CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174Competitive and Knowledge IntelligenceEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competitive Analysis and New Venture Performance: Understanding the Impact of Strategic Uncertainty and Venture Origin

Zahra, Shaker A., Neubaum, Donald O., El–Hagrassey, Galal M.·2002·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
DOI 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Effective competitive analysis (CA) is important for success in today's marketplace. CA may be particularly important to new ventures that may lack experience in their industries and knowledge of their rivals. Using survey data from 228 new ventures, this study concludes that the formality, comprehensiveness, and user orientation of CA activities are positively associated with new venture performance. Strategic uncertainty and venture origin also significantly moderate the relationship between CA and new venture performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bernhardt D., 1994, Financial Times
  2. Brush C., 1992, Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 41
  3. Burgelman R., 1986, Inside corporate innovation
  4. Fuld L.M., 1985, Competitor intelligence: How to get—how to use it
  5. Mohan–Neill S.I., 1995, Journal of Small Business Management, 33, 10
  6. Penrose E.T., 1959, The theory of the growth of the firm
  7. Porter M.E., 1980, Competitive strategy
  8. 10.2307/259392 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & El–Hagrassey, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Kuwait University.
ORCID
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6520
DOI
10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001
OpenAlex
W2082529075
Cited by
174
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
competitive analysis, new venture performance, strategic uncertainty, user orientation, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review