Cited by 595Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Development of Argument Skills

Kuhn, Deanna, Udell, Wadiya·2003·Child Development

DOI 10.1111/1467-8624.00605

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This work sought to obtain experimental evidence to corroborate cross-sectional patterns of development in argument skills and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention designed to foster development of these skills in academically at-risk 13- to 14-year-olds. Students participated in 16 sessions of a collaborative, goal-based activity providing dense exercise of argumentive thinking. One condition included peer dialogues; another did not. The former was the more effective, although both groups progressed. Participants showed increased frequency of usage of powerful argumentive discourse strategies, such as counterargument, and decreased frequency of less effective strategies. Quality of individual arguments (for or against a claim) also improved, supporting the existence of a close relation between these two kinds of argument skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00605

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Advances in Instructional Psychology
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315864341 · Cited by 2,538
Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology
Billig, M. S. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,146
The concept of activity in Soviet psychology
Kozulin, A. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203434185-9 · Cited by 2,114
The Skills of Argument
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Self-citation
Personal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
Hofer, B. K. (2009) · Cited by 1,652
Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10008 · Cited by 1,434
Education and mind in the knowledge age
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2294 · Cited by 1,266
Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Cited by 1,114
Who Is Rational?
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603432 · Cited by 956
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811306 · Cited by 807

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Anderson, 1998, Literacy for all, 170
Haith, 1998, Handbook of child psychology: Vol II. Cognition, perception, and language, 199
Kuhn, 2001, Mechanisms of cognitive development: Neural and behavioral perspectives, 221
Kuhn, Education for thinking
Voss, 2001, Argumentation in psychology [Special issue]

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 593

Who's the Boss? Patterns of Control in Adolescents' Sibling Relationships
Tucker, C. J., Updegraff, K. A., & Baril, M. E. (2010) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00620.x · Cited by 57
Exploring Science Teachers’ Argumentation and Personal Epistemology About Global Climate Change
Liu, S., & Roehrig, G. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9617-3 · Cited by 66
The Psychometric Modeling of Scientific Reasoning: a Review and Recommendations for Future Avenues
Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Dablander, F. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9455-5 · Cited by 64
Activity-Bound and Activity-Unbound Arguments in Response to Parental Eat-Directives at Mealtimes: Differences and Similarities in Children of 3-5 and 6-9 Years Old
Arcidiacono, F., & Bova, A. (2015) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.002 · Cited by 56
Cognitive and linguistic features of adolescent argumentative writing: Do connectives signal more complex reasoning?
Taylor, K. S., Lawrence, J. F., Connor, C. M., & Snow, C. E. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9898-6 · Cited by 54
Mechanisms of sibling socialization in normative family development
Whiteman, S. D., Becerra, J. M., & Killoren, S. E. (2009) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.255 · Cited by 54
Improving Children’s Competence as Decision Makers
Xin, Z., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J. A., Miller, B., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Lin, T., Zhang, J., Jadallah, M., Scott, T., Sun, J., et al. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215618663 · Cited by 53
Argument relevance and structure. Assessing and developing students’ uses of evidence
Macagno, F. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.002 · Cited by 55
The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework
Deane, P. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844 · Cited by 62
The development of scientific reasoning: Hypothesis testing and argumentation from evidence in young children
Köksal, Ö., & Sodian, B. (2018) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.011 · Cited by 56
From Cognitive-Domain Theory to Assessment Practice
Bennett, R. E., Deane, P., & van Rijn, P. W. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1141683 · Cited by 53
A framework for content area writing: Mediators and moderators
Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2010.02.01.1 · Cited by 50
Exploring new depths: Applying machine learning for the analysis of student argumentation in chemistry
Martin, P. P., Kranz, D., Wulff, P., & Graulich, N. (2023) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21903 · Cited by 60
The effect of a graph‐oriented computer‐assisted project‐based learning environment on argumentation skills
Hsu, P.-S., Dyke, M. V., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2014) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12080 · Cited by 49
Interactivity: A Potential Determinant of Learning by Preparing to Teach and Teaching
Kobayashi, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02755 · Cited by 49
Effects of a training intervention to foster precursors of evaluativist epistemological understanding and intellectual values
Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Rieß, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., & Berthold, K. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.002 · Cited by 49
Cognitive Strategies
Pressley, M. G., & Hilden, K. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0212 · Cited by 50
Citizenship education: the feasibility of a participative approach
Guérin, L. J. F., van der Ploeg, P., & Sins, P. H. M. (2013) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.844945 · Cited by 47
Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students
de la Puente, M., Torres, J., Troncoso, A. L. B., Meza, Y. Y. H., & Carrascal, J. X. M. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00347-0 · Cited by 46
“University students who utilized ChatGPT to practice argumentation skills demonstrated significant improvements in constructing clear, well-supported arguments compared to a control group (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
Influential
Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?
Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0211-y · Cited by 48
Comparing Student Experiences with Story Discussions in Dialogic Versus Traditional Settings
Reznitskaya, A., & Glina, M. B. (2012) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.658458 · Cited by 55
Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching
Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (2020) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2 · Cited by 52
The Nature and Correlates of Sibling Influence in Two‐Parent African American Families
Whiteman, S. D., Bernard, J. M. B., & McHale, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00698.x · Cited by 44
Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity
Lazarou, D., Erduran, S., & Sutherland, R. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003 · Cited by 51
Young Children’s Ability to Produce Valid and Relevant Counter-Arguments
Köymen, B., O’Madagain, C., Domberg, A., & Tomasello, M. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13338 · Cited by 43
Dialogic argumentation as a bridge to argumentative thinking and writing / La argumentación dialógica como puente para el pensamiento y la escritura argumentativa
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016) · Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2015.1111608 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – the role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation
Garrecht, C., Reiss, M. J., & Harms, U. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944 · Cited by 42
The Key Practice, Discuss and Debate Ideas: Conceptual Framework, Literature Review, and Provisional Learning Progressions for Argumentation
Deane, P., & Yi, S. (2015) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12079 · Cited by 48
The Development and Validation of the Assessment of Scientific Argumentation in the Classroom (ASAC) Observation Protocol: A Tool for Evaluating How Students Participate in Scientific Argumentation
Sampson, V. D., Enderle, P. J., & Walker, J. P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_12 · Cited by 42
Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students' argumentation on socioscientific issues
Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., Checchi, K. D., & Munier, V. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21816 · Cited by 62
The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences
Greco, S., Perret‐Clermont, A., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J., & Schär, R. G. (2018) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v38i4.5029 · Cited by 42
Children's reasoning with peers in cooperative and competitive contexts
Domberg, A., Köymen, B., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12213 · Cited by 42
What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?
Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2009) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v29i4.2905 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
How Lay Cognition Constrains Scientific Cognition
Shtulman, A. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12260 · Cited by 39
Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies
Macagno, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Kuhn, D. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9271-6 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Growing Extraordinary Writers: Leadership Decisions to Raise the Level of Writing Across a School and a District
Calkins, L. M., & Ehrenworth, M. (2016) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1499 · Cited by 35
Instructional discourse and argumentative writing
Morris, J. A., Miller, B., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Lin, T., Scott, T., Zhang, J., Sun, J., & Ma, S. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001 · Cited by 37
Developing Argumentation Strategies in Electronic Dialogs: Is Modeling Effective?
Mayweg-Paus, E., Macagno, F., & Kuhn, D. (2015) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2015.1040323 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review
Hendriks, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., Felton, M. K., Iordanou, K., Jucks, R., & Zimmermann, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572744 · Cited by 41
Developing Face-to-Face Argumentation Skills: Does Arguing on the Computer Help?
Iordanou, K. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.668732 · Cited by 37
Taiwanese argumentation skills: Contrastive rhetoric perspective
Cheng, F.-W., & Chen, Y.-M. (2009) · Taiwan international ESP journal · doi:10.6706/tiespj.2009.1.1.2 · Cited by 33
Development of a framework for graph choice and construction
Angra, A., & Gardner, S. M. (2016) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00152.2015 · Cited by 32
Dialogic thinking
Fernyhough, C. (2009) · Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581533.004 · Cited by 45
Effect of a PBL teaching method on learning about nursing care for patients with depression
Arrue, M., de Retana, B. R. D. A. F., Zarandona, J., & Cillero, I. H. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.016 · Cited by 31
The Effect of Task Instructions on Students’ Use of Repetition in Argumentative Discourse
Gilabert, S., García-Milà, M., & Felton, M. K. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.663191 · Cited by 31
Rational Argument
Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0015 · Cited by 32
Scaffolding learners in authentic, problem based e-learning environments: The Geography Challenge
Brickell, G., & Herrington, J. (2006) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1284 · Cited by 31
Raising metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic readers and writers
Calix, A. L. (2015) · Cited by 31
A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., Le, N.-T., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7 · Cited by 37
Using the Cognitive Apprenticeship Web-based Argumentation System to Improve Argumentation Instruction
Tsai, C., Jack, B. M., Huang, T.-C., & Yang, J.-T. D. (2011) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9339-7 · Cited by 32
Do sophisticated epistemic beliefs predict meaningful learning? Findings from a structural equation model of undergraduate biology learning
Lee, S. W., Liang, J., & Tsai, C. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1240384 · Cited by 30
Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Mateos, M., Granado-Peinado, M., & Martín, E. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3 · Cited by 29
Preparation for Future Collaboration: Cognitively Preparing for Learning From Collaboration
Lam, R., & Kapur, M. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1386156 · Cited by 29
Examining how classroom communities developed practice-based epistemologies for science through analysis of longitudinal video data.
Krist, C. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000417 · Cited by 35
Do children need to learn to collaborate?
Leman, P. J., & Oldham, Z. (2004) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.07.002 · Cited by 29
A Prospective Cognition Analysis of Scientific Thinking and the Implications for Teaching and Learning Science
Zimmerman, C., & Croker, S. J. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology · doi:10.1891/1945-8959.13.2.245 · Cited by 28
THE IMPACT OF ARGUMENTATION-BASED TEACHING AND SCENARIO-BASED LEARNING METHOD ON THE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Aslan, S. (2019) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/19.18.171 · Cited by 28
The effects of Socratic questioning on critical thinking in web-based collaborative learning
Lee, M., Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2014) · Education as Change · doi:10.1080/16823206.2013.849576 · Cited by 41
A Space for Debate. How diagrams support collaborative argumentation-based learning
van Amelsvoort, M. A. A. (2006) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 28
Developing Environmentally Responsible Behaviours Through the Implementation of Argumentation- and Problem-Based Learning Models
Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Aydoğdu, M. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9720-0 · Cited by 29
Enhancing advanced Theory of Mind skills in primary school: A training study with 7‐ to 8‐year‐olds
Bianco, F., Lombardi, E., Massaro, D., Castelli, I., Valle, A., Marchetti, A., & Lecce, S. (2019) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2155 · Cited by 28
Enhancing adolescent girls’ argument skills in reasoning about personal and non-personal decisions
Udell, W. (2007) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.02.003 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
The analysis and reconciliation of students’ rebuttals in argumentation activities
Lin, Y., & Hung, J.-F. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1134848 · Cited by 34
Generic Versus Context-Specific Prompts for Supporting Self-Regulation in Mathematical Problem Solving Among Students With Low or High Prior Knowledge
Kramarski, B., Weiss, I., & Sharon, S. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology · doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.2.197 · Cited by 27
Group-work discussions and content knowledge gains: Argumentative inner speech as the missing link?
Larrain, A. S. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.002 · Cited by 27
Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams
Salminen, T., Marttunen, M. J., & Laurinen, L. I. (2010) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00354.x · Cited by 27
Assessing and Supporting Argumentation with Online Rubrics
Lu, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v6n7p66 · Cited by 26
Learning from Writing in College Biology
Armstrong, N. A., Wallace, C. S., & Chang, S. (2007) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9062-9 · Cited by 26
Wie Vorschulkinder Geltung etablieren
Bose, I., & Hannken-Illjes, K. (2017) · Studia Linguistica · doi:10.19195/0137-1169.35.7 · Cited by 25
Developing an analytical framework for argumentation on energy consumption issues
Jin, H., Mehl, C. E., & Lan, D. H. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21237 · Cited by 25
Deliberative Teaching as an Emergent Field: The Challenge of Articulating Diverse Research Agendas to Promote Educational Experiences for Citizenship
Larrain, A. S., Fortes, G., & Rojas, M. T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660825 · Cited by 25
Activating Students’ Argumentative Resources on Socioscientific Issues by Indirectly Instructed Reasoning and Negotiation Processes
Jafari, M. G., & Meisert, A. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09869-x · Cited by 34
University Students’ Knowledge Structures and Informal Reasoning on the Use of Genetically Modified Foods: Multidimensional Analyses
Wu, Y. (2012) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9343-9 · Cited by 24
The efficacy of a Web-based counterargument tutor
Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., Petrovic, M., Albrecht, M., & Kopp, K. J. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.691 · Cited by 24
A cross‐cultural study of the effect of a graph‐oriented computer‐assisted project‐based learning environment on middle school students' science knowledge and argumentation skills
Hsu, P.-S., Dyke, M. V., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12118 · Cited by 24
Motivating and Shaping Scientific Argumentation in Lab Reports
Gouvea, J., Appleby, L., Fu, L., & Wagh, A. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316 · Cited by 27
Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Colombian Undergraduate Diplomacy Students: ChatGPT-Assisted and Traditional Debate Methods
Pacheco, M. A. D. L. P., Torres, J., Troncoso, A. L. B., Murillo, H. J. G., & Carrascal, J. X. M. (2025) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2025.2449936 · Cited by 23
Students’ Attitudes to Information in the Press: Critical Reading of a Newspaper Article With Scientific Content
Prat, B. O., Márquez, C., & Puig, N. S. (2014) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9397-3 · Cited by 27
How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams
van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.004 · Cited by 23
DESAFIOS METODOLÓGICOS NA PESQUISA DA ARGUMENTAÇÃO EM ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS
Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P., & Brocos, P. (2015) · Ensaio · doi:10.1590/1983-2117201517s08 · Cited by 27
The Two Faces of Scientific Argumentation: Applications to Global Climate Change
Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Owens, M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_2 · Cited by 23
Argumentation as a situated discursive practice: Social and epistemic functions
Heller, V. (2023) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100699 · Cited by 22
Explorative mathematical argumentation: a theoretical framework for identifying and analysing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning
Reuter, F. (2023) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-022-10199-5 · Cited by 22
The Effects of Case Libraries in Supporting Collaborative Problem-Solving in an Online Learning Environment
Tawfik, A. A., Sánchez, L., & Saparova, D. R. (2014) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9230-8 · Cited by 22
Supporting emergent bilinguals’ argumentation: Evaluating evidence in informational science texts
Symons, C. (2017) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.02.006 · Cited by 22
The Effect of Argumentation-Based Social Studies Teaching on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Critical Thinking Tendencies of Students
Yılmaz-Özcan, N., & Tabak, S. (2019) · lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.26822/iejee.2019257669 · Cited by 21
Processing and Representation of Arguments in One-Sided Texts About Disputed Topics
Wolfe, M. B. W., Tanner, S. M., & Taylor, A. R. (2013) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2013.828480 · Cited by 21
Training Interventions to Foster Skill and Will of Argumentative Thinking
Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Rieß, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., & Berthold, K. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1363689 · Cited by 21
Two studies examining argumentation in asynchronous computer mediated communication
Joiner, R., Jones, S., & Doherty, J. (2008) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/17437270802416848 · Cited by 21
The Effect of Argument Mapping Supported with Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers' Argumentation Skills
Ucar-Longford, B., & Çevik, Y. D. (2020) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2020.1815107 · Cited by 28
Dialogic teaching of controversial public issues in a Chinese middle school
Shi, Y., Shen, X., Tao, W., Cheng, L., & Wang, A. (2021) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100533 · Cited by 25
AppleTree system for effective computer-supported collaborative argumentation: an exploratory study
Chen, W., Tan, J. S. H., Zhang, S., Pi, Z., & Lyu, Q. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10258-5 · Cited by 20
First steps in teaching argumentation: A South African study
Braund, M., Scholtz, Z., Sadeck, M., & Koopman, R. (2012) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.007 · Cited by 20
Better to Agree or Disagree? The Role of Critical Questioning and Elaboration in Argumentative Discourse
Thiebach, M., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Jucks, R. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000174 · Cited by 20
Building arguments: key to collaborative scaffolding
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., Marroquín, M. S. R., Gleisner, S., & Marquinez, J. T. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1333010 · Cited by 22
Habilidades de argumentación escrita: Una propuesta de medición para estudiantes de quinto básico
Larraín, A., Freire, P., & Olivos, T. (2014) · Psicoperspectivas Individuo y Sociedad · doi:10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol13-issue1-fulltext-287 · Cited by 34
Argumentation and Knowledge Construction
Kimmerle, J., Fischer, F., & Creß, U. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_10 · Cited by 22
The Development of Early Adolescents’ Social Perspective Taking Through Small-Group Discussion
Wen, Z., Lin, T., Glassman, M., Kim, S., Tilak, S., Nagpal, M. N., & Ha, S. Y. (2023) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/02724316221149630 · Cited by 19
A Framework for Analyzing Development of Argumentation through Classroom Discussions
(2012) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/978160805015411201010028 · Cited by 19
Cognitive engagement and attitude development
Lao, J. R., & Kuhn, D. (2002) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(02)00117-x · Cited by 19
Self-citation

Authors: Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
Affiliations: Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author: Kuhn, Deanna
ORCID: Kuhn, Deanna
Udell, Wadiya
Venue: Child Development
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 2003-09-12
Volume: 74
Issue: 5
Pages: 1245-1260
ISSN: 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
1467-8624
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00605
OpenAlex: W2078619954
Cited by: 595
References: 59
Citations by year: 2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI: 14.61
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights (vor)
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Child Development (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords: argumentative reasoning, counterargument, peer discussion, cooperative learning, at-risk students, adolescents, argument quality
MeSH terms: Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, New York City, Peer Group, Poverty, Problem Solving, Remedial Teaching, Risk Factors, Thinking, Underachievement, Urban Population, Verbal Behavior, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Development of Argument Skills

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks