Cited by 214Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

REVIEW: Do Polycultures Promote Win-Wins or Trade-Offs in Agricultural Ecosystem Services? A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Iverson, Aaron L., Marín, Linda E., Ennis, Katherine K., Gonthier, David J., Connor‐Barrie, Benjamin T., Remfert, Jane L., Cardinale, Bradley J., Perfecto, Ivette·2014·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Agriculture comprises the largest global land use, makes it a leading cause of habitat loss. It is therefore critical to identify how to best construct agricultural systems that can simultaneously provide food and other ecosystem services. This challenge requires that we determine how to maximize win‐win relationships and minimize trade‐offs between services. Through meta‐analysis, we tested whether within‐field crop diversification (polyculture) can lead to win‐win relationships between two ecosystem services: yield of a focal crop species and biocontrol of crop pests. We selected only studies that recorded both services (N = 26 studies; 301 observations), allowing us to better determine the underlying mechanisms of our principal findings. We calculated log‐response ratios for both ecosystem services in mono‐ and polycultures. We found win‐win relationships between per‐plant yield of the primary crop and biocontrol in polyculture systems that minimized intraspecific competition via substitutive planting. Additionally, we found beneficial effects on biocontrol with no difference in per‐unit area yield of the primary crop in polyculture fields at high cropping densities (additive planting) where legumes were used as the secondary crop. These results suggest that there is a strong potential for win‐win relationships between biocontrol and per‐unit area yield under certain scenarios. Our findings were consistent across geographical regions and by type of primary crop. We did not find evidence that biocontrol had an effect on yield, but rather, both were independently affected by polycultural cropping. Synthesis and applications. We show that well‐designed polycultures can produce win‐win outcomes between per‐plant, and potentially per‐unit area, primary crop yield and biocontrol. Biocontrol services are consistently enhanced in polycultures, so polyculture management that focuses on yield optimization is likely to be the best strategy for maximizing both services. In doing so, we suggest that practitioners utilize polycultures that decrease plant–plant competition through a substitution of relatively large quantities of the primary crop for compatibly harvestable secondary crops. Additionally, if planting at high cropping densities, it is important that legumes be the secondary crop.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2664.12334

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge on trade-offs and carry-over effects from different crop diversification strategies is limited by existing data and performance measures predominantly focused on single crops, rather than complete rotations.

    “This knowledge is limited by existing data and performance measures predominantly focused on single crops, rather than complete rotations.”

    From An Actor-Oriented Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework to Support a Transition towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems Based on Crop Diversification (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Limitations section says missing secondary-crop yield data forced the analysis to use primary-crop yield, and Data Collection says crop rotations were excluded. These passages support a limitation of this meta-analysis, but they do not establish that performance measures across crop-diversification research predominantly focus on single crops rather than complete rotations, or address carry-over effects. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iverson, A. L., Marín, L. E., Ennis, K. K., Gonthier, D. J., Connor‐Barrie, B. T., Remfert, J. L., Cardinale, B. J., & Perfecto, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan 440 Church Street Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA
Corresponding author
Iverson, Aaron L.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-03
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1593-1602
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2016683789
Cited by
214
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
23.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NSF (1050680)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
polyculture, crop diversification, ecosystem services, biological control, crop yield, win-win relationships, trade-offs, intraspecific competition, Fabaceae, secondary crops, agroecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review