Cited by 20Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seasonal impact of scavenger guilds as taphonomic agents in central and northern Ontario, Canada

Forbes, Shari L., Samson, Clifford, Watson, Christopher J.·2022·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

The process of human decomposition is driven by biological decomposers, mainly bacteria, vertebrates, and invertebrate scavengers. When vertebrate scavengers have access to a body, they can considerably accelerate decomposition through consumption of soft tissue and dispersal of skeletal elements. Presently, there are limited data available on vertebrate scavenging activity in Canada, particularly in densely populated provinces such as Ontario. This study aimed to determine which vertebrate species belong to the scavenger guilds in central and northern Ontario, and the impact of season and habitat on these taphonomic agents. Seasonal trials were conducted in summer, fall, and spring of 2020/2021 with pig carcasses placed in open (grassland) and closed (forest) sites. Vertebrate scavenger activity was recorded continuously using cellular and non‐cellular trail cameras. Photographs were analyzed to identify species, quantify feeding intensity, and document scavenging behavior. We identified four mammalian scavengers, namely coyote, red fox, fisher, and pine marten, and three avian scavengers, namely bald eagle, turkey vulture, and American crows/northern ravens (grouped as corvids) across the trials. Season impacted scavenger presence with feeding and loss of soft tissue occurring more quickly in the summer, followed by spring and fall. None of the scavengers demonstrated a clear preference for the open versus closed sites. Our findings have identified the most prevalent vertebrate scavengers in central and northern Ontario and their taphonomic impact on soft and hard tissues. It is important to consider these agents and their ability to degrade and disperse remains during the search and recovery of human remains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.15122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704473 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/1556‐4029.13786 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.021 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/1556‐4029.12025 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1556‐4029.2011.02017.x · DOI
  6. 10.3390/biology11040601 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/1556‐4029.12468 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/1556‐4029.12554 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110969 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.022 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/00085030.2017.1260894 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.09.002 · DOI
  14. 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
  15. 10.1520/JFS45305J · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1556‐4029.2009.01020.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110392 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.030 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/1556‐4029.12597 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/1556‐4029.12992 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/1556‐4029.13694 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/1556‐4029.14238 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110982 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/1556‐4029.14716 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/1556‐4029.14929 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/wfs2.1409 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110197 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0801789105 · DOI
  30. 10.7717/peerj.1986 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1365‐2656.12663 · DOI
  32. 10.3356/JRR‐17‐93.1 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41598‐019‐38543‐5 · DOI
  34. 10.1139/cjz‐2020‐026 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/jme/tjab072 · DOI
  37. 10.3957/056.045.0112 · DOI
  38. 10.2193/2007‐006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Forbes, S. L., Samson, C., & Watson, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Government of Ontario (CA)
  • Département des Sciences de l'Environnement UQTR Orillia Ontario Canada
Corresponding author
Forbes, Shari L.
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-11
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
2203-2217
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W4300772004
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/6098/2019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
vertebrate scavengers, scavenger guilds, taphonomy, human decomposition, seasonal variation, coyote, red fox, fishermen, Martes martes, bald eagle, turkey vulture, Corvidae, human remains recovery, trail cameras, Ontario
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Feeding Behavior, Fishes, Foxes, Humans, Ontario, Seasons, Swine, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review