The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes
Abstract
Research has shown that social threat correlates with ideological authoritarianism, but the issues of causal direction and specificity of threat to particular ideological attitudes remain unclear. Here, a theoretical model is proposed in which social threat has an impact on authoritarianism specifically, with the effect mediated through social worldview. The model was experimentally tested with a sample of undergraduates who responded to one of three hypothetical scenarios describing a future New Zealand that was secure, threatening, or essentially unaltered. Both threat and security influenced social worldview, but only threat influenced authoritarianism, with differential effects on two factorially distinct subdimensions (conservative and authoritarian social control attitudes) and with the effects of threat mediated through worldview. There was a weak effect of threat on social dominance that was entirely mediated through authoritarianism. The findings support the proposed theoretical model of how personal and social contextual factors causally affect people's social worldviews and ideological attitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments
Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174046 · Cited by 387
Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data
Sales, S. M. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035588 · Cited by 360
Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987
Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.629 · Cited by 329
Cited by
The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.75 · Cited by 873
Self-citationCollective narcissism and its social consequences.
de Zavala, A. G., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016904 · Cited by 704
Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x · Cited by 618
Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002709333296 · Cited by 329
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity
Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-222
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W1986008536
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0162-895x.00322
- The paper
- Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.