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/abcc7a · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/ac2675 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6595/abde22 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms
Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., & Garrigues, L. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0153862 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, D.-Q., Krek, J., Gudmundsson, J. T., Kawamura, E., Lieberman, M. A., & Verboncoeur, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2548-2557
- ISSN
- 0093-3813 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9375
- OpenAlex
- W4293195788
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiatives (FA9550-18-1-0062, FA9550-21-1-0367)
- National Science Foundation/Department of Energy (NSF-DOE) Partnership (DE-SC0022078)
- Icelandic Research Fund (163086, 217999)
- AKT Display Division, Applied Materials Corporation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications
- Keywords
- particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision simulation, metastable atoms, argon discharge, capacitive discharge, elastic electron scattering, plasma density profile, Coulomb screening, momentum transfer cross sections, electron power absorption, non-thermal plasma, simulation benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle-in-Cell Simulations With Fluid Metastable Atoms in Capacitive Argon Discharges: Electron Elastic Scattering and Plasma Density Profile Transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tps.2022.3174401
- The paper
- Wen, D.-Q., Krek, J., Gudmundsson, J. T., Kawamura, E., Lieberman, M. A., & Verboncoeur, J. P. (2022). Particle-in-Cell Simulations With Fluid Metastable Atoms in Capacitive Argon Discharges: Electron Elastic Scattering and Plasma Density Profile Transition. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2022.3174401