THE EDGE OF STIGMA: AN EXPERIMENTAL AUDIT OF THE EFFECTS OF LOW‐LEVEL CRIMINAL RECORDS ON EMPLOYMENT
Open accessAbstract
Ample experimental evidence shows that the stigma of a prison record reduces employment opportunities (Pager, 2007). Yet background checks today uncover a much broader range of impropriety, including arrests for minor crimes never resulting in formal charges. This article probes the lesser boundaries of stigma, asking whether and how employers consider low‐level arrests in hiring decisions. Matched pairs of young African American and White men were sent to apply for 300 entry‐level jobs, with one member of each pair reporting a disorderly conduct arrest that did not lead to conviction. We find a modest but nontrivial effect, with employer callback rates about 4 percentage points lower for the experimental group than for the matched control group. Interviews with the audited employers suggest three mechanisms to account for the lesser stigma of misdemeanor arrests relative to felony convictions: 1) greater employer discretion and authority in the former case; 2) calibration of the severity, nature, and timing of the offense; and 3) a deeply held presumption of innocence, which contrasts the uncertainty of arrest with the greater certainty represented by convictions. In addition, personal contact and workplace diversity play important roles in the hiring process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies find no interaction between race and criminal background.
“However, Galgano (2009), Uggen et al. (2014), andDecker (2015) find no such interaction.”
From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Uggen et al. (2014)
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746 · see citing works
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840 · see citing works
Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment
Pager, D., Bonikowski, B., & Western, B. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400505 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
Incarceration and Stratification
Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Run: Wanted Men in a Philadelphia Ghetto
Goffman, A. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400301 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Cumulative prevalence of arrest from ages 8 to 23 in a national sample
Brame, R., Turner, M. G., Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3710 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shannon, S. K. S., Uggen, C., Schnittker, J., Thompson, M., Wakefield, S., & Massoglia, M. (2017) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-017-0611-1 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Lageson, S., & Stewart, R. (2024) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12359 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- UGGEN, C., VUOLO, M., LAGESON, S., RUHLAND, E., & K. WHITHAM, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Department of Public Health University of Minnesota
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 627-654
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2099554529
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 53.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Institute of Justice (2007-IJ-CX-0042)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- criminal record stigma, misdemeanor arrests, employment discrimination, hiring decisions, background checks, presumption of innocence, African American men, workplace diversity, entry-level jobs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review