The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Dimensions of Personality Disorder From Domains and Facets of the Five Factor Model
Abstract
We compared the utility of several trait models for describing personality disorder in a heterogeneous clinical sample (N = 94). Participants completed the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP, Clark, 1993b), a self‐report measure that assesses traits relevant to personality disorder, and two measures of the Five Factor Model: the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R; Costa and McCrae, 1992) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John, Donahue, & Kentle, 1991). Regression analyses indicated substantial overlap between the SNAP scales and the NEO‐PI‐R facets. In addition, use of the NEO‐PI‐R facets afforded substantial improvement over the Five Factor Model domains in predicting interview‐based ratings of DSM‐IV personality disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 1994), such that the NEO facets and the SNAP scales demonstrated roughly equivalent levels of predictive power. Results support assessment of the full range of NEO‐PI‐R facets over the Five Factor Model domains for both research and clinical use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A psychobiological model of temperament and character
Cloninger, C. R. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008 · Cited by 5,458
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996
Higher-order factors of the Big Five.
Digman, J. M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1246 · Cited by 1,839
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 1×
“There is greater disagreement at lower-order levels, where Costa & McCrae’s selection and placement of the particular NEO-PI-R facet scales necessarily involved a number of subjective decisions (Block, 1995).”
BackgroundPersonality disorders and the five factor model of personality
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362 · Cited by 1,653
Cited by
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,018
The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001 · Cited by 915
Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology.
Clark, L. A. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.505 · Cited by 796
Self-citationWidiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.494 · Cited by 752
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, S. K., & Clark, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-222
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2045938035
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Dimensions of Personality Disorder From Domains and Facets of the Five Factor Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-6494.00142
- The paper
- Reynolds, S. K., & Clark, L. A. (2001). Predicting Dimensions of Personality Disorder From Domains and Facets of the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
