The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Argument Skills
Abstract
This work sought to obtain experimental evidence to corroborate cross-sectional patterns of development in argument skills and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention designed to foster development of these skills in academically at-risk 13- to 14-year-olds. Students participated in 16 sessions of a collaborative, goal-based activity providing dense exercise of argumentive thinking. One condition included peer dialogues; another did not. The former was the more effective, although both groups progressed. Participants showed increased frequency of usage of powerful argumentive discourse strategies, such as counterargument, and decreased frequency of less effective strategies. Quality of individual arguments (for or against a claim) also improved, supporting the existence of a close relation between these two kinds of argument skills.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“University students who utilized ChatGPT to practice argumentation skills demonstrated significant improvements in constructing clear, well-supported arguments compared to a control group (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the use of LLMs to provide immediate, targeted feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of students' arguments has been found to significantly improve their ability to construct clear, wellsupported arguments (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the significant improvements in students' argumentation skills observed in this study align with the findings of Kuhn and Udell (2003) and Kuhn and Crowell (2011), who emphasized the effectiveness of interactive and targeted approaches, such as LLM-based training programs, in honing argumentation skills.”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Udell (2003)
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the work of Kuhn and Udell (2003), who emphasized the importance of dialogic approaches in developing argumentation skills, this research suggests that interaction with AI acts as a valuable dialogic partner.”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Udell (2003)
In the citing paper
“Argument skills increase between childhood and adolescence (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education (2021) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
Citations
Cites
Advances in Instructional Psychology
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315864341 · Cited by 2,538
Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology
Billig, M. S. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,146
The concept of activity in Soviet psychology
Kozulin, A. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203434185-9 · Cited by 2,114
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Self-citationPersonal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
Hofer, B. K. (2009) · Cited by 1,652
Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10008 · Cited by 1,434
Education and mind in the knowledge age
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2294 · Cited by 1,266
Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Cited by 1,114
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603432 · Cited by 956
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811306 · Cited by 807
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anderson, 1998, Literacy for all, 170
- Haith, 1998, Handbook of child psychology: Vol II. Cognition, perception, and language, 199
- Kuhn, 2001, Mechanisms of cognitive development: Neural and behavioral perspectives, 221
- Kuhn, Education for thinking
- Voss, 2001, Argumentation in psychology [Special issue]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 593
Cayci, B. (2020) · Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4604 · Cited by 7
Young children evaluate and follow others’ arguments when forming and revising beliefs
Hannes Rakoczy, B., Miosga, N., & Schultze, T. (2021) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/sode.12533 · Cited by 9
Zhu, Y., & He, A. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2150996 · Cited by 7
Özkan, F. E., Hartwell, K., & Köymen, B. (2023) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13374 · Cited by 8
Argumentation-Based Learning in Social Studies Teaching
Bulut, B., Kaçar, T., & ARIKAN, İ. (2019) · Journal of Education and Learning · doi:10.5539/jel.v8n3p89 · Cited by 7
Henderson, J. B., Zillmer, N., Holton, A., Weiner, S. W., Greenwald, E., Goss, M., Lopez, M. L., Morales, C., Pearson, P. D., & McNeill, K. L. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09921-4 · Cited by 9
Collaboration and Emotion in Way
Schrier, K. “., & Shaenfield, D. E. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801738-8.00012-9 · Cited by 7
A Systematic Review of Dialogue-Based Teaching Intervention in Chinese Classrooms
Zheng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311241310880 · Cited by 11
Testing the use of variation theory in teaching critical thinking—a field experimental study
Larsson, K., & Andersson, K. (2025) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09721-y · Cited by 6
Park, J.-Y., & Kim, H. (2012) · Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education · doi:10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.604 · Cited by 6
Ortiz, M. I. C., Castelló, M., & Santos, S. L. (2019) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2260 · Cited by 6
Identifying Students’ Mathematical Argumentation Competence in Solving Cubes and Pyramid Problems
Tristanti, L. B., & Nusantara, T. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012118 · Cited by 6
Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemic
Macagno, F., & Trevisan, A. C. (2024) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.339.08mac · Cited by 9
Abchi, V. S., Dolz, J., & Borzone, A. M. (2012) · Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/s0103-18132012000200008 · Cited by 6
TIC y argumentación: Análisis de tareas propuestas por docentes universitarios
José David, C. V., & Tamayo, A. M. C. (2014) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 6
Gárate, M. C., García, J. M. A., & Herranz, J. L. Z. (2014) · Enseñanza de las Ciencias Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas · doi:10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1112 · Cited by 6
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A TAIWANESE COMMUNICATION PROGRESSION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION
Hsin, M.-C., Chien, S.-P., Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, C.-Y., & Yore, L. D. (2014) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9589-y · Cited by 6
Sabatini, J., Bennett, R. E., & Deane, P. (2011) · Cited by 5
Bova, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4_4 · Cited by 6
Turner, M. M., Yao, S., Baker, R., Goodman, J., & Materese, S. A. (2010) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/00028533.2010.11821732 · Cited by 6
Tamaño del grupo, argumentación y lectura de tablas en estudiantes universitarios
Curcio, J. M., Peralta, N. S., & Castellaro, M. (2019) · Diversitas · doi:10.15332/22563067.4350 · Cited by 6
Yıldırır, H. E. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijres.v6i2.859 · Cited by 6
SOSYAL BİLGİLER ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ GÜNCEL OLAYLARI ARGÜMANTASYON TEKNİĞİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRMELERİ
AKKAN, M., & Akhan, N. E. (2020) · Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.33692/avrasyad.702930 · Cited by 6
Successful Problem Solving in Genetics Varies Based on Question Content
Avena, J. S., McIntosh, B. B., Whitney, O. N., Wiens, A., & Knight, J. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-01-0016 · Cited by 7
Siswanto, S., Hartono, H., Subali, B., & Masturi, M. (2022) · Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction · doi:10.47750/pegegog.12.03.19 · Cited by 6
El uso de discurso argumentativo en la enseñanza de ciencias: Un estudio exploratorio
Larrain, A. S., & Freire, P. (2012) · Estudios pedagógicos · doi:10.4067/s0718-07052012000200009 · Cited by 6
Debatable Truths: What Buddhist Argumentation Reveals about Critical Thinking
Lugli, L. (2015) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2015.1026150 · Cited by 6
Lin, C.-H., Chiu, C., Hsu, C.-C., & Wang, T.-I. (2014) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0193-2 · Cited by 6
Cultural differences in justificatory reasoning
Soong, H., Lee, R., & John, G. (2011) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.571764 · Cited by 6
Fostering argumentation-based computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education
Noroozi, O. (2013) · doi:10.18174/242736 · Cited by 6
The development of children's argument skills
Macedo, A. (2011) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 6
Fortes, G., Larrain, A. S., & Gómez, M. (2020) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i2.365 · Cited by 5
ÇANKAYA, Ö., & Aydoğan, N. (2022) · Asian Journal of Education and Training · doi:10.20448/edu.v8i2.3963 · Cited by 5
Dawson, V., & Eilam, E. (2022) · Learning sciences for higher education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_19 · Cited by 5
Lee, W. W. S., & Chan, V. C. W. (2016) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-016-0322-1 · Cited by 5
Level of Skill Argued Students on Physics Material
Viyanti, V., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2017) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012043 · Cited by 5
Las competencias argumentativas en la formación universitaria
Ruiz, R. A. T., Villa, M. G. O., Torres, D. L. R., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2018) · INNOVA Research Journal · doi:10.33890/innova.v3.n1.2018.336 · Cited by 5
Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V., & Strömberg, C. (2019) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2019.1681377 · Cited by 5
Doruk, M., & Doruk, G. (2020) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2020.1782494 · Cited by 5
Elementary schoolchildren know a logical argument when they see one
Markovits, H., Brisson, J., de Chantal, P., & St-Onge, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1189918 · Cited by 5
Effects of Three Pedagogies on Learning Outcomes in a Psychology of Gender Lecture
Reber, J. S., Downs, S. D., & Nelson, J. A. P. (2017) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628317692617 · Cited by 5
Primary Students’ Argumentation on Factors Affecting Dissolving
Angeloudi, A., Papageorgiou, G. J., & Markos, A. (2018) · Science education international · doi:10.33828/sei.v29.i3.1 · Cited by 5
Ackermann, N., & Kavadarli, B. (2021) · Citizenship Social and Economics Education · doi:10.1177/20471734211050283 · Cited by 5
Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during online collaborative learning
Janssen, J. J. H. M., Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., & Broeken, M. (2006) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 5
Teaching Academic Argument in an Urban Middle School: A Case Study of Two Approaches
Coker, D. L., & Erwin, E. (2011) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085910377426 · Cited by 9
Bahçivan, E., Yavuzalp, N., Kıngır, S., Demirbağ, M., Güneş, E., Üstündağ, M. T., Kılıç, M., Özdemir, Y., & Öztürk, N. (2025) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2025.2574527 · Cited by 4
THE EFFECTS OF INDEXING PROMPTS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CASE LIBRARY LEARNING
Park, J., Lee, J., & Kim, D. (2020) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/20.78.394 · Cited by 4
Modelos de argumentación aplicados en la enseñanza de las ciencias: una revisión sistemática
Garcia, L. M. Á., & Martínez, Á. G. (2023) · PAPELES · doi:10.54104/papeles.v15n29.1424 · Cited by 4
A holistic theorization of the developmental potential of peer dialogue: revisiting Vygotsky
Salas, M. H., & Larrain, A. S. (2023) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-023-00730-4 · Cited by 4
TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., Graham, S., & Cao, Y. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09949-z · Cited by 4
ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENT AND ARGUMENTATION MADE BY S1 STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
Pratama, R. D. (2015) · RETAIN Journal of Research in English Language Teaching · doi:10.26740/rt.v3i2.12824 · Cited by 4
Aditomo, A. (2014) · Ubaya Repository (University of Surabaya) · Cited by 4
Morais, T., Silva, H., Lopes, J. P., & Dominguez, C. E. (2017) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1267654 · Cited by 4
Éthier, M., Lefrançois, D., & Larocque, S. (2021) · Carrefours de l éducation · doi:10.3917/cdle.052.0108 · Cited by 4
Dialogische Klassengesprächsführung im Geschichtsunterricht
Zimmermann, M. (2022) · Wochenschau Verlag eBooks · doi:10.46499/1920 · Cited by 5
Examining the Effect of Teacher Guidance on Collaborative Argumentation in Middle Level Classrooms
Hsu, P.-S., Dyke, M. V., & Chen, Y. (2015) · RMLE Online · doi:10.1080/19404476.2015.11641185 · Cited by 4
Uses of arguments from definition in children’s argumentation
Schär, R. G. (2016) · Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · Cited by 4
Probosari, R. M., Widyastuti, F., Sajidan, P., Suranto, M., & Prayitno, B. A. (2017) · International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (ICTTE) · doi:10.2991/ictte-17.2017.68 · Cited by 4
Törün, F., & FIRAT, E. A. (2020) · Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18069/firatsbed.644631 · Cited by 4
DÖRDÜNCÜ VE BEŞİNCİ SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ARGÜMAN YAPILARI
Kalyon, D. Ş., & Taşar, M. F. (2020) · Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.33692/avrasyad.643598 · Cited by 4
Calderón, M., Silva, M., Rojas, M. C. V., Larrain, A. S., Araya, M. C. R., Silva, H. T., Sánchez, Á., Moreno, C., & Ramírez, C. M. (2020) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.169.59245 · Cited by 8
Kinder im Gespräch – mit Kindern im Gespräch
Bose, I., Hannken-Illjes, K., Kurtenbach, S., Arendt, B., & Timme, F. &. (2019) · Frank & Timme eBooks · doi:10.26530/20.500.12657/42800 · Cited by 4
Development of Self-Efficacy for Argumentation Scale
Kıran, R., & Feyzioğlu, E. Y. (2021) · Kuramsal Eğitimbilim · doi:10.30831/akukeg.891057 · Cited by 4
Effects of Agricultural Sales CDE Modules on Content Knowledge and Argumentation Skill
Sapp, S. B., & Thoron, A. C. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural Education · doi:10.5032/jae.2014.05093 · Cited by 4
Roviati, E., Widodo, A., Purwianingsih, W., & Riandi, R. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022108 · Cited by 4
Chapter 25. Producing Scholarly Texts: Writing in English in a Politically Stigmatized Country
Riazi, M. (2012) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2012.0452.2.25 · Cited by 4
Making AI annoying on purpose: when helpful tools don't always help
Konradt, L., Boote, D. N., & Taub, M. (2026) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100343 · Cited by 4
Luginbühl, M., Koch, T., Spiess, O., & Müller-Feldmeth, D. (2026) · Research on Children and Social Interaction · doi:10.3138/rcsi-2025-0011 · Cited by 3
Identifying General Cognitive Abilities Involved in Argument Comprehension and Evaluation
Britt, M. A., Kopp, K. J., Durik, A. M., Blaum, D., & Hastings, P. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000173 · Cited by 3
Comprensión y producción de argumentación escrita en estudiantes de educación primaria
Freire, P., Larrain, A. S., Verdugo, S., Gómez, M., & Grau, V. (2020) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i1.323 · Cited by 3
Rapanta, C. (2024) · Educação Sociedade & Culturas · doi:10.24840/esc.vi67.741 · Cited by 11
Karışan, D. (2015) · The Journal of International Educational Sciences · doi:10.16991/inesjournal.161 · Cited by 3
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning
Bauri, S. (2022) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-022-09572-8 · Cited by 3
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. B. G. (2009) · Cited by 3
Grooms, J. A. (2011) · PhDT · Cited by 3
Bova, A. (2015) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.09.001 · Cited by 3
Ozturk, E., & Uçuş, Ş. (2015) · Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health · doi:10.21891/jeseh.07331 · Cited by 3
Making Use of the Dual Functions of Evidence in Adolescents' Argumentation
Khait, V. (2014) · doi:10.7916/d8t72fm3 · Cited by 3
Forget, M.-H. (2015) · Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation · doi:10.7202/1029141ar · Cited by 3
What Are the Cognitive Skills Adolescents Need for Life in the Twenty-First Century?
Kuhn, D., & Holman, A. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139042819.006 · Cited by 3
Self-citationProfessores como Facilitadores da Argumentação entre Estudantes: Uma Necessidade Emergente
Rapanta, C. (2017) · Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia · doi:10.14195/1647-8614_50-2_3 · Cited by 3
Zhu, X., Loh, E. K. Y., Yu, G., Tam, L. C. W., & Liao, X. (2019) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2018-0096 · Cited by 3
Chapter 28. Construction of Caring Identities in the New Work Order
Nikolaidou, Z., & Karlsson, A.-M. (2012) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2012.0452.2.28 · Cited by 6
YİTMEZ, B. G., KABAKÇI, D. A., Ecemiş, Ü. Ö., ARAMIŞ, Z. F., & Günhan, B. C. (2023) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1189952 · Cited by 3
Exploring preservice teachers' views of intelligence
Poliquin, A. (2010) · Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) · doi:10.34917/2153990 · Cited by 3
Analysis of Student’s Skills on the Concept Dynamic Electricity
Safrina, I., Maknun, J., & Hasanah, L. (2017) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012104 · Cited by 3
Onderzoeksrapport Samen werken aan Bèta Burgerschap
Guérin, L. J. F., Sins, P. H. M., Klaver, L. T., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2021) · doi:10.14261/ff0c6282-93e2-41a7-b60ab9bceb2a4328 · Cited by 3
Capturing Argument in Agent-Based Models
Assaad, L., Fuchs, R., Phillips, K., Schöppl, K., & Hahn, U. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10215-2 · Cited by 2
Bouyias, Y. N., Demetriadis, S., & Καρακώστας, Α. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2010.93 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Processes Induced from Fading-out of the Collaboration Script During Argumentation
Bouyias, Y. N., & Demetriadis, S. (2010) · International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS) · doi:10.1109/incos.2010.56 · Cited by 2
Employing the intellectual virtues to better understand argumentation interventions in education
Fortes, G., Brasi, L. D., & Baumtrog, M. D. (2024) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v12i2.1247 · Cited by 4
Zang, S., Yang, Z., Lin, P., Sheng, J., Bai, Y., & Deng, H. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101885 · Cited by 3
The Varied Dimensions of Interactivity Exploring Student Depth of Learning
Chadha, A. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-5598-9.ch007 · Cited by 2
Argument in the process of starting writer
García, J. G. (2014) · Acta Universitaria · doi:10.15174/au.2014.633 · Cited by 2
Green, W. J. (2007) · African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/10288457.2007.10740607 · Cited by 2
Evaluating the quality of dialogical argumentation in CSCL
Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1599600.1599603 · Cited by 2
Kim, S. H. (2013) · Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society · doi:10.5762/kais.2013.14.11.5559 · Cited by 2
Ensino de estratégias de escrita para a composição do texto argumentativo
Prata, M. J., Festas, I., de Oliveira, A. L., Ferreira, S. A., & Damião, M. H. (2015) · Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación · doi:10.17979/reipe.2015.0.01.924 · Cited by 2
Analyzing the Effect of Argumentation Program for Improving Teachers' Conceptions of Evolution
Kwon, J., & Cha, H. (2015) · Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education · doi:10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0691 · Cited by 2
Argument-Driven Inquiry in the Information Literacy Instruction in Taiwan
Chen, L. C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2015) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_28 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhn, Deanna
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1245-1260
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2078619954
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- argumentative reasoning, counterargument, peer discussion, cooperative learning, at-risk students, adolescents, argument quality
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, New York City, Peer Group, Poverty, Problem Solving, Remedial Teaching, Risk Factors, Thinking, Underachievement, Urban Population, Verbal Behavior, Black People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review