The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes
Open accessAbstract
More than 30 organisms have been sequenced entirely. Here, we applied a variety of simple bioinformatics tools to analyze 29 proteomes for representatives from all three kingdoms: eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and archaebacteria. We confirmed that eukaryotes have relatively more long proteins than prokaryotes and archaes, and that the overall amino acid composition is similar among the three. We predicted that ∼15%–30% of all proteins contained transmembrane helices. We could not find a correlation between the content of membrane proteins and the complexity of the organism. In particular, we did not find significantly higher percentages of helical membrane proteins in eukaryotes than in prokaryotes or archae. However, we found more proteins with seven transmembrane helices in eukaryotes and more with six and 12 transmembrane helices in prokaryotes. We found twice as many coiled‐coil proteins in eukaryotes (10%) as in prokaryotes and archaes (4%–5%), and we predicted ∼15%–25% of all proteins to be secreted by most eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Every tenth protein had no known homolog in current databases, and 30%–40% of the proteins fell into structural families with >100 members. A classification by cellular function verified that eukaryotes have a higher proportion of proteins for communication with the environment. Finally, we found at least one homolog of experimentally known structure for ∼20%–45% of all proteins; the regions with structural homology covered 20%–30% of all residues. These numbers may or may not suggest that there are 1200–2600 folds in the universe of protein structures. All predictions are available at http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori
Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41483 · Cited by 3,529
The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria
Andersson, S. G. E., Zomorodipour, A., Andersson, J. O., Sicheritz-Pontén, T., Alsmark, U. C. M., Podowski, R. M., Näslund, A. K., Eriksson, A.-S., Winkler, H. H., & Kurland, C. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24094 · Cited by 1,697
The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils
Crick, F. H. C. (1953) · Acta Crystallographica · doi:10.1107/s0365110x53001964 · Cited by 1,578
Cited by
Flexible nets: The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks
Dunker, A. K., Cortese, M. S., Romero, P., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Uversky, V. N. (2005) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04948.x · Cited by 1,122
Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling
Uversky, V. N., Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.747 · Cited by 847
Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
Oldfield, C. J., Cheng, Y., Cortese, M. S., Romero, P., Uversky, V. N., & Dunker, A. K. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi050736e · Cited by 630
Better prediction of functional effects for sequence variants
Hecht, M., Bromberg, Y., & Rost, B. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-16-s8-s1 · Cited by 569
Self-citationThe structure of bacterial outer membrane proteins
Schulz, G. E. (2002) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(02)00577-1 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., & Rost, B.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1970-1979
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2159136327
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.10101
- The paper
- Liu, J., & Rost, B. (2001). Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.10101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.