Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Aim Of Belief

Wedgwood, Ralph·2002·Noûs
DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 291

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wedgwood, R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Wedgwood, Ralph
Venue
Noûs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
36
Issue
s16
Pages
267-297
ISSN
  • 0029-4624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0068
DOI
10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10
OpenAlex
W2170490457
Cited by
279
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 101 d)
Locations
Noûs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
epistemology of belief, justification, epistemic normativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.