Cited by 31Terahertz technology and applicationsSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods

Phase function effects on identification of terahertz spectral signatures using the discrete wavelet transform

Open access
Khani, Mahmoud E., Winebrenner, Dale P., Arbab, M. Hassan·2020·IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology

Abstract

We describe the application of the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) in extracting the characteristic absorption signatures of materials from terahertz reflection spectra. We compare the performance of different mother wavelets, including Daubechies, least asymmetric (LA), and Coiflet, based on their phase and gain functions and filter lengths. We show that the phase functions of the wavelet and scaling filters result in spectral shifts to the absorption lines in the wavelet domain. We provide a solution by calculating advancement coefficients necessary to achieve effective zero-phase-function DWT. We demonstrate the utility of this signal processing technique using α-lactose monohydrate/polyethylene samples with different levels of rough surface scattering. In all cases, the DWT-based algorithm successfully extracts resonant signatures at 0.53 and 1.38 THz, even when they are obscured by the rough surface scattering effects. The DWT analysis with accompanying phase corrections can be utilized as a robust technique for material identification in nondestructive evaluation using terahertz spectroscopy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tthz.2020.2997595

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, wavelet transform can separate characteristic resonant signatures from scattering-induced spectral artifacts.

    “We have shown that because wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales, when applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, it can separate the characteristic resonant signatures from the scattering-induced spectral artifacts [15,16,17,44].”

    From Translation-Invariant Zero-Phase Wavelet Methods for Feature Extraction in Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Conclusion reports that discrete wavelet transform made resonant signatures distinguishable despite scattering in THz signals reflected from smooth and rough sample pellets. The Results and Discussion also report suppression of scattering effects. The paper applies the method to deconvolved reflected-signal amplitude spectra, however, rather than demonstrating it on absorption coefficients; that part of the claim is not established. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales.

    “We have shown that because wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales, when applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, it can separate the characteristic resonant signatures from the scattering-induced spectral artifacts [15,16,17,44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Daubechies I, Ten lectures on wavelets, vol. 61. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (Siam), 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khani, M. E., Winebrenner, D. P., & Arbab, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology
Published
2020-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
656-666
ISSN
  • 2156-342X (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-3446
OpenAlex
W3030843968
Cited by
31
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ECCS-140768)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM112693)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Keywords
terahertz spectroscopy, discrete wavelet transform, phase function, mother wavelet selection, material identification, rough surface scattering, non-destructive testing, Daubechies wavelet, Coiflet wavelet, alpha-lactose monohydrate, polyethylene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review