The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Argument Skills
Abstract
This work sought to obtain experimental evidence to corroborate cross-sectional patterns of development in argument skills and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention designed to foster development of these skills in academically at-risk 13- to 14-year-olds. Students participated in 16 sessions of a collaborative, goal-based activity providing dense exercise of argumentive thinking. One condition included peer dialogues; another did not. The former was the more effective, although both groups progressed. Participants showed increased frequency of usage of powerful argumentive discourse strategies, such as counterargument, and decreased frequency of less effective strategies. Quality of individual arguments (for or against a claim) also improved, supporting the existence of a close relation between these two kinds of argument skills.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“University students who utilized ChatGPT to practice argumentation skills demonstrated significant improvements in constructing clear, well-supported arguments compared to a control group (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the use of LLMs to provide immediate, targeted feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of students' arguments has been found to significantly improve their ability to construct clear, wellsupported arguments (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the significant improvements in students' argumentation skills observed in this study align with the findings of Kuhn and Udell (2003) and Kuhn and Crowell (2011), who emphasized the effectiveness of interactive and targeted approaches, such as LLM-based training programs, in honing argumentation skills.”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Udell (2003)
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the work of Kuhn and Udell (2003), who emphasized the importance of dialogic approaches in developing argumentation skills, this research suggests that interaction with AI acts as a valuable dialogic partner.”
From Investigating the Use of chatGPT as a Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in International Relations Debates among Undergraduate Students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Udell (2003)
In the citing paper
“Argument skills increase between childhood and adolescence (Kuhn & Udell, 2003).”
From Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education (2021) · cites this paper as Kuhn & Udell, 2003
Citations
Cites
Advances in Instructional Psychology
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315864341 · Cited by 2,538
Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology
Billig, M. S. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,146
The concept of activity in Soviet psychology
Kozulin, A. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203434185-9 · Cited by 2,114
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Self-citationPersonal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
Hofer, B. K. (2009) · Cited by 1,652
Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10008 · Cited by 1,434
Education and mind in the knowledge age
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2294 · Cited by 1,266
Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Cited by 1,114
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603432 · Cited by 956
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811306 · Cited by 807
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anderson, 1998, Literacy for all, 170
- Haith, 1998, Handbook of child psychology: Vol II. Cognition, perception, and language, 199
- Kuhn, 2001, Mechanisms of cognitive development: Neural and behavioral perspectives, 221
- Kuhn, Education for thinking
- Voss, 2001, Argumentation in psychology [Special issue]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 593
Carrasco, A., Kent, R., & Keranen, N. (2012) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2012.0452.2.19 · Cited by 37
Technology in support of argument construction in school science
Evagorou, M., & Avraamidou, L. (2008) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523980701847156 · Cited by 17
The Effect of Peer-Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge
Larrain, A. S., Freire, P., Grau, V., López, P., Salvat, I., Silva, M., & Gastellu, V. (2018) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cad.20263 · Cited by 18
Stanley, S. L., & Lawson, C. A. (2020) · Journal of Media Literacy Education · doi:10.23860/jmle-2020-12-1-1 · Cited by 18
Effects of Argument Scaffolding and Source Credibility on Science Text Comprehension
Lin, T., Horng, R., & Anderson, R. C. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.769423 · Cited by 19
Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2003) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 18
Γεωργίου, Μ., Mavrikaki, E., Halkia, K., & Papassideri, I. S. (2020) · American Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12691/education-8-1-3 · Cited by 19
Preschool children’s use of meta-talk to make rational collaborative decisions
Hartwell, K., Brandt, S., Boundy, L., Barton, G., & Köymen, B. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13750 · Cited by 17
Using exchange structure analysis to explore argument in text‐based computer conferences
North, S., Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2008) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/17437270802417150 · Cited by 16
Yi, S., Deane, P., Graf, E. A., & van Rijn, P. W. (2013) · Cited by 17
Lasry, N., Charles, E. S., & Whittaker, C. (2016) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.4955150 · Cited by 17
Pallarès, G., Bächtold, M., & Munier, V. (2020) · RDST · doi:10.4000/rdst.3573 · Cited by 17
Rational argument, rational inference
Hahn, U., Harris, A. J. L., & Oaksford, M. (2012) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.1080/19462166.2012.689327 · Cited by 18
Circular arguments, begging the question and the formalization of argument strength
Hahn, U., Oaksford, M., & Corner, N. (2005) · BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) · Cited by 17
Sriprakash, A., Singh, M. J., & Qi, J. (2024) · RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) · doi:10.25439/rmt.27394368 · Cited by 16
Martins, M. R., & Macagno, F. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21708 · Cited by 21
Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming arguments in mock jurors' verdict justifications
Weinstock, M. P. (2011) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.575191 · Cited by 17
Weinstock, M. P. (2009) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.003 · Cited by 17
Büber, A., & Çoban, G. Ü. (2017) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.367 · Cited by 18
An investigation into the development of mathematical modelling competencies of grade 7 learners.
Biccard, P. (2010) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 16
Enlivening the curriculum: The power of philosophical inquiry
Knight, S., & Collins, C. (2010) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878510381630 · Cited by 15
Learning About Plate Tectonics Through Argument-Writing
Klein, P. D., & Samuels, B. M. (2010) · Alberta Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v56i2.55398 · Cited by 15
Weinstock, M. P. (2005) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2005.10473272 · Cited by 17
Acar, Ö. (2015) · Kocaeli Üniversitesi - AVESİS · Cited by 15
How Dialogic Settings Influence Evidence Use in Adolescent Students
Mayweg-Paus, E., & Macagno, F. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000171 · Cited by 15
Comparing Students' Individual Written and Collaborative Oral Socioscientific Arguments.
Knight, A. M., & McNeill, K. L. (2015) · The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education · Cited by 15
Kumdang, P., Kijkuakul, S., & Chaiyasith, W. C. (2018) · Journal of Science Learning · doi:10.17509/jsl.v2i1.11995 · Cited by 15
Ageitos, N., Mauriz, B. P., & Colucci‐Gray, L. (2019) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00086-6 · Cited by 15
Oral Argumentation Skills between Process and Product
Luginbühl, M., & Müller-Feldmeth, D. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7020139 · Cited by 14
English Teaching in an Indonesian Vocational High School Majoring Industrial Machinery Engineering
Natsir, M. H., Purba, A. S., Ellyana, E., Saragih, A. T., & Amal, B. K. (2022) · AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1221 · Cited by 14
Argümantasyon Yönteminin Kullanıldığı Deneysel Çalışmaların Analizi: Bir Meta-Sentez Çalışması
İnam, A., & Güven, S. (2019) · The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences · doi:10.34137/jilses.584642 · Cited by 14
Argumentation, Critical Reasoning, and Problem Solving
Spector, J. M., & Park, S. W. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3540-2_2 · Cited by 14
Exploring the Argumentation Pattern in Modeling-based Learning about Apparent Motion of Mars
Park, S.-K. (2015) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1423a · Cited by 14
Leong, C. K., Shum, M. S. K., Tai, C. P., Ki, W. W., & Zhang, D. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9873-2 · Cited by 15
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Marx, R. W. (2004) · Cited by 14
Iordanou, K. (2022) · Contributions from biology education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92006-7_6 · Cited by 13
Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing
Backman, Y., Reznitskaya, A., Gardelli, V., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2023) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883221148664 · Cited by 13
Rapanta, C., & Macagno, F. (2019) · Revista Lusófona de Educação · doi:10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle45.09 · Cited by 13
Seda, E. R., & Kırındı, T. (2020) · Gazi Journal of Education Sciences · doi:10.30855/gjes.2020.06.03.004 · Cited by 13
Students’ Argumentation in Science Lessons
Anisa, A., Widodo, A., Riandi, R., & Muslim, M. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00320-8 · Cited by 13
Jeong, A. C., Kim, H. Y., & |, |. (2022) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.008 · Cited by 13
Attending to individual recipients’ knowledge when generating persuasive analogies
Olguín, V., Trench, M., & Minervino, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1304942 · Cited by 16
Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context
Karışan, D., Tüzün, Ö. Y., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017) · Journal of Human Sciences · doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i4.4949 · Cited by 13
Hsu, P.-S., Dyke, M. V., Smith, T. J., & Looi, C. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9574-1 · Cited by 13
Learning Through Collaborative Argumentation
Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6734-4_3 · Cited by 16
Kuhn, D., & Goh, W. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149338 · Cited by 13
Self-citationRamírez-Roncancio, N. L., & Latorre, D. (2020) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i1.352 · Cited by 12
Rural–urban migration, family arrangement, and children's welfare: Evidence from China's rural areas
Wei, L., Yang, Y., Zhang, J., & Si, L. (2022) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12720 · Cited by 12
Linking knowledge justification with peers to the learning of social perspective taking
Kim, S., Lin, T., Glassman, M., Ha, S. Y., Wen, Z., Nagpal, M. N., Cash, T. N., & Kraatz, E. (2023) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2023.2185597 · Cited by 12
Characterizing Behavioral and Brain Changes Associated with Practicing Reasoning Skills
Mackey, A. P., Singley, A. T. M., Wendelken, C., & Bunge, S. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137627 · Cited by 12
The process of thinking by prospective teachers of mathematics in making arguments
Tristanti, L. B. (2019) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.6853 · Cited by 14
Karışan, D. (2016) · The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education · Cited by 12
The Influence of Infusion Learning Strategy on Students’ Mathematical Argumentatıon Skill
Tristanti, L. B., & Nusantara, T. (2022) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15216a · Cited by 11
Thomas, D. P. (2022) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2022.101120 · Cited by 11
Acar, Ö., Patton, B. R., & White, A. L. (2015) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.8 · Cited by 11
ARGUMENTATION IN UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY LABORATORIES
Walker, J. P. (2011) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 11
English Language Arts Literacy Framework
Deane, P., & Sabatini, J. (2011) · Cited by 11
Concept of Evidence and the Quality of Evidence-Based Reasoning in Elementary Students
Miralda-Banda, A., García-Milà, M., & Felton, M. K. (2019) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09685-y · Cited by 11
Fuccio, M. D., Kuhn, D., Udell, W., & Callender, K. (2009) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888690802606750 · Cited by 11
Self-citationArgumentation in Secondary School Students' Structured and Unstructured Chat Discussions
Salminen, T., Marttunen, M. J., & Laurinen, L. I. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.47.2.d · Cited by 11
The Role of Rhetoric in a Dialogical Approach to Thinking
Larrain, A., & Haye, A. (2012) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00487.x · Cited by 11
Peer Groups as a Context for School Misconduct: The Moderating Role of Group Interactional Style
Ellis, W. E., Zarbatany, L., Chen, X., Kinal, M., & Boyko, L. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12722 · Cited by 11
Scaffolding Argumentation in Asynchronous Online Discussion
Kim, H. S., & Oh, E. G. (2018) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2018040103 · Cited by 11
An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions
Schär, R. G. (2020) · Argumentation in context · doi:10.1075/aic.19 · Cited by 10
Bouton, E., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2023) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100717 · Cited by 14
Martin, P. P., Kranz, D., & Graulich, N. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00440-y · Cited by 14
Differences between low and high achievers in whole-classroom dialogue participation quality
Bouton, E., Yosef, D., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102088 · Cited by 16
Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates
Goodwin, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Argumentation in Context · doi:10.1075/jaic.18008.goo · Cited by 10
Suephatthima, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2018) · Science education international · doi:10.33828/sei.v29.i3.2 · Cited by 10
Utomo, Y. S., Ashadi, A., & Sarwanto (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012095 · Cited by 16
Pre-service primary teachers' argumentation in socioscientific issues
Pezaro, C., Wright, T., & Gillies, R. M. (2014) · European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30935/scimath/9627 · Cited by 10
Cedillos, E. M., Wolfe, C. R., Widmer, C. L., Brust-Renck, P. G., Weil, A. M., & Reyna, V. F. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0681-1 · Cited by 10
Öztürk, A. (2017) · Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction · doi:10.14527/pegegog.2017.020 · Cited by 10
From Cow Paths to Conversation
Aull, L. L., & Ross, V. (2020) · Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture · doi:10.1215/15314200-7878975 · Cited by 10
Analysis of preservice teachers’ lesson plans to determine the extent of transfer of argumentation
Quinlan, C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1753125 · Cited by 10
Positively Transforming Classroom Practice Through Dialogic Teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118996874.ch17 · Cited by 10
Postdigital bedingte Souveränität
Engel, J., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Carnap, A. (2022) · merz | medien + erziehung · doi:10.21240/merz/2022.6.2 · Cited by 9
A importância do método: pesquisa qualitativa em contexto de sala de aula
Fortes, G., Ramírez-Roncancio, N. L., & de Souza, D. N. (2018) · Argumentos Pró-Educação · doi:10.24280/ape.v3i7.285 · Cited by 9
Guzmán-Cedillo, Y. I., Macías, R. D. C. F., & Segura, F. T. (2013) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.175681 · Cited by 9
Schmidt, H. K., Rothgangel, M., & Grube, D. (2017) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.001 · Cited by 9
How number and size of text boxes in argument diagrams affect opinions
van Amelsvoort, M., & Schilperoord, J. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.03.003 · Cited by 9
Astarina, A. D., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2019) · Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20890 · Cited by 9
Prat‐Sala, M., & Duuren, M. V. (2020) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628320957981 · Cited by 9
The improvement of students’ argumentation skills through Remap-NHT learning model
Zahra, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Astriani, M. (2021) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0043291 · Cited by 9
Argumentation Skills: An Analysis on EFL Students’ Essays Based on Toulmin’s Model of Argument
Jumariati, Febriyanti, E. R., & Rizki, M. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211021.013 · Cited by 9
Research on Critique and Argumentation from the Technology Enhanced Learning in Science Center
Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., Chang, H., Zhang, H., Tate, E. D., & Schwendimann, B. A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_9 · Cited by 9
The Dimensions of Argumentative Texts and Their Assessment
Macagno, F., & Rapanta, C. (2019) · Studia paedagogica · doi:10.5817/sp2019-4-1 · Cited by 9
Fostering critical reasoning: Developing argumentative competence in early and middle primary years
Chen, H., Lewis, H. B., & Myhill, D. (2021) · The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy · doi:10.1007/bf03652072 · Cited by 9
Use of automated scoring and feedback in online interactive earth science tasks
Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., Mao, L., & Pallant, A. (2016) · IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) · doi:10.1109/isecon.2016.7457538 · Cited by 8
Come Now, Let Us Reason Together
Dacey, A. (2020) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v40i1.6024 · Cited by 11
The development of a coding scheme to analyse argumentative utterances during group-work
Larrain, A. S., Freire, P., Strasser, K., & Grau, V. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100657 · Cited by 8
Differential effects of majority and minority influence on argumentation strategies
Tomasetto, C., Mucchi‐Faina, A., Alparone, F. R., & Pagliaro, S. (2008) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510802257510 · Cited by 8
Knowledge generation in online forums: a case study in the German educational domain
Griesbaum, J., Mahrholz, N., Kiedrowski, K. V. L., & Rittberger, M. (2015) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-09-2014-0112 · Cited by 8
Ortiz, M. I. C., & Castelló, M. (2015) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2015.1111604 · Cited by 8
Larraín, A., Freire, P., Moretti, R., Requena, M., & Sabat, B. (2015) · Calidad en la educación · doi:10.4067/s0718-45652015000200007 · Cited by 18
Uluay, G., & Aydın, A. (2018) · Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2018.18.39790-471189 · Cited by 8
Measuring Students' Scientific Argumentation Associated with Uncertain Current Science
Lee, H., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., & Liu, O. L. (2013) · Cited by 7
Li, J. (2013) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2013010102 · Cited by 7
Chadha, A. (2018) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2018070101 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhn, Deanna
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1245-1260
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2078619954
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- argumentative reasoning, counterargument, peer discussion, cooperative learning, at-risk students, adolescents, argument quality
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, New York City, Peer Group, Poverty, Problem Solving, Remedial Teaching, Risk Factors, Thinking, Underachievement, Urban Population, Verbal Behavior, Black People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
