The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality Predictors of Citizenship Performance
Abstract
This article briefly introduces the criterion construct, citizenship performance, describes how this construct is different from task performance and presents a recently derived 3‐dimension model of the domain. Evidence is then reviewed for links between personality constructs and citizenship performance. An update of the Organ and Ryan (1995) meta‐analysis of personality‐organizational citizenship behavior relationships suggests slightly higher correlations than those found in the meta‐analysis and also indicates that personality, at least the conscientiousness and dependability constructs, correlates more highly with citizenship performance than with task performance. These results are discussed in the broader context of building models of job performance and studying linkages between individual differences and relatively specific criterion constructs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-t · Cited by 807
Cited by
The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · Cited by 7,143
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x · Cited by 2,555
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives
Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141 · Cited by 2,308
Self-citationAdvances in subjective well-being research
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 · Cited by 2,003
Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190500083020 · Cited by 1,170
Dispositional and Organizational Influences on Sustained Volunteerism: An Interactionist Perspective
Penner, L. A. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00270 · Cited by 989
Self-citationHappiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1024409732742 · Cited by 717
Productivity of Older Workers: Perceptions of Employers and Employees
Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2010) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00331.x · Cited by 348
Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures
Salgado, J. F. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903769647201 · Cited by 329
Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence.
Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000415 · Cited by 194
Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: a new meta-analysis.
Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., & Bobko, P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.694 · Cited by 171
The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors
Konrath, S., Ho, M.-H., & Zarins, S. (2016) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9417-3 · Cited by 146
Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Landis, B. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0008 · Cited by 114
Direct and contextual effects of individual values on organizational citizenship behavior in teams.
Arthaud-Day, M. L., Rode, J. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027352 · Cited by 96
Greenidge, D., Devonish, D., & Alleyne, P. (2014) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.913591 · Cited by 93
Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Role Breadth: A Meta‐Analytic and Cross‐Cultural Analysis
Jiao, C., Richards, D. A., & Hackett, R. D. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21555 · Cited by 53
Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University
Cuadrado, D., Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11216062 · Cited by 37
Dwivedi, U., Kumari, S., Akhilesh, K., & Nagendra, H. (2015) · AYU (An international quarterly journal of research in Ayurveda) · doi:10.4103/0974-8520.190693 · Cited by 27
Otero, I., Cuadrado, D., & Martínez, A. (2020) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/jwop2020a17 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Selection and Assessment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 52-69
- ISSN
- 0965-075X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2148645150
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
