The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural Differences in Student and Teacher Perceptions Concerning the Role of Grammar Instruction and Corrective Feedback: USA‐Colombia
Abstract
A questionnaire administered to 607 Colombian foreign language (FL) students and 122 of their teachers, as well as to 824 U.S. FL students and 92 teachers, elicited student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of explicit grammar instruction and corrective feedback in FL learning. Data comparisons indicated relatively high agreement between students as a group and teachers as a group across cultures on the majority of questions. A number of discrepancies were, however, evident between student and teacher beliefs within each culture, as well as in comparisons of the two groups across cultures, particularly regarding the role of formal grammar instruction in language learning. Given that discrepancies in student and teacher belief systems can be detrimental to learning, it is important that teachers explore their students' perceptions regarding those factors believed to enhance the learning of a new language and make efforts to deal with potential conflicts between student beliefs and instructional practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Borg, S. (2003) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444803001903 · Cited by 2,543
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Effective Foreign Language Teaching: A Comparison of Ideals
BROWN, A. V. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x · Cited by 461
Form‐Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated?
SPADA, N., & LIGHTBOWN, P. M. (2008) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x · Cited by 396
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
Teacher Motivation Strategies, Student Perceptions, Student Motivation, and English Achievement
BERNAUS, M., & GARDNER, R. C. (2008) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00753.x · Cited by 366
Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.18goo · Cited by 224
Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention
Sato, M. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x · Cited by 142
Modeling Teacher Beliefs and Practices in Context: A Multimethods Approach
NISHINO, T. (2012) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01364.x · Cited by 131
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Ellis, R. (2004) · The Handbook of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9780470757000.ch21 · Cited by 126
Language Awareness in language learning and teaching: A research agenda
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000079 · Cited by 109
Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816679030 · Cited by 82
(2014) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 53
Karimi, M. N., Abdullahi, K., & Khales Haghighi, J. (2016) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2014.920847 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulz, R. A.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-258
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W1975066227
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 90.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.