Cited by 37Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcarePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder

Open access
Mandarelli, Gabriele, Tarsitani, Lorenzo, Parmigiani, Giovanna, Polselli, Gian M., Frati, Paola, Biondi, Massimo, Ferracuti, Stefano·2014·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Despite the growing amount of data, much information is needed on patients' mental capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment for acute mental disorders. The present study was undertaken to compare differences in capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment in patients treated voluntarily and involuntarily and to investigate the role of psychiatric symptoms, competency, and cognitive functioning in determining voluntariness of hospital admission. Involuntary patients were interviewed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and their data were compared with those for age- and sex-matched voluntary patients. Involuntary patients performed worse in all MacCAT-T subscales. Capacity to consent to treatment varied widely within each group. Overall, involuntary patients have worse consent-related mental capacity than those treated voluntarily, despite capacity to consent to treatment showing a significant variability in both groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.12420

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mandarelli, G., Tarsitani, L., Parmigiani, G., Polselli, G. M., Frati, P., Biondi, M., & Ferracuti, S.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Mandarelli, Gabriele
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
1002-1007
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W2167427425
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
decision-making capacity, informed consent, psychiatric treatment, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, acute mental disorders, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Coloured Progressive Matrices, cognitive function, psychiatric symptoms, competency assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Informed Consent, Interview, Psychological, Italy, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Mental Competency, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review