Cited by 28Terahertz technology and applicationsSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsRandom lasers and scattering media

Diffuse terahertz spectroscopy in turbid media using a wavelet-based bimodality spectral analysis

Open access
Khani, Mahmoud E., Osman, Omar B., Arbab, M. Hassan·2021·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Current terahertz (THz) spectroscopy techniques only use the coherent light beam for spectral imaging. In the presence of electromagnetic scattering, however, the scattering-mitigated incoherent beams allow for flexible emitter-detector geometries, which enable applications such as seeing through turbid media. Despite this potential, THz spectroscopy using diffuse waves has not been demonstrated. The main obstacles are the very poor signal to noise ratios of the diffused fields and the resonance-like spectral artifacts due to multiple Mie scattering events that obscure the material absorption signatures. In this work, we demonstrate diffuse THz spectroscopy of a heterogeneous sample through turbid media using a novel technique based on the wavelet multiresolution analysis and the bimodality coefficient spectrum, which we define here for the first time using the skewness and kurtosis of the spectral images. The proposed method yields broadband and simultaneous material characterization at detection angles as high as 90° with respect to the incident beam. We determined the accuracy of the wavelet-based diffuse spectroscopy at oblique detection angles, by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, to be higher than 95%. This technique is agnostic to any a priori information on the spectral signatures of the sample materials or the characteristics of the scattering medium, and can be expanded for other broadband spectroscopic modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-02068-7

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, wavelet transform can separate characteristic resonant signatures from scattering-induced spectral artifacts.

    “We have shown that because wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales, when applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, it can separate the characteristic resonant signatures from the scattering-induced spectral artifacts [15,16,17,44].”

    From Translation-Invariant Zero-Phase Wavelet Methods for Feature Extraction in Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results section (page unavailable) describes multiresolution wavelet analysis that preserves resonant features while reducing scattering artifacts. The Discussion (page unavailable) says wavelet reconstruction mitigated scattering artifacts in diffuse THz extinction spectra. The cited paper applies the method to extinction spectra, not specifically to absorption or reflection coefficients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales.

    “We have shown that because wavelet transform provides spectral localization at multiple resolution scales, when applied to THz absorption or reflection coefficients, it can separate the characteristic resonant signatures from the scattering-induced spectral artifacts [15,16,17,44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [58]Daubechies, I. Ten Lectures on Wavelets, vol. 61 (Siam, 1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khani, M. E., Osman, O. B., & Arbab, M. H.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Arbab, M. Hassan
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-11-23
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
22804-22804
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217358123
Cited by
28
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112693)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Random lasers and scattering media
Keywords
terahertz spectroscopy, turbid media, wavelet multiresolution analysis, skewness and kurtosis, Mie scattering, incoherent light, material absorption, spectral artifacts, heterogeneous samples
MeSH terms
Emulsions, Lactose, Scattering, Radiation, Terahertz Spectroscopy, Wavelet Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review