The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm formation by enteric pathogens and its role in plant colonization and persistence
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The significant increase in foodborne outbreaks caused by contaminated fresh produce, such as alfalfa sprouts, lettuce, melons, tomatoes and spinach, during the last 30 years stimulated investigation of the mechanisms of persistence of human pathogens on plants. Emerging evidence suggests that S almonella enterica and E scherichia coli , which cause the vast majority of fresh produce outbreaks, are able to adhere to and to form biofilms on plants leading to persistence and resistance to disinfection treatments, which subsequently can cause human infections and major outbreaks. In this review, we present the current knowledge about host, bacterial and environmental factors that affect the attachment to plant tissue and the process of biofilm formation by S . enterica and E . coli , and discuss how biofilm formation assists in persistence of pathogens on the plants. Mechanisms used by S . enterica and E . coli to adhere and persist on abiotic surfaces and mammalian cells are partially similar and also used by plant pathogens and symbionts. For example, amyloid curli fimbriae, part of the extracellular matrix of biofilms, frequently contribute to adherence and are upregulated upon adherence and colonization of plant material. Also the major exopolysaccharide of the biofilm matrix, cellulose, is an adherence factor not only of S . enterica and E . coli , but also of plant symbionts and pathogens. Plants, on the other hand, respond to colonization by enteric pathogens with a variety of defence mechanisms, some of which can effectively inhibit biofilm formation. Consequently, plant compounds might be investigated for promising novel antibiofilm strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 · Cited by 4,544
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Cyclic di-GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial Second Messenger
Römling, U., Galperin, M. Y., & Gomelsky, M. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00043-12 · Cited by 1,700
Self-citationBacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately
Dunne, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002 · Cited by 1,516
Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x · Cited by 1,286
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,248
Barnhart, M. M., & Chapman, M. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Hobley, L., Harkins, C., MacPhee, C. E., & Stanley-Wall, N. R. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv015 · Cited by 581
“…interactions, including symbioses with other organisms, such as the formation of biofilms on plant tissues and the colonization of the squid by the luminescent bacteria Aliivibrio fischeri (formerly Vibrio fischeri ) (Nyholm et al. 2000; Bais, Fall and Vivanco 2004; Yaron and Romling 2014).”
BackgroundGenetic control of bacterial biofilms
Wolska, K. I., Grudniak, A. M., Rudnicka, Z., & Markowska, K. (2016) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-015-0309-2 · Cited by 154
Processing and Preservation of Fresh-Cut Fruit and Vegetable Products
Jideani, A. I. O., Anyasi, T. A., Mchau, G. R. A., Udoro, E. O., & Onipe, O. O. (2017) · Postharvest Handling · doi:10.5772/intechopen.69763 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaron, S., & Römling, U.
- Venue
- Microbial Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 496-516
- ISSN
- 1751-7915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1915182040
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm formation by enteric pathogens and its role in plant colonization and persistence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1751-7915.12186
- The paper
- Yaron, S., & Römling, U. (2014). Biofilm formation by enteric pathogens and its role in plant colonization and persistence. Microbial Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.